Basanth Babu Eedara

Dr. Basanth Babu Eedara

The UA College of Pharmacy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2015 in European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SISpandana Inugala
Spandana Inugala
BEBasanth Babu Eedara
Basanth Babu Eedara
SSSharath Sunkavalli
Sharath Sunkavalli
RDRajeshri Dhurke
Rajeshri Dhurke
PKPrabhakar Kandadi
Prabhakar Kandadi
SBSuresh Bandari
Suresh Bandari

5 September 2022 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WAWafaa Alabsi
Wafaa Alabsi
BEBasanth Babu Eedara
Basanth Babu Eedara
DEDavid Encinas-Basurto
David Encinas-Basurto
RPRobin Polt
Robin Polt
Heidi M. MansourHeidi M. Mansour
Heidi M. Mansour
Central nervous system (CNS) disorders, such as psychiatric disorders, neurodegeneration, chronic pain, stroke, brain tumor, spinal cord injury, and many other CNS diseases, would hugely benefit from specific and potent peptide pharmaceuticals and their low inherent toxicity. The delivery of peptides to the brain is challenging due to their low metabolic stability, which decreases their duration of action, poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and their incompatibility with oral administration, typically resulting in the need for parenteral administration. These challenges limit peptides’ clinical application and explain the interest in alternative routes of peptide administration, particularly nose-to-brain (N-to-B) delivery, which allows protein and peptide drugs to reach the brain noninvasively. N-to-B delivery can be a convenient method for rapidly targeting the CNS, bypassing the BBB, and minimizing systemic exposure; the olfactory and trigeminal nerves provide a unique pathway to the brain and the external environment. This review highlights the intranasal delivery of drugs, focusing on peptide delivery, illustrating various clinical applications, nasal delivery devices, and the scope and limitations of this approach.

14 July 2021 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BEBasanth Babu Eedara
Basanth Babu Eedara
WAWafaa Alabsi
Wafaa Alabsi
DEDavid Encinas-Basurto
David Encinas-Basurto
RPRobin Polt
Robin Polt
JLJulie Ledford
Julie Ledford
Heidi M. MansourHeidi M. Mansour
Heidi M. Mansour
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has produced a global pandemic. As of 22 June 2021, 178 million people have been affected worldwide, and 3.87 million people have died from COVID-19. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the United States, COVID-19 virus is primarily transmitted between people through respiratory droplets and contact routes. Since the location of initial infection and disease progression is primarily through the lungs, the inhalation delivery of drugs directly to the lungs may be the most appropriate route of administration for treating COVID-19. This review article aims to present possible inhalation therapeutics and vaccines for the treatment of COVID-19 symptoms. This review covers the comparison between SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV/MERS, inhalation therapeutics for the treatment of COVID-19 symptoms, and vaccines for preventing infection, as well as the current clinical status of inhaled therapeutics and vaccines.

1 May 2018 in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEBasanth Babu Eedara
Basanth Babu Eedara
BRBhamini Rangnekar
Bhamini Rangnekar
CDColin Doyle
Colin Doyle
ACAlex Cavallaro
Alex Cavallaro
Shyamal DasShyamal Das
Shyamal Das

5 June 2013 in Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BEBasanth Babu Eedara
Basanth Babu Eedara
Prabhakar Reddy VeerareddyPrabhakar Reddy Veerareddy
Prabhakar Reddy Veerareddy
RJRaju Jukanti
Raju Jukanti
SBSuresh Bandari
Suresh Bandari
The aim of the present study was to improve the dissolution, permeability and therefore oral bioavailability of the fexofenadine hydrochloride (FEX), by preparing lipid surfactant based dispersions using self-emulsifying carriers, i.e. Gelucire 44/14 (GLC) and d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (Vitamin E TPGS or TPGS). The reprecipitation studies were conducted using these carriers to evaluate inhibition of reprecipitation by maintaining super saturation state. The aqueous solubility of the FEX was increased linearly with increasing GLC, TPGS concentrations as verified by the phase solubility studies. The dispersions of FEX were prepared in different drug/GLC (GD) and drug/TPGS (TD) ratios by melt method and evaluated. The prepared dispersions showed improved dissolution rate in distilled water as dissolution media and highest dissolution rate was achieved with dispersions prepared using TPGS. The solid state characterization was carried by differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy indicated reduced crystallinity of the drug. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed the compatibility of drug with carriers. The ex vivo permeation studies conducted using intestinal gut sac technique, resulted in reduced efflux of the drug by inhibiting intestinal P-glycoprotein from the dispersions. The in situ perfusion studies and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in male wistar rats showed improved absorption and oral bioavailability from the prepared dispersions as compared to pure drug.

19 January 2017 in Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSuresh Bandari
Suresh Bandari
VDVenkateshwara Rao Dronam
Venkateshwara Rao Dronam
BEBasanth Babu Eedara
Basanth Babu Eedara