Chang Hu

Dr. Chang Hu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 March 2020 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDawei Wang
Dawei Wang
BHBo Hu
Bo Hu
CHChang Hu
Chang Hu
FZFangfang Zhu
Fangfang Zhu
XLXing Liu
Xing Liu
ZPZhiyong Peng
Zhiyong Peng
In December 2019, a cluster of acute respiratory illness, now known as novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia (NCIP), occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.1-5 The disease has rapidly spread from Wuhan to other areas. As of January 31, 2020, a total of 9692 NCIP cases in China have been confirmed. Internationally, cases have been reported in 24 countries and 5 continents.6 On January 3, 2020, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was identified in samples of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from a patient in Wuhan and was confirmed as the cause of the NCIP.7 Full-genome sequencing and phylogenic analysis indicated that 2019-nCoV is a distinct clade from the betacoronaviruses associated with human severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).7 The 2019-nCoV has features typical of the coronavirus family and was classified in the betacoronavirus 2b lineage. The 2019-nCoV has close similarity to bat coronaviruses, and it has been postulated that bats are the primary source. While the origin of the 2019-nCoV is still being investigated, current evidence suggests spread to humans occurred via transmission from wild animals illegally sold in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.8

1 June 2020 in Journal of Clinical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GZGuqin Zhang
Guqin Zhang
CHChang Hu
Chang Hu
LLLinjie Luo
Linjie Luo
FFFang Fang
Fang Fang
YCYongfeng Chen
Yongfeng Chen
HPHuaqin Pan
Huaqin Pan

30 April 2020 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDawei Wang
Dawei Wang
YYYimei Yin
Yimei Yin
CHChang Hu
Chang Hu
XLXing Liu
Xing Liu
XZXingguo Zhang
Xingguo Zhang
ZPZhiyong Peng
Zhiyong Peng
Background: In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was reported from Wuhan, China. Information on the clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19 was not thoroughly described. We described the clinical courses and prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Retrospective case series of COVID-19 patients from Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in Wuhan and Xishui Hospital, Hubei Province, China, up to February 10, 2020. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical data were collected. The clinical course of survivors and non-survivors were compared. Risk factors for death were analyzed. Results: A total of 107 discharged patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. The clinical course of COVID-19 presented as a tri-phasic pattern. Week 1 after illness onset was characterized by fever, cough, dyspnea, lymphopenia, and radiological multi-lobar pulmonary infiltrates. In severe cases, thrombocytopenia, acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, and adult respiratory distress syndrome were observed. During week 2, in mild cases, fever, cough, and systemic symptoms began to resolve and platelet count rose to normal range, but lymphopenia persisted. In severe cases, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and deteriorating multi-organ dysfunction were dominant. By week 3, mild cases had clinically resolved except for lymphopenia. However, severe cases showed persistent lymphopenia, severe acute respiratory dyspnea syndrome, refractory shock, anuric acute kidney injury, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and death. Older age and male sex were independent risk factors for poor outcome of the illness. Conclusions: A period of 7–13 days after illness onset is the critical stage in the COVID-19 course. Age and male gender were independent risk factors for death of COVID-19.

6 March 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GZGuqin Zhang
Guqin Zhang
CHChang Hu
Chang Hu
LLLinjie Luo
Linjie Luo
FFFang Fang
Fang Fang
YCYongfeng Chen
Yongfeng Chen
HPHuaqin Pan
Huaqin Pan
Rationale: In late December 2019, an outbreak of acute respiratory illness, now officially named as COVID-19, or coronavirus disease 2019, emerged in Wuhan, China, now spreading across the whole country and world. More data were needed to understand the clinical characteristics of the disease. Objectives: To study the epidemiology, clinical features and outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Methods: we performed a single center, retrospective case series study in 221 patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia at a university hospital. Measurements and Main Results: The median age was 55.0 years and 48.9% were male and only 8 (3.6%) patients had a history of exposure to the Huanan Seafood Market. Compared to the non-severe pneumonia patients, the median age of the severe patients was significantly older, and they were more likely to have chronic comorbidities. Most common symptoms in severe patients were high fever, anorexia and dyspnea. On admission, 33.0% patients showed leukopenia and 73.8% showed lymphopenia. In addition, the severe patients suffered a higher rate of co-infections with bacteria or fungus and they were more likely to developing complications. As of February 15, 2020, 19.0% patients had been discharged and 5.4% patients died. 80% of severe cases received ICU care, and 52.3% of them transferred to the general wards due to relieved symptoms, and the mortality rate of severe patients in ICU was 20.5%. Conclusions: The COVID-19 epidemic spreads rapidly by human-to-human transmission. Patients with elder age, chronic comorbidities, blood leukocyte/lymphocyte count, procalcitonin level, co-infection and severe complications might increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes.

20 August 2020 in Shock
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SZShuliang Zhou
Shuliang Zhou
YYYadong Yang
Yadong Yang
XZXingguo Zhang
Xingguo Zhang
ZLZhifeng Li
Zhifeng Li
XLXing Liu
Xing Liu
ZPZhiyong Peng
Zhiyong Peng
Introduction: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has spread around the world. However, the dynamic course of critically ill COVID-19 has not been described thoroughly. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 195 critically ill COVID-19 patients in Hubei province, China, between January 5, 2020 and April 3, 2020. Epidemiologic data, clinical features, treatments, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: Most critically ill patients were older with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. After critical illness onset, a total of 181 (92.8%) patients received ventilation support, of which 84 (43.1%) received noninvasive and 97 (49.7%) received invasive mechanic ventilation (IMV). Among the 97 patients with IMV, 28 (28.9%) received prone ventilation, 57 (58.8%) received neuromuscular blocked therapy, and 22 (11.3%) received tracheostomy due to prolonged ventilator use. Early hypoxemia, subsequent hypercapnia, pulmonary hypertension, and finally pulmonary fibrosis were notable in the clinical course of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Eighty-nine (45.6%) patients presented with shock. Acute kidney injury (29.7%) and secondary infection (28.2%) were also notable. The overall mortality of critically ill patients at day 28 was 42.1%. Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was around 33%, as 16 patients died prior to ICU admission. A low PaO2/FiO2 ratio was an independent risk factor for death. High viral load was observed in most non-survivors. Conclusion: ARDS and shock were notable in the critical illness of COVID-19. Ventilation support and hemodynamic support were the cornerstones for critical care. High viral load was associated with death of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

24 February 2020 in Shock
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QNQi Nie
Qi Nie
DWDawei Wang
Dawei Wang
ZNZhijie Ning
Zhijie Ning
TLTianmin Li
Tianmin Li
XTXinghan Tian
Xinghan Tian
ZPZhiyong Peng
Zhiyong Peng
Introduction: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging zoonosis infected by virus (SFTSV) in central and eastern China, which is associated with high mortality. However, limited clinical data have been reported about this critical illness. Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort study in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with SFTSV infection admitted in 2014 to 2019. Diagnosis was confirmed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction on serum samples. Results: One hundred sixteen patients with SFTSV infection were included (mean age 63 ± 9 years, 59 [51.3%] males). Non-survivors (43.1%) were older, and had lower Glasgow Coma Score, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and sequential organ failure assessment score at ICU admission. In addition, non-survivors had more severe respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2: 208 ± 14 mm Hg vs. 297 ± 15 mm Hg), more frequent shock (25[50%] vs. 7[10.6%]), and required more frequently mechanical ventilation (78% vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001) and vasopressor support (56% vs. 9.1%; P < 0.001). Non-survivors experienced more obvious monocyte loss. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, older age, elevated lactate level, and elevated creatinine level were the independent risk factors for death. Conclusion: We provided knowledge about the clinical characteristics of SFTS admitted in ICU. Older age, elevated lactate level, and elevated creatinine level may be useful for identifying patients with poor outcome and intensive medical intervention can be provided for patients as soon as possible to reduce mortality.