Due to COVID-19 outbreak, to lighten the burden of acute and critical care hospitals, some respiratory rehabilitation departments have been used to host patients with COVID-19 in the post-acute phase. This new and unexpected situation required a change of roles and scheduling of the rehabilitation teams. In this manuscript we describe the unexpected and urgent organizational change of the Cardio-Pulmonary Rehabilitation (CPR) service during the COVID-19 emergency in a Northern Italian rehabilitation hospital, focusing on the Respiratory Physiotherapists’ (RPTs) role. A quick three-days complete reorganization of the entire hospital was needed. A COVID-19 care team including a multidisciplinary panel of physicians, nurses, and RPTs was quickly performed to manage 90 beds for post acute patients with COVID-19. Within the team, the RPTs changed their shifts, so as to be available 16h per day, 7 days out of 7. Remodelled tasks in charge of RPTs were: oxygen therapy daily monitoring, non invasive ventilation (NIV) and continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) delivery, pronation and postural changes to improve oxygenation, reconditioning with leg/arm cranking and exercises, initial and final patients’ functional assessment by short-physical performance battery (SPPB) and 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1-STS) to evaluate motor conditions and exercise-induced oxygen desaturation. Three “what-to-do” algorithms were developed to guide: i) oxygen de-escalation by reducing inhaled fraction of oxygen (FiO2); ii) oxygenation improvement through the use of Venturi mask; iii) reconditioning and physical activity. One-hundred seventy patients were treated in one month. As main topics, RPTs have been involved in oxygen therapy management in almost a third of the admitted patients, reconditioning exercises in 60% of the cases, and initial and final functional motor capacity assessment in all patients. Details of activities performed by the RPT in one typical working day are also shown. Our reorganization has exploited the professional skills and clinical expertise of the RPTs. This re-organization can provide practical insights to other facilities that are facing this crisis, and may be a starting point for implementing post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. Future studies will have to improve and review this organization.

Aims: The 2016 European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure classified cardiac rehabilitation as a mandatory class I intervention. We aimed to analyse in heart failure patients the impact of an in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation programme on all-cause mortality and readmissions. Methods: From the Lombardy healthcare administrative database, we analysed in patients with incident heart failure, from 2005 to 2012, the number of all hospitalisations, cardiac rehabilitation admissions, post-discharge deaths, outpatient drug prescriptions and visits. We divided patients into hospitalised for heart failure in acute care only (group A) versus patients with one or more admission to cardiac rehabilitation for an in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation programme (group B). Results: Of 140,552 incident cases, 100,843 (71%) were in group A and 39,709 (29%) in group B. Patients in group B had 3.26 ± 1.78 admissions to acute care before referral to an in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation programme. Male gender, age in women and comorbidities (more than two) were higher in group B ( P < 0.0001). Patients in group B had a higher number of interventional procedures ( P < 0.0001), drug prescription and outpatient visit rate ( P < 0.0001). Total mortality was 30% in group A versus 29% in group B. At Cox and logistic regression analyses, after adjustment for covariates, group B had a significantly lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.5768, 95% confidence interval 0.5650–0.5888, P < 0.0001) and readmissions (0.7997, 0.7758–0.8244, P < 0.0001) than group A. Conclusion: This study showed in a large population of heart failure patients that in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation is associated with a reduction of all-cause mortality and rehospitalisations in heart failure. Given its potential significant benefit, referral of heart failure patients to an in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation programme should be promoted.

Management of chronic diseases in a progressively aging population is a major issue in western industrialized countries and telehealth is one way to ensure the continuity of care in chronic illness. We describe here our personal experience in a telehealth and telecare centre in Italy. Between January 2000 and December 2015, 1635 elderly patients (71% male) with one or more comorbidities have undergone a telehealth program tailored to their specific disease: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/chronic respiratory insufficiency; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/neuromuscular diseases; chronic heart failure (CHF); post-stroke; and post-cardiac surgery patients discharged from hospital after an acute event. COPD and CHF represent the majority of patients treated (accounting for 80%). Interventions performed by the nurse tutor account for 39–82% of all activities in the five different programs. Specialist second opinion represents 12–27% of the health staff activities. Previously reported results show a reduction of the re-hospitalization rate and costs, and increase in quality of life and patient satisfaction with the service. A multidisciplinary telehealth and telecare integrated approach can provide efficient management for the growing number of complex patients.

Background: The issue of how to optimize the routine use of tele-assistance (TA) in the clinical care remains to be addressed. Skills and costs of human resources represent the major component to care for chronic patients with TA. Methods: We investigated (1) the change in patient population, mortality, and staff utilization/cost during the first 5-year activity of a TA program (24-h availability of a call center, pulse oxygen device, and second medical opinion) dedicated to chronic respiratory failure patients and (2) the staff time dedicated to each new patient admitted to the service. Results: Three-hundred and ninty-six patients (age 64 ± 17 years; 296 men) were reviewed across 5 years of activity. Patients followed/year increased over time, particularly for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis subjects. Calls/month dramatically increased from 60 to 290, with a 5-year number of calls equal to 12.952. The doctor's time dedicated to TA decreased over time, whereas the nurse's time increased allowing a cost saving of 39% when compared with budgeted salary costs. The number of home ventilated patients did not change, remaining over 78%. The mortality rate increased over time (from 6% to 11%). Both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and No-COPD patients used the TA service more frequently during the winter, and COPD used it also in the summer. Conclusions: A stable TA service dedicated to chronic respiratory failure may be reached after 4 years. Across years, (1) number of patients increased, with COPD and ventilated subjects being the most representative; (2) calls varied during seasons; (3) doctor's workload decreased, saving salary costs; and (4) each new enrolled patient may require 73 and 27 min/month of nurse and doctor, respectively.