Martijn Schonewille

Dr. Martijn Schonewille

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2014 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HZHaibo Zhou
Haibo Zhou
ZLZhanmin Lin
Zhanmin Lin
KVKai Voges
Kai Voges
CJChiheng Ju
Chiheng Ju
ZGZhenyu Gao
Zhenyu Gao
MSMartijn Schonewille
Martijn Schonewille
Due to the uniform cyto-architecture of the cerebellar cortex, its overall physiological characteristics have traditionally been considered to be homogeneous. In this study, we show in awake mice at rest that spiking activity of Purkinje cells, the sole output cells of the cerebellar cortex, differs between cerebellar modules and correlates with their expression of the glycolytic enzyme aldolase C or zebrin. Simple spike and complex spike frequencies were significantly higher in Purkinje cells located in zebrin-negative than zebrin-positive modules. The difference in simple spike frequency persisted when the synaptic input to, but not intrinsic activity of, Purkinje cells was manipulated. Blocking TRPC3, the effector channel of a cascade of proteins that have zebrin-like distribution patterns, attenuated the simple spike frequency difference. Our results indicate that zebrin-discriminated cerebellar modules operate at different frequencies, which depend on activation of TRPC3, and that this property is relevant for all cerebellar functions.

6 June 2018 in The Cerebellum
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARichard Apps
Richard Apps
RHRichard Hawkes
Richard Hawkes
SASho Aoki
Sho Aoki
FBFredrik Bengtsson
Fredrik Bengtsson
ABAmanda M. Brown
Amanda M. Brown
TRTom J. H. Ruigrok
Tom J. H. Ruigrok
The compartmentalization of the cerebellum into modules is often used to discuss its function. What, exactly, can be considered a module, how do they operate, can they be subdivided and do they act individually or in concert are only some of the key questions discussed in this consensus paper. Experts studying cerebellar compartmentalization give their insights on the structure and function of cerebellar modules, with the aim of providing an up-to-date review of the extensive literature on this subject. Starting with an historical perspective indicating that the basis of the modular organization is formed by matching olivocorticonuclear connectivity, this is followed by consideration of anatomical and chemical modular boundaries, revealing a relation between anatomical, chemical, and physiological borders. In addition, the question is asked what the smallest operational unit of the cerebellum might be. Furthermore, it has become clear that chemical diversity of Purkinje cells also results in diversity of information processing between cerebellar modules. An additional important consideration is the relation between modular compartmentalization and the organization of the mossy fiber system, resulting in the concept of modular plasticity. Finally, examination of cerebellar output patterns suggesting cooperation between modules and recent work on modular aspects of emotional behavior are discussed. Despite the general consensus that the cerebellum has a modular organization, many questions remain. The authors hope that this joint review will inspire future cerebellar research so that we are better able to understand how this brain structure makes its vital contribution to behavior in its most general form.

31 May 2006 in Journal of Comparative Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMartijn Schonewille
Martijn Schonewille
CLChongde Luo
Chongde Luo
TRTom J. H. Ruigrok
Tom J. H. Ruigrok
JVJan Voogd
Jan Voogd
MSMatthew T. Schmolesky
Matthew T. Schmolesky
CZChris I. De Zeeuw
Chris I. De Zeeuw

6 January 2020 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGiorgio Grasselli
Giorgio Grasselli
HBHenk-Jan Boele
Henk-Jan Boele
HTHeather K. Titley
Heather K. Titley
NBNora Bradford
Nora Bradford
LBLisa van Beers
Lisa van Beers
CHChristian Hansel
Christian Hansel
Neurons store information by changing synaptic input weights. In addition, they can adjust their membrane excitability to alter spike output. Here, we demonstrate a role of such “intrinsic plasticity” in behavioral learning in a mouse model that allows us to detect specific consequences of absent excitability modulation. Mice with a Purkinje-cell–specific knockout (KO) of the calcium-activated K+ channel SK2 (L7-SK2) show intact vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain adaptation but impaired eyeblink conditioning (EBC), which relies on the ability to establish associations between stimuli, with the eyelid closure itself depending on a transient suppression of spike firing. In these mice, the intrinsic plasticity of Purkinje cells is prevented without affecting long-term depression or potentiation at their parallel fiber (PF) input. In contrast to the typical spike pattern of EBC-supporting zebrin-negative Purkinje cells, L7-SK2 neurons show reduced background spiking but enhanced excitability. Thus, SK2 plasticity and excitability modulation are essential for specific forms of motor learning.

5 September 2019 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BWBin Wu
Bin Wu
FBFrançois Gc Blot
François Gc Blot
AWAaron Benson Wong
Aaron Benson Wong
COCatarina Osório
Catarina Osório
YAYouri Adolfs
Youri Adolfs
MSMartijn Schonewille
Martijn Schonewille
Despite the canonical homogeneous character of its organization, the cerebellum plays differential computational roles in distinct sensorimotor behaviors. Previously, we showed that Purkinje cell (PC) activity differs between zebrin-negative (Z–) and zebrin-positive (Z+) modules (Zhou et al., 2014). Here, using gain-of-function and loss-of-function mouse models, we show that transient receptor potential cation channel C3 (TRPC3) controls the simple spike activity of Z–, but not Z+ PCs. In addition, TRPC3 regulates complex spike rate and their interaction with simple spikes, exclusively in Z– PCs. At the behavioral level, TRPC3 loss-of-function mice show impaired eyeblink conditioning, which is related to Z– modules, whereas compensatory eye movement adaptation, linked to Z+ modules, is intact. Together, our results indicate that TRPC3 is a major contributor to the cellular heterogeneity that introduces distinct physiological properties in PCs, conjuring functional heterogeneity in cerebellar sensorimotor integration.

11 May 2021 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GBGerrit Cornelis Beekhof
Gerrit Cornelis Beekhof
COCatarina Osorio
Catarina Osorio
JWJoshua J White
Joshua J White
SZScott van Zoomeren
Scott van Zoomeren
HSHannah van der Stok
Hannah van der Stok
MSMartijn Schonewille
Martijn Schonewille
Distinct populations of Purkinje cells (PCs) with unique molecular and connectivity features are at the core of the modular organization of the cerebellum. Previously, we showed that firing activity of PCs differs between ZebrinII-positive and ZebrinII-negative cerebellar modules (Zhou et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2019). Here, we investigate the timing and extent of PC differentiation during development in mice. We found that several features of PCs, including activity levels, dendritic arborization, axonal shape and climbing fiber input, develop differentially between nodular and anterior PC populations. Although all PCs show a particularly rapid development in the second postnatal week, anterior PCs typically have a prolonged physiological and dendritic maturation. In line herewith, younger mice exhibit attenuated anterior-dependent eyeblink conditioning, but faster nodular-dependent compensatory eye movement adaptation. Our results indicate that specific cerebellar regions have unique developmental timelines which match with their related, specific forms of cerebellum-dependent behaviors.