Robert Nairn

Dr. Robert Nairn

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 September 2016 in Mine Water and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJeff Skousen
Jeff Skousen
CZCarl E. Zipper
Carl E. Zipper
ARArthur Rose
Arthur Rose
PZPaul F. Ziemkiewicz
Paul F. Ziemkiewicz
Robert NairnRobert Nairn
Robert Nairn
RKRobert L. Kleinmann
Robert L. Kleinmann
When appropriately designed and maintained, passive systems can provide long-term, efficient, and effective treatment for many acid mine drainage (AMD) sources. Passive AMD treatment relies on natural processes to neutralize acidity and to oxidize or reduce and precipitate metal contaminants. Passive treatment is most suitable for small to moderate AMD discharges of appropriate chemistry, but periodic inspection and maintenance plus eventual renovation are generally required. Passive treatment technologies can be separated into biological and geochemical types. Biological passive treatment technologies generally rely on bacterial activity, and may use organic matter to stimulate microbial sulfate reduction and to adsorb contaminants; constructed wetlands, vertical flow wetlands, and bioreactors are all examples. Geochemical systems place alkalinity-generating materials such as limestone in contact with AMD (direct treatment) or with fresh water up-gradient of the AMD. Most passive treatment systems employ multiple methods, often in series, to promote acid neutralization and oxidation and precipitation of the resulting metal flocs. Before selecting an appropriate treatment technology, the AMD conditions and chemistry must be characterized. Flow, acidity and alkalinity, metal, and dissolved oxygen concentrations are critical parameters. This paper reviews the current state of passive system technology development, provides results for various system types, and provides guidance for sizing and effective operation.

1 December 1998 in BioScience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WMWilliam J. Mitsch
William J. Mitsch
XWXinyuan Wu
Xinyuan Wu
Robert NairnRobert Nairn
Robert Nairn
PWPaul E. Weihe
Paul E. Weihe
NWNaiming Wang
Naiming Wang
CBCharles E. Boucher
Charles E. Boucher

1 November 1994 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRobert S. Hedin
Robert S. Hedin
GWGeorge R. Watzlaf
George R. Watzlaf
Robert NairnRobert Nairn
Robert Nairn

1 August 1995 in Ecological Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WMWilliam J. Mitsch
William J. Mitsch
JCJulie K. Cronk
Julie K. Cronk
XWX. Ben Wu
X. Ben Wu
Robert NairnRobert Nairn
Robert Nairn
DHDonald L. Hey
Donald L. Hey

1 September 1999 in Ecological Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Robert NairnRobert Nairn
Robert Nairn
WMWilliam J. Mitsch
William J. Mitsch

14 February 2023 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OOOlivia Celeste Overton
Olivia Celeste Overton
LOLeif Hans Olson
Leif Hans Olson
SMSreemala Das Majumder
Sreemala Das Majumder
HSHani Shwiyyat
Hani Shwiyyat
MFMary Elizabeth Foltz
Mary Elizabeth Foltz
Robert NairnRobert Nairn
Robert Nairn
In recent decades, previously unobserved trace compounds have become more widely detected in wastewater treatment effluents and freshwater ecosystems. Emanating from various sources and presenting potential human health and ecological risks at much lesser concentrations than traditional contaminants, detection of “emerging contaminants” has increased with improvements in analytical techniques. The behavior of emerging contaminants in wetlands is a topic of increasing interest, as natural wetlands are known to transform and sequester pollutants and constructed or treatment wetlands are widely utilized to address elevated concentrations of constituents of concern. Both natural and constructed wetlands are complex biogeochemical systems with interrelated abiotic and biotic mechanisms leading to the removal of emerging contaminants. A literature review was performed to assess the current state of knowledge of various wetland mechanisms involved in removing these contaminants from surface waters and effluents. The primary mechanisms discussed in the literature are sorption, photodegradation, microbial biodegradation and phytoremediation. The most influential mechanisms are dependent on the properties of the contaminants and wetland systems studied. Common trends exist for different constructed wetland designs to leverage various mechanisms based on hydrology, substrate and vegetation plantings. Much remains to be understood about the various processes occurring in wetlands as they relate to emerging contaminant removal. Improving the understanding of the potential role of wetland mechanisms can help manage this environmental challenge more effectively.