Louisa Coglan

Dr. Louisa Coglan

School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2005 in Fisheries Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DTDiana Tingley
Diana Tingley
SPSean Pascoe
Sean Pascoe
LCLouisa Coglan
Louisa Coglan

1 October 2016 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAmar Doshi
Amar Doshi
SPSean Pascoe
Sean Pascoe
LCLouisa Coglan
Louisa Coglan
TRThomas J. Rainey
Thomas J. Rainey


1 August 2005 in Health Technology Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPC Price
C Price
NAN Arden
N Arden
LCLouisa Coglan
Louisa Coglan
PRP Rogers
P Rogers
Health Technology Assessment Volume: 9, Issue: 33, Published in August 2005

1 August 2016 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJean-Baptiste Marre
Jean-Baptiste Marre
OTOlivier Thébaud
Olivier Thébaud
SPSean Pascoe
Sean Pascoe
SJSarah Jennings
Sarah Jennings
JBJean Boncoeur
Jean Boncoeur
LCLouisa Coglan
Louisa Coglan

6 April 2004 in International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDeborah Gibbard
Deborah Gibbard
LCLouisa Coglan
Louisa Coglan
JMJohn MacDonald
John MacDonald
Background: Parents and professionals can both play a role in improving children's expressive language development and a number of alternative models of delivery exist that involve different levels of input by these two groups. However, these alternative treatments have not been subject to rigorous comparative analysis in terms of both cost and clinical effectiveness.Aims: To compare, from the viewpoint of the healthcare provider, parent‐based intervention (PBI) for preschool children presenting with expressive language delay with current practice observed in an actual healthcare setting where parents of the child follow a professional's advice on a review basis.Methods & Procedures: Two groups of children were compared on a variety of expressive and receptive language assessment measures. One group (n=10) received standard individual general care. The comparison group (n=12) received PBI.Outcomes & Results: After the 6‐month study, the results indicated that children who received PBI made significantly greater language gains that children who received current practice. In addition, a cost‐effective analysis was conducted. This showed that although the language gains delivered by PBI did incur some additional costs for the healthcare provider, there was no significant increase in cost per outcome gain over general care.Conclusions: Options in the implementation of PBI are discussed that could potentially save costs for the healthcare providers and increase the value of a PBI‐based approach.