Lalit Sehgal

Dr. Lalit Sehgal

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2011 in Molecular Biology of the Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HAHunain Alam
Hunain Alam
LSLalit Sehgal
Lalit Sehgal
SKSamrat Kundu
Samrat Kundu
SDSorab N. Dalal
Sorab N. Dalal
MVMilind M. Vaidya
Milind M. Vaidya
Keratins are cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins preferentially expressed by epithelial tissues in a site-specific and differentiation-dependent manner. The complex network of keratin filaments in stratified epithelia is tightly regulated during squamous cell differentiation. Keratin 14 (K14) is expressed in mitotically active basal layer cells, along with its partner keratin 5 (K5), and their expression is down-regulated as cells differentiate. Apart from the cytoprotective functions of K14, very little is known about K14 regulatory functions, since the K14 knockout mice show postnatal lethality. In this study, K14 expression was inhibited using RNA interference in cell lines derived from stratified epithelia to study the K14 functions in epithelial homeostasis. The K14 knockdown clones demonstrated substantial decreases in the levels of the K14 partner K5. These cells showed reduction in cell proliferation and delay in cell cycle progression, along with decreased phosphorylated Akt levels. K14 knockdown cells also exhibited enhanced levels of activated Notch1, involucrin, and K1. In addition, K14 knockdown AW13516 cells showed significant reduction in tumorigenicity. Our results suggest that K5 and K14 may have a role in maintenance of cell proliferation potential in the basal layer of stratified epithelia, modulating phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt–mediated cell proliferation and/or Notch1-dependent cell differentiation.

27 December 2007 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCh. Berger
Ch. Berger
LSLalit Sehgal
Lalit Sehgal
We reconsider the Feynman-Kislinger-Ravndal model applied to neutrino-excitation of baryon resonances. The effects of lepton mass are included, using the formalism of Kuzmin, Lyubushkin, and Naumov. In addition we take account of the pion-pole contribution to the hadronic axial vector current. Application of this new formalism to the reaction νμ+p→μ−+Δ++ at Eν∼1  GeV gives a suppressed cross section at small angles, in agreement with the screening correction in Adler’s forward-scattering theorem. Application to the process ντ+p→τ−+Δ++ at Eν∼7  GeV leads to the prediction of right-handed τ− polarization for forward-going leptons, in line with a calculation based on an isobar model. Our formalism represents an improved version of the Rein-Sehgal model, incorporating lepton mass effects in a manner consistent with partially conserved axial-vector current.

9 March 2009 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCh. Berger
Ch. Berger
LSLalit Sehgal
Lalit Sehgal
Coherent π+ and π° production in low energy neutrino reactions is discussed in the framework of the partially conserved axial vector current theory . The role of lepton mass effects in suppressing the π+ production is emphasized. Instead of using models of pion nucleus scattering, the available data on pion carbon scattering are implemented for an analysis of the partially conserved axial vector current theory prediction. Our results agree well with the published upper limits for π+ production but are much below the recent MiniBooNE result for π° production.

3 April 2014 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLalit Sehgal
Lalit Sehgal
RMR Mathur
R Mathur
FBF K Braun
F K Braun
JWJ F Wise
J F Wise
ZBZ Berkova
Z Berkova
FSF Samaniego
F Samaniego

11 May 2000 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FKFrank Krüger
Frank Krüger
LSLalit Sehgal
Lalit Sehgal
NSNita Sinha
Nita Sinha
RSRahul Sinha
Rahul Sinha
The short-distance Hamiltonian describing b→s(d)e−e+ in the standard model is used to obtain the decay spectrum of B¯→K−π+e−e+ and B¯→π−π+e−e+, assuming the Kπ and ππ systems to be the decay products of K* and ρ respectively. The specific features calculated are (i) the angular distribution of K− (or π−) in the K−π+ (or π−π+) center-of-mass (c.m.) frame, (ii) the angular distribution of e− in the e−e+ c.m. frame, and (iii) the correlation between the meson and lepton planes. We also derive CP-violating observables obtained by combining the above decays with the conjugate processes B→K+π−e−e+ and B→π−π+e−e+.

22 May 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBhawana George
Bhawana George
SCSayan Mullick Chowdhury
Sayan Mullick Chowdhury
AHAmber Hart
Amber Hart
ASAnuvrat Sircar
Anuvrat Sircar
SSSatishkumar Singh
Satishkumar Singh
NJNEERAJ JAIN
NEERAJ JAIN
Chronic activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling via Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is largely considered to be one of the primary mechanisms driving disease progression in B–Cell lymphomas. Although the BTK-targeting agent ibrutinib has shown promising clinical responses, the presence of primary or acquired resistance is common and often leads to dismal clinical outcomes. Resistance to ibrutinib therapy can be mediated through genetic mutations, up-regulation of alternative survival pathways, or other unknown factors that are not targeted by ibrutinib therapy. Understanding the key determinants, including tumor heterogeneity and rewiring of the molecular networks during disease progression and therapy, will assist exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. Towards the goal of overcoming ibrutinib resistance, multiple alternative therapeutic agents, including second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, have been discovered and tested in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. Although these agents have shown high response rates alone or in combination with ibrutinib in ibrutinib-treated relapsed/refractory(R/R) lymphoma patients, overall clinical outcomes have not been satisfactory due to drug-associated toxicities and incomplete remission. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of ibrutinib resistance development in B-cell lymphoma including complexities associated with genomic alterations, non-genetic acquired resistance, cancer stem cells, and the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, we focus our discussion on more comprehensive views of recent developments in therapeutic strategies to overcome ibrutinib resistance, including novel BTK inhibitors, clinical therapeutic agents, proteolysis-targeting chimeras and immunotherapy regimens.