Przemyslaw Kardas

Prof. Przemyslaw Kardas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPrzemyslaw Kardas
Przemyslaw Kardas
PLPawel Lewek
Pawel Lewek
MMMichal Matyjaszczyk
Michal Matyjaszczyk
Purpose: A number of potential determinants of medication non-adherence has been described so far. However, heterogenic quality of existing publications poses the need for use of rigorous methodology in building a list of such determinants. The purpose of this study was a systematic review of current research on determinants of patient adherence on the grounds of recently agreed European consensus taxonomy and terminology. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, IPA, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for systematic reviews published between 2000/01/01 and 2009/12/31 that provided determinants on non-adherence to medication. The searches were limited to papers having adherence to medication prescribed by health professionals for outpatient as a major topic. Results: 51 papers were included in this review, covering 19 different disease categories. In these studies, exclusively assessing non-adherence to chronic therapies, 771 individual factor items were identified, of which most were determinants of implementation, and only 47 - determinants of persistence with medication. Factors with unambiguous effect on adherence were further grouped in 8 clusters of socio-economic-related factors, 6 of healthcare team- and system-related factors, 6 of condition-related factors, 7 of therapy-related factors, and 14 of patient-related factors. The lack of standardized definitions and poor measurement methods resulted in many inconsistencies. Conclusions: This research provides clear evidence that medication non-adherence is affected by multiple determinants. Therefore the prediction of non-adherence of individual patients is difficult. Consequently, suitable measurement and multifaceted interventions may be the most effective answer toward unsatisfactory adherence. Limited number of publications assessing determinants of persistence with medication, and lack of those providing determinants of adherence to short-term treatment identify areas for future research.

3 January 2020 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEnrica Menditto
Enrica Menditto
VOValentina Orlando
Valentina Orlando
Giuseppe De RosaGiuseppe De Rosa
Giuseppe De Rosa
PMPaola Minghetti
Paola Minghetti
UMUmberto Musazzi
Umberto Musazzi
Isabel AlmeidaIsabel Almeida
Isabel Almeida
Medication adherence is a growing concern for public health and poor adherence to therapy has been associated with poor health outcomes and higher costs for patients. Interventions for improving adherence need to consider the characteristics of the individual therapeutic regimens according to the needs of the patients. In particular, geriatric and paediatric populations as well as dermatological patients have special needs/preferences that should be considered when designing drug products. Patient Centric Drug Product Pharmaceutical Design (PCDPD) offers the opportunity to meet the needs and preferences of patients. Packaging, orodispersible formulations, fixed dose combinations products, multiparticulate formulations, topical formulations and 3D printing are of particular relevance in a PCDPD process. These will be addressed in this review as well as their impact on medication adherence.

10 April 2023 in Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jean BousquetJean Bousquet
Jean Bousquet
EME. Melén
E. Melén
THT. Haahtela
T. Haahtela
GKG. H. Koppelman
G. H. Koppelman
ATAlkis Togias
Alkis Togias
Josep M. BoquéJosep M. Boqué
Josep M. Boqué
Asthma, rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis (AD) are interrelated clinical phenotypes that partly overlap in the human interactome. The concept of “one‐airway‐one‐disease,” coined over 20 years ago, is a simplistic approach of the links between upper‐ and lower‐airway allergic diseases. With new data, it is time to reassess the concept. This article reviews (i) the clinical observations that led to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA), (ii) new insights into polysensitization and multimorbidity, (iii) advances in mHealth for novel phenotype definitions, (iv) confirmation in canonical epidemiologic studies, (v) genomic findings, (vi) treatment approaches, and (vii) novel concepts on the onset of rhinitis and multimorbidity. One recent concept, bringing together upper‐ and lower‐airway allergic diseases with skin, gut, and neuropsychiatric multimorbidities, is the “Epithelial Barrier Hypothesis.” This review determined that the “one‐airway‐one‐disease” concept does not always hold true and that several phenotypes of disease can be defined. These phenotypes include an extreme “allergic” (asthma) phenotype combining asthma, rhinitis, and conjunctivitis. Rhinitis alone and rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity represent two distinct diseases with the following differences: (i) genomic and transcriptomic background (Toll‐Like Receptors and IL‐17 for rhinitis alone as a local disease; IL‐33 and IL‐5 for allergic and non‐allergic multimorbidity as a systemic disease), (ii) allergen sensitization patterns (mono‐ or pauci‐sensitization versus polysensitization), (iii) severity of symptoms, and (iv) treatment response. In conclusion, rhinitis alone (local disease) and rhinitis with asthma multimorbidity (systemic disease) should be considered as two distinct diseases, possibly modulated by the microbiome, and may be a model for understanding the epidemics of chronic and autoimmune diseases.

15 October 2023 in European Journal of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PKPrzemyslaw Kardas
Przemyslaw Kardas
Non-adherence to medication is a longstanding problem, profoundly affecting patient outcomes and sustainability of healthcare systems. Historically, non-adherence has been observed since the time of Hippocrates, however, when potent drugs became available in the midst of the 20th century, it became a pivotal concern. Despite numerous studies and interventions designed, medication adherence rates remain suboptimal, currently reaching about 50 % still, as described in WHO report two decades ago. What is worse, many healthcare professionals feel neither responsible nor able to change it. Enhancing adherence requires in-depth understanding of the concept, as many intuitive approaches fail to work. For example, contrary to expectations, patient education alone proves insufficient when addressing this issue. Both behavioural models and recent experience reflecting low acceptance of COVID-19 vaccinations strongly suggest that patients' decisions are driven by emotions, which often results in intentional non-adherence. Several technical innovations, such as smart inhalers and electronic pill dispensers, offer potential solutions. However, their effectiveness varies, and standardized certification procedures are lacking. Altogether, technical solutions do not eliminate the problem entirely. To move forward, social and health system innovation is equally needed. Multiple stakeholders could benefit from improved adherence, therefore their greater involvement is advisable to create an adherence-supporting environment. In conclusion, despite available evidence-based interventions, non-adherence remains a complex challenge. Technical and social innovations, combined with a shift in policy priorities, could lead to improved medication adherence and better patient outcomes. The global tide of non-communicable chronic conditions, and aging of societies urges us to take this problem seriously.

24 November 2022 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NKNataliia Khanyk
Nataliia Khanyk
BHBohdan Hromovyk
Bohdan Hromovyk
OLOksana Levytska
Oksana Levytska
TATamas Agh
Tamas Agh
BWBjörn Wettermark
Björn Wettermark
PKPrzemyslaw Kardas
Przemyslaw Kardas
Due to the Russian invasion, which started on 24 February 2022, the Ukrainian healthcare system is facing multiple challenges. A great number of healthcare facilities have been destroyed, while availability of other ones is often limited due to a lack of qualified medical staff. Certain services, e.g. cancer therapies, have been seriously disrupted. Moreover, millions of Ukrainians with chronic conditions are also suffering as due to war-related problems with execution of their long-term therapies. Availability of drugs is particularly limited in the occupied regions. According to the national statistics, as of 18 August 2022, about 505 pharmacies were damaged in Eastern Ukraine and 47 completely ruined. Moreover, the invaders have been blocking humanitarian aid provided to these territories by the Ukrainian government or other countries. Fortunately, in the areas controlled by the Government of Ukraine, the acute shortage of medicines, observed at the beginning of the war, has already been eliminated. Nevertheless, not all drugs are now fully available, even in the areas where no military attacks occur. The economic availability of drugs is also profoundly influenced by the significant increase in the cost of medications and the fall in average salaries. The Government of Ukraine is trying to minimise the impact of these war-related challenges by adopting a new legislation. This includes, among others, simplification of procedures for licensing, quality control and import of medicinal products to Ukraine. Other measures involve securing displaced people with the option of benefiting from local healthcare facilities, broadening the scope of the ePrescription system, authorizing primary care doctors to issue prescriptions to refugees, increasing the number of drugs reimbursed for long-term therapies, etc. These solutions, however, cannot balance all the harmful consequences the war in Ukraine brings in terms of maintenance of long-term therapies. Therefore, in order to minimise this negative impact, Ukraine still needs urgent international support in this area.

23 December 2024 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPrzemyslaw Kardas
Przemyslaw Kardas
BBBryan Bennett
Bryan Bennett
BBBijan Borah
Bijan Borah
MBMichel Burnier
Michel Burnier
CDChristopher Daly
Christopher Daly
TÁTamás Ágh
Tamás Ágh
Background: Non-adherence to medication remains a persistent and significant challenge, with profound implications for patient outcomes and the long-term sustainability of healthcare systems. Two decades ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) dedicated its seminal report to adherence to long-term therapies, catalysing notable changes that advanced both research and practice in medication adherence. The aim of this paper was to identify the most important progress made over the last 2 decades in medication adherence management and to initiate a discussion on future objectives, suggesting priority targets for the next 20 years.Methods: This research used the WHO adherence model as a theoretical framework, categorizing adherence factors into five dimensions: health system, therapy, condition, patient-related, and socioeconomic. Ten international experts, five from Europe and five from the United States, were assigned to these dimensions and participated in structured online discussions. Initially, based on their desk reviews, experts identified significant achievements and future targets. They then ranked these items and provided feedback through several rounds, ensuring anonymity to minimize bias, ultimately reaching a consensus. This iterative process allowed for the creation of top-ten lists of past achievements and future targets for medication adherence management over the next 20 years.Results: Analysis of the top-ranked achievements affirms that notable progress has been made in medication adherence research and practice over the past 20 years, with increased awareness and a surge in dedicated scientific publications. Despite these advancements, non-adherence remains a prevalent issue, underscoring the need for the ongoing implementation of innovative solutions identified in this work, such as novel digital health solutions. Interdisciplinary collaboration and a holistic understanding of patient behaviours and socio-economic factors are crucial.Conclusion: While refraining from imposing a rigid “adherence Decalogue,” we are confident that this overview of recent achievements and the curated selection of future targets may provide a useful foundation for further discussions aimed at advancing medication adherence management. Our results call for a paradigm shift, advocating the repositioning of medication adherence on national agendas and underscoring the necessity for an adherence-supportive ecosystem that extends beyond mere patient support.