Maarten Kamermans

Dr. Maarten Kamermans

Netherlands Institute for neuroscience
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2009 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMaria M. van Genderen
Maria M. van Genderen
MBMieke M.C. Bijveld
Mieke M.C. Bijveld
YCYvonne B. Claassen
Yvonne B. Claassen
RFRalph J. Florijn
Ralph J. Florijn
JPJillian Pearring
Jillian Pearring
Maarten KamermansMaarten Kamermans
Maarten Kamermans

12 April 2017 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMarcus Howlett
Marcus Howlett
RSRobert G. Smith
Robert G. Smith
Maarten KamermansMaarten Kamermans
Maarten Kamermans
An animal’s ability to survive depends on its sensory systems being able to adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions, by maximizing the information extracted and reducing the noise transmitted. The visual system does this by adapting to luminance and contrast. While luminance adaptation can begin at the retinal photoreceptors, contrast adaptation has been shown to start at later stages in the retina. Photoreceptors adapt to changes in luminance over multiple time scales ranging from tens of milliseconds to minutes, with the adaptive changes arising from processes within the phototransduction cascade. Here we show a new form of adaptation in cones that is independent of the phototransduction process. Rather, it is mediated by voltage-gated ion channels in the cone membrane and acts by changing the frequency response of cones such that their responses speed up as the membrane potential modulation depth increases and slow down as the membrane potential modulation depth decreases. This mechanism is effectively activated by high-contrast stimuli dominated by low frequencies such as natural stimuli. However, the more generally used Gaussian white noise stimuli were not effective since they did not modulate the cone membrane potential to the same extent. This new adaptive process had a time constant of less than a second. A critical component of the underlying mechanism is the hyperpolarization-activated current, Ih, as pharmacologically blocking it prevented the long- and mid- wavelength sensitive cone photoreceptors (L- and M-cones) from adapting. Consistent with this, short- wavelength sensitive cone photoreceptors (S-cones) did not show the adaptive response, and we found they also lacked a prominent Ih. The adaptive filtering mechanism identified here improves the information flow by removing higher-frequency noise during lower signal-to-noise ratio conditions, as occurs when contrast levels are low. Although this new adaptive mechanism can be driven by contrast, it is not a contrast adaptation mechanism in its strictest sense, as will be argued in the Discussion. An animal’s ability to survive depends on its ability to adapt to a wide range of light conditions, by maximizing the information flow through the retina. Here, we show a new form of adaptation in cone photoreceptors that helps them optimize the information they transmit by adjusting their response kinetics to better match the visual conditions. The adaptive mechanism we describe is independent of the cone phototransduction process and is instead mediated by membrane processes in which the hyperpolarization-activated current, Ih, plays a critical role. Consistent with the critical role of this current, we also found that cones sensitive to short wavelengths lacked a prominent Ih current and did not show this new form of adaptation. As voltage-dependent processes underlie the adaptational mechanism, it is only apparent when the stimuli are able to sufficiently modulate the membrane potential of cones. This happens with natural stimuli, which are able to deliver high levels of “effective” contrast. However, even though this new adaptive mechanism can be driven by contrast, we argue in the Discussion that in its strictest sense it is not a contrast adaptation mechanism per se.

14 March 2016 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDStephanie Dooves
Stephanie Dooves
MBMarianna Bugiani
Marianna Bugiani
NPNienke L. Postma
Nienke L. Postma
EPEmiel Polder
Emiel Polder
NLNiels Land
Niels Land
MKMarjo S. van der Knaap
Marjo S. van der Knaap
Vanishing white matter (VWM) is a fatal leukodystrophy that is caused by mutations in genes encoding subunits of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B). Disease onset and severity are codetermined by genotype. White matter astrocytes and oligodendrocytes are almost exclusively affected; however, the mechanisms of VWM development remain unclear. Here, we used VWM mouse models, patients’ tissue, and cell cultures to investigate whether astrocytes or oligodendrocytes are the primary affected cell type. We generated 2 mouse models with mutations (Eif2b5Arg191His/Arg191His and Eif2b4Arg484Trp/Arg484Trp) that cause severe VWM in humans and then crossed these strains to develop mice with various mutation combinations. Phenotypic severity was highly variable and dependent on genotype, reproducing the clinical spectrum of human VWM. In all mutant strains, impaired maturation of white matter astrocytes preceded onset and paralleled disease severity and progression. Bergmann glia and retinal Müller cells, nonforebrain astrocytes that have not been associated with VWM, were also affected, and involvement of these cells was confirmed in VWM patients. In coculture, VWM astrocytes secreted factors that inhibited oligodendrocyte maturation, whereas WT astrocytes allowed normal maturation of VWM oligodendrocytes. These studies demonstrate that astrocytes are central in VWM pathomechanisms and constitute potential therapeutic targets. Importantly, astrocytes should also be considered in the pathophysiology of other white matter disorders.

1 February 2012 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNeal S. Peachey
Neal S. Peachey
TRThomas A. Ray
Thomas A. Ray
RFRalph Florijn
Ralph Florijn
LRLucy B. Rowe
Lucy B. Rowe
TSTrijntje Sjoerdsma
Trijntje Sjoerdsma
RGRonald G. Gregg
Ronald G. Gregg

19 July 2011 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLauw J Klaassen
Lauw J Klaassen
ZSZiyi Sun
Ziyi Sun
MSMarvin N Steijaert
Marvin N Steijaert
PBPetra Bolte
Petra Bolte
IFIris Fahrenfort
Iris Fahrenfort
Maarten KamermansMaarten Kamermans
Maarten Kamermans
In the vertebrate retina, horizontal cells generate the inhibitory surround of bipolar cells, an essential step in contrast enhancement. For the last decades, the mechanism involved in this inhibitory synaptic pathway has been a major controversy in retinal research. One hypothesis suggests that connexin hemichannels mediate this negative feedback signal; another suggests that feedback is mediated by protons. Mutant zebrafish were generated that lack connexin 55.5 hemichannels in horizontal cells. Whole cell voltage clamp recordings were made from isolated horizontal cells and cones in flat mount retinas. Light-induced feedback from horizontal cells to cones was reduced in mutants. A reduction of feedback was also found when horizontal cells were pharmacologically hyperpolarized but was absent when they were pharmacologically depolarized. Hemichannel currents in isolated horizontal cells showed a similar behavior. The hyperpolarization-induced hemichannel current was strongly reduced in the mutants while the depolarization-induced hemichannel current was not. Intracellular recordings were made from horizontal cells. Consistent with impaired feedback in the mutant, spectral opponent responses in horizontal cells were diminished in these animals. A behavioral assay revealed a lower contrast-sensitivity, illustrating the role of the horizontal cell to cone feedback pathway in contrast enhancement. Model simulations showed that the observed modifications of feedback can be accounted for by an ephaptic mechanism. A model for feedback, in which the number of connexin hemichannels is reduced to about 40%, fully predicts the specific asymmetric modification of feedback. To our knowledge, this is the first successful genetic interference in the feedback pathway from horizontal cells to cones. It provides direct evidence for an unconventional role of connexin hemichannels in the inhibitory synapse between horizontal cells and cones. This is an important step in resolving a long-standing debate about the unusual form of (ephaptic) synaptic transmission between horizontal cells and cones in the vertebrate retina. Contrast enhancement is a fundamental feature of our visual system, initiated at the first synaptic connections in the retina. These are the synapses between photoreceptors (rods and cones) and their targets, horizontal cells and bipolar cells. Horizontal cells receive input from many cones and subsequently send a feedback signal to photoreceptors. Bipolar cells, however, receive direct input from only a few photoreceptors, but also receive indirect inhibitory input from surrounding cones via the horizontal cell feedback pathway. This organization induces the classic center/surround organization of bipolar cells and is considered the first step in contrast enhancement. Exactly how horizontal cells send feedback signals to photoreceptors has remained a mystery, however. One hypothesis posits that connexin hemichannels are involved. In this study, we tested this hypothesis using mutant zebrafish that lack connexin hemichannels specifically in horizontal cells. Our electrophysiology experiments showed that feedback is indeed reduced in these mutants, confirming that connexin hemichannels play an important role in feedback from horizontal cells to cones. In addition, we find that these mutant fish have decreased contrast sensitivity at a behavioral level, illustrating that functionally relevant contrast enhancement begins at the first synapse of the visual system.

20 May 2014 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRozan Vroman
Rozan Vroman
LKLauw J Klaassen
Lauw J Klaassen
MHMarcus Howlett
Marcus Howlett
VCValentina Cenedese
Valentina Cenedese
JKJan Klooster
Jan Klooster
Maarten KamermansMaarten Kamermans
Maarten Kamermans
Neuronal computations strongly depend on inhibitory interactions. One such example occurs at the first retinal synapse, where horizontal cells inhibit photoreceptors. This interaction generates the center/surround organization of bipolar cell receptive fields and is crucial for contrast enhancement. Despite its essential role in vision, the underlying synaptic mechanism has puzzled the neuroscience community for decades. Two competing hypotheses are currently considered: an ephaptic and a proton-mediated mechanism. Here we show that horizontal cells feed back to photoreceptors via an unexpected synthesis of the two. The first one is a very fast ephaptic mechanism that has no synaptic delay, making it one of the fastest inhibitory synapses known. The second one is a relatively slow (τ≈200 ms), highly intriguing mechanism. It depends on ATP release via Pannexin 1 channels located on horizontal cell dendrites invaginating the cone synaptic terminal. The ecto-ATPase NTPDase1 hydrolyses extracellular ATP to AMP, phosphate groups, and protons. The phosphate groups and protons form a pH buffer with a pKa of 7.2, which keeps the pH in the synaptic cleft relatively acidic. This inhibits the cone Ca2+ channels and consequently reduces the glutamate release by the cones. When horizontal cells hyperpolarize, the pannexin 1 channels decrease their conductance, the ATP release decreases, and the formation of the pH buffer reduces. The resulting alkalization in the synaptic cleft consequently increases cone glutamate release. Surprisingly, the hydrolysis of ATP instead of ATP itself mediates the synaptic modulation. Our results not only solve longstanding issues regarding horizontal cell to photoreceptor feedback, they also demonstrate a new form of synaptic modulation. Because pannexin 1 channels and ecto-ATPases are strongly expressed in the nervous system and pannexin 1 function is implicated in synaptic plasticity, we anticipate that this novel form of synaptic modulation may be a widespread phenomenon. At the first retinal synapse, specific cells—horizontal cells (HCs)—inhibit photoreceptors and help to organize the receptive fields of another retinal cell type, bipolar cells. This synaptic interaction is crucial for visual contrast enhancement. Here we show that horizontal cells feed back to photoreceptors via a very fast ephaptic mechanism and a relatively slow mechanism. The slow mechanism requires ATP release via Pannexin 1 (Panx1) channels that are located on HC dendrites near the site where photoreceptors release the neurotransmitter glutamate to HCs and bipolar cells. The released ATP is hydrolyzed to produce AMP, phosphate groups, and protons; these phosphates and protons form a pH buffer, which acidifies the synaptic cleft. This slow acidification inhibits presynaptic calcium channels and consequently reduces the neurotransmitter release of photoreceptors. This demonstrates a new way in which ATP release can be involved in synaptic modulation. Surprisingly, the action of ATP is not purinergic but is mediated via changes in the pH buffer capacity in the synaptic cleft. Given the broad expression of Panx1 channels in the nervous system and the suggestion that Panx1 function underlies stabilization of synaptic plasticity and is needed for learning, we anticipate that this mechanism will be more widespread than just occurring at the first retinal synapse.