Aramandla Ramesh

Dr. Aramandla Ramesh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2004 in International Journal of Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Aramandla RameshAramandla Ramesh
Aramandla Ramesh
SWStormy A. Walker
Stormy A. Walker
DHDarryl B. Hood
Darryl B. Hood
MGMaria D. Guillén
Maria D. Guillén
KSKlaus Schneider
Klaus Schneider
EWEric H. Weyand
Eric H. Weyand
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a family of toxicants that are ubiquitous in the environment. These contaminants generate considerable interest, because some of them are highly carcinogenic in laboratory animals and have been implicated in breast, lung, and colon cancers in humans. These chemicals commonly enter the human body through inhalation of cigarette smoke or consumption of contaminated food. Of these two pathways, dietary intake of PAHs constitutes a major source of exposure in humans. Although many reviews and books on PAHs have been published, factors affecting the accumulation of PAHs in the diet, their absorption following ingestion, and strategies to assess risk from exposure to these hydrocarbons following ingestion have received much less attention. This review, therefore, focuses on concentrations of PAHs in widely consumed dietary ingredients along with gastrointestinal absorption rates in humans. Metabolism and bioavailability of PAHs in animal models and the processes, which influence the disposition of these chemicals, are discussed. The utilitarian value of structure and metabolism in predicting PAH toxicity and carcinogenesis is also emphasized. Finally, based on intake, disposition, and tumorigenesis data, the exposure risk to PAHs from diet, and contaminated soil is presented. This information is expected to provide a framework for refinements in risk assessment of PAHs from a multimedia exposure perspective.

30 August 2019 in BMC Medical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMatthew Morris
Matthew Morris
RCRobert Lyle Cooper
Robert Lyle Cooper
Aramandla RameshAramandla Ramesh
Aramandla Ramesh
MTMohammad Tabatabai
Mohammad Tabatabai
Thomas ArcuryThomas Arcury
Thomas Arcury
PMPatricia Matthews-Juarez
Patricia Matthews-Juarez
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) individuals experience higher rates of health disparities. These disparities may be driven, in part, by biases of medical providers encountered in health care settings. Little is known about how medical, nursing, or dental students are trained to identify and reduce the effects of their own biases toward LGBTQ individuals. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of programs to reduce health care student or provider bias towards these LGBTQ patients. The authors performed searches of online databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Ingenta, Science Direct, and Google Scholar) for original articles, published in English, between March 2005 and February 2017, describing intervention studies focused on reducing health care student or provider bias towards LGBTQ individuals. Data extracted included sample characteristics (i.e., medical, nursing, or dental students or providers), study design (i.e., pre-post intervention tests, qualitative), program format, program target (i.e., knowledge, comfort level, attitudes, implicit bias), and relevant outcomes. Study quality was assessed using a five-point scale. The search identified 639 abstracts addressing bias among medical, nursing, and dental students or providers; from these abstracts, 60 articles were identified as medical education programs to reduce bias; of these articles, 13 described programs to reduce bias towards LGBTQ patients. Bias-focused educational interventions were effective at increasing knowledge of LGBTQ health care issues. Experiential learning interventions were effective at increasing comfort levels working with LGBTQ patients. Intergroup contact was effective at promoting more tolerant attitudes toward LGBTQ patients. Despite promising support for bias education in increasing knowledge and comfort levels among medical, nursing, and dental students or providers towards LGBTQ persons, this systematic review did not identify any interventions that assessed changes in implicit bias among students or providers. Strategies for assessing and mitigating implicit bias towards LGBTQ patients are discussed and recommendations for medical, nursing, and dental school curricula are presented.

1 October 2011 in Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDeacqunita L. Diggs
Deacqunita L. Diggs
AHAshley C. Huderson
Ashley C. Huderson
KHKelly L. Harris
Kelly L. Harris
JMJeremy N. Myers
Jeremy N. Myers
LBLeah D. Banks
Leah D. Banks
Aramandla RameshAramandla Ramesh
Aramandla Ramesh
Cancers of the colon are most common in the Western world. In majority of these cases, there is no familial history and sporadic gene damage seems to play an important role in the development of tumors in the colon. Studies have shown that environmental factors, especially diet, play an important role in susceptibility to gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. Consequently, environmental chemicals that contaminate food or diet during preparation become important in the development of GI cancers. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are one such family of ubiquitous environmental toxicants. These pollutants enter the human body through consumption of contaminated food, drinking water, inhalation of cigarette smoke, automobile exhausts, and contaminated air from occupational settings. Among these pathways, dietary intake of PAHs constitutes a major source of exposure in humans. Although many reviews and books on PAHs and their ability to cause toxicity and breast or lung cancer have been published, aspects on contribution of diet, smoking and other factors toward development of digestive tract cancers, and strategies to assess risk from exposure to PAHs have received much less attention. This review, therefore, focuses on dietary intake of PAHs in humans, animal models, and cell cultures used for GI cancer studies along with epidemiological findings. Bioavailability and biotransformation processes, which influence the disposition of PAHs in body and the underlying causative mechanisms of GI cancers, are also discussed. The existing data gaps and scope for future studies is also emphasized. This information is expected to stimulate research on mechanisms of sporadic GI cancers caused by exposure to environmental carcinogens.

20 July 2006 in Journal of Applied Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSCrystal R. Saunders
Crystal R. Saunders
SDSalil K. Das
Salil K. Das
Aramandla RameshAramandla Ramesh
Aramandla Ramesh
DSDolores C. Shockley
Dolores C. Shockley
SMShyamali Mukherjee
Shyamali Mukherjee

1 January 2001 in Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Aramandla RameshAramandla Ramesh
Aramandla Ramesh
FIFrank Inyang
Frank Inyang
DHDarryl B. Hood
Darryl B. Hood
AAAnthony E. Archibong
Anthony E. Archibong
MKMaurice E. Knuckles
Maurice E. Knuckles
ANAlfred M. Nyanda
Alfred M. Nyanda

1 May 2004 in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDeanna D Wormley
Deanna D Wormley
Aramandla RameshAramandla Ramesh
Aramandla Ramesh
DHDarryl B Hood
Darryl B Hood