Thorsten Rudroff

Dr. Thorsten Rudroff

Department of Health and Human Physiology, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2020 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thorsten RudroffThorsten Rudroff
Thorsten Rudroff
AFAlexandra Fietsam
Alexandra Fietsam
Justin DetersJustin Deters
Justin Deters
ABAndrew D. Bryant
Andrew D. Bryant
JKJohn Kamholz
John Kamholz
Much of the spotlight for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is on the acute symptoms and recovery. However, many recovered patients face persistent physical, cognitive, and psychological symptoms well past the acute phase. Of these symptoms, fatigue is one of the most persistent and debilitating. In this “perspective article,” we define fatigue as the decrease in physical and/or mental performance that results from changes in central, psychological, and/or peripheral factors due to the COVID-19 disease and propose a model to explain potential factors contributing to post-COVID-19 fatigue. According to our model, fatigue is dependent on conditional and physiological factors. Conditional dependency comprises the task, environment, and physical and mental capacity of individuals, while physiological factors include central, psychological, and peripheral aspects. This model provides a framework for clinicians and researchers. However, future research is needed to validate our proposed model and elucidate all mechanisms of fatigue due to COVID-19.

19 June 2020 in Frontiers in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thorsten RudroffThorsten Rudroff
Thorsten Rudroff
CWCraig D. Workman
Craig D. Workman
AFAlexandra C. Fietsam
Alexandra C. Fietsam
JKJohn Kamholz
John Kamholz
Response Variability in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Why Sex Matters

29 July 2024 in Neurology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thorsten RudroffThorsten Rudroff
Thorsten Rudroff
Animal experimentation has long been a cornerstone of neurology research, but it faces growing scientific, ethical, and economic challenges. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are providing new opportunities to replace animal testing with more human-relevant and efficient methods. This article explores the potential of AI technologies such as brain organoids, computational models, and machine learning to revolutionize neurology research and reduce reliance on animal models. These approaches can better recapitulate human brain physiology, predict drug responses, and uncover novel insights into neurological disorders. They also offer faster, cheaper, and more ethical alternatives to animal experiments. Case studies demonstrate AI’s ability to accelerate drug discovery for Alzheimer’s, predict neurotoxicity, personalize treatments for Parkinson’s, and restore movement in paralysis. While challenges remain in validating and integrating these technologies, the scientific, economic, practical, and moral advantages are driving a paradigm shift towards AI-based, animal-free research in neurology. With continued investment and collaboration across sectors, AI promises to accelerate the development of safer and more effective therapies for neurological conditions while significantly reducing animal use. The path forward requires the ongoing development and validation of these technologies, but a future in which they largely replace animal experiments in neurology appears increasingly likely. This transition heralds a new era of more humane, human-relevant, and innovative brain research.

11 February 2020 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWCraig Workman
Craig Workman
AFAlexandra Fietsam
Alexandra Fietsam
EUErgun Y. Uc
Ergun Y. Uc
Thorsten RudroffThorsten Rudroff
Thorsten Rudroff
People with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD) often experience gait and balance problems that substantially impact their quality of life. Pharmacological, surgical, and rehabilitative treatments have limited effectiveness and many PwPD continue to experience gait and balance impairment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may represent a viable therapeutic adjunct. The effects of lower intensity tDCS (2 mA) over frontal brain areas, in unilateral and bilateral montages, has previously been explored; however, the effects of lower and higher intensity cerebellar tDCS (2 mA and 4 mA, respectively) on gait and balance has not been investigated. Seven PwPD underwent five cerebellar tDCS conditions (sham, unilateral 2 mA, bilateral 2 mA, unilateral 4 mA, and bilateral 4 mA) for 20 min. After a 10 min rest, gait and balance were tested. The results indicated that the bilateral 4 mA cerebellar tDCS condition had a significantly higher Berg Balance Scale score compared to sham. This study provides preliminary evidence that a single session of tDCS over the cerebellum, using a bilateral configuration at a higher intensity (4 mA), significantly improved balance performance. This intensity and cerebellar configuration warrants future investigation in larger samples and over repeated sessions.

15 November 2021 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thorsten RudroffThorsten Rudroff
Thorsten Rudroff
CWCraig Workman
Craig Workman
LPLaura L. Boles Ponto
Laura L. Boles Ponto
Scientific evidence concerning the subacute and long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is on the rise. It has been established that infection by serious acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a systemic process that involves multiple organs. The complications and long-term consequences of COVID-19 are diverse and patients need a multidisciplinary treatment approach in the acute and post-acute stages of the disease. A significant proportion of COVID-19 patients experience neurological manifestations, some enduring for several months post-recovery. However, brain and skeletal muscle changes resultant from SARS CoV-2 infection remain largely unknown. Here, we provide a brief overview of the current knowledge, and usefulness, of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to investigate brain and skeletal muscles changes in Post-COVID-19 patients with persistent symptoms. Furthermore, a brief discussion of future 18F-FDG-PET/CT applications that might advance the current knowledge of the pathogenesis of post-COVID-19 is also provided.

1 January 2020 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWCraig Workman
Craig Workman
JKJ. Kamholz
J. Kamholz
Thorsten RudroffThorsten Rudroff
Thorsten Rudroff