Tess Russo

Dr. Tess Russo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 May 2017 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSasmita Sahoo
Sasmita Sahoo
TRTess Russo
Tess Russo
JEJ. Elliott
J. Elliott
IFIan Foster
Ian Foster
Climate, groundwater extraction, and surface water flows have complex nonlinear relationships with groundwater level in agricultural regions. To better understand the relative importance of each driver and predict groundwater level change, we develop a new ensemble modeling framework based on spectral analysis, machine learning, and uncertainty analysis, as an alternative to complex and computationally expensive physical models. We apply and evaluate this new approach in the context of two aquifer systems supporting agricultural production in the United States: the High Plains aquifer (HPA) and the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer (MRVA). We select input data sets by using a combination of mutual information, genetic algorithms, and lag analysis, and then use the selected data sets in a Multilayer Perceptron network architecture to simulate seasonal groundwater level change. As expected, model results suggest that irrigation demand has the highest influence on groundwater level change for a majority of the wells. The subset of groundwater observations not used in model training or cross‐validation correlates strongly (R > 0.8) with model results for 88 and 83% of the wells in the HPA and MRVA, respectively. In both aquifer systems, the error in the modeled cumulative groundwater level change during testing (2003–2012) was less than 2 m over a majority of the area. We conclude that our modeling framework can serve as an alternative approach to simulating groundwater level change and water availability, especially in regions where subsurface properties are unknown.

23 January 2017 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TRTess Russo
Tess Russo
ULUpmanu Lall
Upmanu Lall

12 December 2014 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTess Russo
Tess Russo
KAKatherine Alfredo
Katherine Alfredo
Joshua FisherJoshua Fisher
Joshua Fisher
Sustainable water management (SWM) requires allocating between competing water sector demands, and balancing the financial and social resources required to support necessary water systems. The objective of this review is to assess SWM in three sectors: urban, agricultural, and natural systems. This review explores the following questions: (1) How is SWM defined and evaluated? (2) What are the challenges associated with sustainable development in each sector? (3) What are the areas of greatest potential improvement in urban and agricultural water management systems? And (4) What role does country development status have in SWM practices? The methods for evaluating water management practices range from relatively simple indicator methods to integration of multiple models, depending on the complexity of the problem and resources of the investigators. The two key findings and recommendations for meeting SWM objectives are: (1) all forms of water must be considered usable, and reusable, water resources; and (2) increasing agricultural crop water production represents the largest opportunity for reducing total water consumption, and will be required to meet global food security needs. The level of regional development should not dictate sustainability objectives, however local infrastructure conditions and financial capabilities should inform the details of water system design and evaluation.

9 June 2017 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBeth Hoagland
Beth Hoagland
TRTess Russo
Tess Russo
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
LHLillian Hill
Lillian Hill
JKJason Kaye
Jason Kaye
SBSusan L. Brantley
Susan L. Brantley
Complex subsurface flow dynamics impact the storage, routing, and transport of water and solutes to streams in headwater catchments. Many of these hydrogeologic processes are indirectly reflected in observations of stream chemistry responses to rain events, also known as concentration‐discharge (CQ) relations. Identifying the relative importance of subsurface flows to stream CQ relationships is often challenging in headwater environments due to spatial and temporal variability. Therefore, this study combines a diverse set of methods, including tracer injection tests, cation exchange experiments, geochemical analyses, and numerical modeling, to map groundwater‐surface water interactions along a first‐order, sandstone stream (Garner Run) in the Appalachian Mountains of central Pennsylvania. The primary flow paths to the stream include preferential flow through the unsaturated zone (“interflow”), flow discharging from a spring, and groundwater discharge. Garner Run stream inherits geochemical signatures from geochemical reactions occurring along each of these flow paths. In addition to end‐member mixing effects on CQ, we find that the exchange of solutes, nutrients, and water between the hyporheic zone and the main stream channel is a relevant control on the chemistry of Garner Run. CQ relationships for Garner Run were compared to prior results from a nearby headwater catchment overlying shale bedrock (Shale Hills). At the sandstone site, solutes associated with organo‐mineral associations in the hyporheic zone influence CQ, while CQ trends in the shale catchment are affected by preferential flow through hillslope swales. The difference in CQ trends document how the lithology and catchment hydrology control CQ relationships.

16 May 2017 in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTess Russo
Tess Russo
KTK. Tully
K. Tully
CPC. Palm
C. Palm
CNC. Neill
C. Neill
Meeting food security requirements in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) will require increasing fertilizer use to improve crop yields, however excess fertilization can cause environmental and public health problems in surface and groundwater. Determining the threshold of reasonable fertilizer application in SSA requires an understanding of flow dynamics and nutrient transport in under-studied, tropical soils experiencing seasonal rainfall. We estimated leaching flux in Yala, Kenya on a maize field that received from 0 to 200 kg ha−1 of nitrogen (N) fertilizer. Soil pore water concentration measurements during two growing seasons were coupled with results from a numerical fluid flow model to calculate the daily flux of nitrate-nitrogen (NO3 −-N). Modeled NO3 −-N losses to below 200 cm for 1 year ranged from 40 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the 75 kg N ha−1 year−1 treatment to 81 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the 200 kg N ha−1 treatment. The highest soil pore water NO3 −-N concentrations and NO3 −-N leaching fluxes occurred on the highest N application plots, however there was a poor correlation between N application rate and NO3 −-N leaching for the remaining N application rates. The drought in the second study year resulted in higher pore water NO3 −-N concentrations, while NO3 −-N leaching was disproportionately smaller than the decrease in precipitation. The lack of a strong correlation between NO3 −-N leaching and N application rate, and a large decrease in flux between 120 and 200 cm suggest processes that influence NO3 −-N retention in soils below 200 cm will ultimately control NO3 −-N leaching at the watershed scale.

14 March 2016 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSasmita Sahoo
Sasmita Sahoo
TRTess Russo
Tess Russo
ULUpmanu Lall
Upmanu Lall
Click on the article title to read more.