Since 2006, several different groups have computed geoid and/or quasigeoid (quasi/geoid) models for the Auvergne test area in central France using various approaches. In this contribution, we compute and compare quasigeoid models for Auvergne using Curtin University of Technology’s and the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology’s approaches. These approaches differ in many ways, such as their treatment of the input data, choice of type of spherical harmonic model (combined or satellite-only), form and sequence of correction terms applied, and different modified Stokes’s kernels (deterministic or stochastic). We have also compared our results with most of the previously reported studies over Auvergne in order to seek any improvements with respect to time [exceptions are when different subsets of data have been used]. All studies considered here compare the computed quasigeoid models with the same 75 GPS-levelling heights over Auvergne. The standard deviation for almost all of the computations (without any fitting) is of the order of 30–40 mm, so there is not yet any clear indication whether any approach is necessarily better than any other nor improving over time. We also recommend more standardisation on the presentation of quasi/geoid comparisons with GPS-levelling data so that results from different approaches over the same areas can be compared more objectively.

SUMMARY: Computation of gravimetric terrain corrections (TCs) is a numerical challenge, especially when using very high-resolution (say, ∼30 m or less) digital elevation models (DEMs). TC computations can use spatial or/and spectral techniques: Spatial domain methods are more exact but can be very time-consuming; the discrete/fast Fourier transform (D/FFT) implementation of a binomial expansion is efficient, but fails to achieve a convergent solution for terrain slopes >45°. We show that this condition must be satisfied for each and every computation-roving point pair in the whole integration domain, not just at or near the computation points. A combination of spatial and spectral methods has been advocated by some through dividing the integration domain into inner and outer zones, where the TC is computed from the superposition of analytical mass-prism integration and the D/FFT. However, there remain two unresolved issues with this combined approach: (1) deciding upon a radius that best separates the inner and outer zones and (2) analytical mass-prism integration in the inner zone remains time-consuming, particularly for high-resolution DEMs. This paper provides a solution by proposing: (1) three methods to define the radius separating the inner and outer zones and (2) a numerical solution for near-zone TC computations based on the trapezoidal and Simpson's rules that is sufficiently accurate w.r.t. the exact analytical solution, but which can reduce the computation time by almost 50 per cent.

With the progress in Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technology, accurate geoid modelling has started to play an essential role in geodetic applications such as establishing height datum as a continuous surface model and related vertical control for infrastructure projects. Thus, numerous geoid modelling methods have been offered since 1990’s, each of them has its own algorithm and approximation theories. Classical Stokes-Helmert is one of the most well-known methods all over the world by geodetic communities. However, a user-friendly software package of the method is not publicly accessible on the Internet. Therefore, a compact and user-friendly software package “CSHSOFT” is developed and presented for scholars in this field. A fractionated programming strategy has been treated to build individual components striving high accuracy and computational efficiency for geoid heights. Subsequently, the CSHSOFT is simply tested to construct a geoid model in the mountainous area in Auvergne test-bed where several geoid modelling techniques are implemented. Afterward, the new geoid model of the region is externally evaluated by GNSS-levelling data in terms of rigorous orthometric heights. The fitting statistics of 2.75 cm and 0.36 ppm in absolute and relative height differences fairly indicate that the CSHSOFT is a vigorous tool for gravimetric geoid modelling, and can be comfortably employed for geoscientific and technical studies.

This paper aims to identify most suitable global geopotential model (GGM) for India, by comparing 15 GGMs developed through 1996 to 2017. The GGM derived geoid undulation values are compared with the geometrical undulation values obtained from GNSS/levelling data on Indian vertical datum. A correction term is added to the computed GGM derived geoid undulation value after fitting three-, four-, five- and seven-parameter models to account for bias and tilt between local geometric Indian vertical datum and global gravimetric vertical datum. The results indicate that EGM2008 model is the best GGM available for India with root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.28 m, without model fitting. However, after considering the systematic errors in the two datums with seven-parameter model, GECO GGM has shown significantly better results with RMSE of 0.19 m for India.