Paul G. Becher

Dr. Paul G. Becher


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarcus C. Stensmyr
Marcus C. Stensmyr
HDHany K.M. Dweck
Hany K.M. Dweck
AFAbu Farhan
Abu Farhan
IIIrene Ibba
Irene Ibba
ASAntonia Strutz
Antonia Strutz
BHBill S. Hansson
Bill S. Hansson

18 May 2012 in Functional Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPaul G. Becher
Paul G. Becher
GFG. Flick
G. Flick
ERE. Rozpędowska
E. Rozpędowska
ASA. Schmidt
A. Schmidt
AHA. Hagman
A. Hagman
MBM. Bengtsson
M. Bengtsson
Summary: 1.In nature, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is attracted to fermenting fruit. Micro‐organisms like Saccharomyces yeasts growing on fruit occupy a commonly overlooked trophic level between fruit and insects. Although the dietary quality of yeast is well established for D. melanogaster, the individual contribution of fruit and yeast on host finding and reproductive success has not been established.2.Here, we show that baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on its own is sufficient for fruit fly attraction, oviposition and larval development. In contrast, attraction and oviposition were significantly lower if non‐fermented grape juice or growth media were used, and yeast‐free grapes did not support larval development either.3.Despite a strong preference for fermented substrates, moderate attraction to and oviposition on unfermented fruit might be adaptive in view of the fly's capacity to vector yeast.4.Signals emitted by fruit were only of secondary importance because fermenting yeast without fruit induced the same fly behaviour as yeast fermenting on fruit. We identified a synthetic mimic of yeast odour, comprising ethanol, acetic acid, acetoin, 2‐phenyl ethanol and 3‐methyl‐1‐butanol, which was as attractive for the fly as fermenting grape juice or fermenting yeast minimal medium.5.Yeast odours represent the critical signal to establish the fly–fruit–yeast relationship. The traditional plant–herbivore niche concept needs to be updated, to accommodate for the role of micro‐organisms in insect–plant interactions.

13 March 2021 in Journal of Pest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJohan A. Stenberg
Johan A. Stenberg
ISIngvar Sundh
Ingvar Sundh
PBPaul G. Becher
Paul G. Becher
CBChrister Björkman
Christer Björkman
Mukesh DubeyMukesh Dubey
Mukesh Dubey
MVMaria Viketoft
Maria Viketoft
Biological control, or biocontrol, is the exploitation of living agents (incl. viruses) to combat pestilential organisms (incl. pathogens, pests, and weeds) for diverse purposes to provide human benefits. Thus, during the last century the practices and concepts involved have evolved in separate streams associated with distinct scientific and taxonomic disciplines. In parallel developments, there have been increasing references to biological control in industrial contexts and legislation, resulting in conceptual and terminological disintegration. The aim of this paper is to provide a global conceptual and terminological platform that facilitates future development of the field. We review use of previously suggested terms in key fields (e.g., phytopathology, entomology, and weed science), eliminate redundant terminology, identify three principles that should underpin the concept, and then present a new framework for biological control, rooted in seminal publications. The three principles establish that (1) only living agents can mediate biological control, (2) biological control always targets a pest, directly or indirectly, and (3) all biocontrol methods can be classified in four main categories depending on whether resident agents are utilized, with or without targeted human intervention (conservation biological control and natural biological control, respectively) or agents are added for permanent or temporary establishment (classical biological control and augmentative biological control, respectively). Correct identification of what is, and is not, biological control can help efforts to understand and optimize biological pest control for human and environmental benefits. The new conceptual framework may contribute to more uniform and appropriate regulatory approaches to biological control, and more efficient authorization and application of biocontrol products.

6 April 2020 in Nature Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPaul G. Becher
Paul G. Becher
VVVasiliki Verschut
Vasiliki Verschut
MBMaureen J. Bibb
Maureen J. Bibb
MBMatthew J. Bush
Matthew J. Bush
BMBéla P. Molnár
Béla P. Molnár
KFKlas Flärdh
Klas Flärdh

2 May 2010 in Journal of Chemical Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPaul G. Becher
Paul G. Becher
MBMarie Bengtsson
Marie Bengtsson
BHBill S. Hansson
Bill S. Hansson
PWPeter Witzgall
Peter Witzgall

8 February 2012 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMohamed Saveer M Ahmed
Mohamed Saveer M Ahmed
SKSophie H. Kromann
Sophie H. Kromann
GBGöran Birgersson
Göran Birgersson
MBMarie Bengtsson
Marie Bengtsson
TLTobias Lindblom
Tobias Lindblom
RIRickard Ignell
Rickard Ignell
Mating induces profound physiological changes in a wide range of insects, leading to behavioural adjustments to match the internal state of the animal. Here, we show for the first time, to our knowledge, that a noctuid moth switches its olfactory response from food to egg-laying cues following mating. Unmated females of the cotton leafworm ( Spodoptera littoralis ) are strongly attracted to lilac flowers ( Syringa vulgaris ). After mating, attraction to floral odour is abolished and the females fly instead to green-leaf odour of the larval host plant cotton, Gossypium hirsutum . This behavioural switch is owing to a marked change in the olfactory representation of floral and green odours in the primary olfactory centre, the antennal lobe (AL). Calcium imaging, using authentic and synthetic odours, shows that the ensemble of AL glomeruli dedicated to either lilac or cotton odour is selectively up- and downregulated in response to mating. A clear-cut behavioural modulation as a function of mating is a useful substrate for studies of the neural mechanisms underlying behavioural decisions. Modulation of odour-driven behaviour through concerted regulation of odour maps contributes to our understanding of state-dependent choice and host shifts in insect herbivores.