Marco Goeijenbier

Mr. Marco Goeijenbier


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 August 2012 in Journal of Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMarco Goeijenbier
Marco Goeijenbier
MWM. van Wissen
M. van Wissen
CWC. van de Weg
C. van de Weg
EJE. Jong
E. Jong
VGV.E.A. Gerdes
V.E.A. Gerdes
EGE.C.M. van Gorp
E.C.M. van Gorp

7 January 2016 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Kirsty ShortKirsty Short
Kirsty Short
JKJennifer Kasper
Jennifer Kasper
SAStijn van der Aa
Stijn van der Aa
AAArno C. Andeweg
Arno C. Andeweg
FZFatiha Zaaraoui-Boutahar
Fatiha Zaaraoui-Boutahar
PDPadraig Duignan
Padraig Duignan
A major cause of respiratory failure during influenza A virus (IAV) infection is damage to the epithelial–endothelial barrier of the pulmonary alveolus. Damage to this barrier results in flooding of the alveolar lumen with proteinaceous oedema fluid, erythrocytes and inflammatory cells. To date, the exact roles of pulmonary epithelial and endothelial cells in this process remain unclear.Here, we used anin vitroco-culture model to understand how IAV damages the pulmonary epithelial–endothelial barrier. Human epithelial cells were seeded on the upper half of a transwell membrane while human endothelial cells were seeded on the lower half. These cells were then grown in co-culture and IAV was added to the upper chamber.We showed that the addition of IAV (H1N1 and H5N1 subtypes) resulted in significant barrier damage. Interestingly, we found that, while endothelial cells mounted a pro-inflammatory/pro-coagulant response to a viral infection in the adjacent epithelial cells, damage to the alveolar epithelial–endothelial barrier occurred independently of endothelial cells. Rather, barrier damage was associated with disruption of tight junctions amongst epithelial cells, and specifically with loss of tight junction protein claudin-4.Taken together, these data suggest that maintaining epithelial cell integrity is key in reducing pulmonary oedema during IAV infection.

20 February 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMatthijs Raadsen
Matthijs Raadsen
JTJustin Du Toit
Justin Du Toit
TLThomas Langerak
Thomas Langerak
BBBas Van Bussl
Bas Van Bussl
EGEric C.M. van Gorp
Eric C.M. van Gorp
MGMarco Goeijenbier
Marco Goeijenbier
Thrombocytopenia, which signifies a low platelet count usually below 150 × 109/L, is a common finding following or during many viral infections. In clinical medicine, mild thrombocytopenia, combined with lymphopenia in a patient with signs and symptoms of an infectious disease, raises the suspicion of a viral infection. This phenomenon is classically attributed to platelet consumption due to inflammation-induced coagulation, sequestration from the circulation by phagocytosis and hypersplenism, and impaired platelet production due to defective megakaryopoiesis or cytokine-induced myelosuppression. All these mechanisms, while plausible and supported by substantial evidence, regard platelets as passive bystanders during viral infection. However, platelets are increasingly recognized as active players in the (antiviral) immune response and have been shown to interact with cells of the innate and adaptive immune system as well as directly with viruses. These findings can be of interest both for understanding the pathogenesis of viral infectious diseases and predicting outcome. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the literature currently available on various mechanisms within the relationship between thrombocytopenia and virus infections.

1 December 2014 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJoost H C M Kreijtz
Joost H C M Kreijtz
MGMarco Goeijenbier
Marco Goeijenbier
FMFleur M Moesker
Fleur M Moesker
LDLennert van Den Dries
Lennert van Den Dries
SGSimone Goeijenbier
Simone Goeijenbier
AOAlbert D M E Osterhaus
Albert D M E Osterhaus

27 August 2020 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LDLaura Doornekamp
Laura Doornekamp
LLLeanne van Leeuwen
Leanne van Leeuwen
EGEric C.M. van Gorp
Eric C.M. van Gorp
HVHelene Voeten
Helene Voeten
MGMarco Goeijenbier
Marco Goeijenbier
Vaccination uptake has decreased globally in recent years, with a subsequent rise of vaccine-preventable diseases. Travellers, immunocompromised patients (ICP), and healthcare workers (HCW) are groups at increased risk for (severe) infectious diseases due to their behaviour, health, or occupation, respectively. While targeted vaccination guidelines are available, vaccination uptake seems low. In this review, we give a comprehensive overview of determinants—based on the integrated change model—predicting vaccination uptake in these groups. In travellers, low perceived risk of infection and low awareness of vaccination recommendations contributed to low uptake. Additionally, ICP were often unaware of the recommended vaccinations. A physician’s recommendation is strongly correlated with higher uptake. Furthermore, ICP appeared to be mainly concerned about the risks of vaccination and fear of deterioration of their underlying disease. For HCW, perceived risk of (the severity of) infection for themselves and for their patients together with perceived benefits of vaccination contribute most to their vaccination behaviour. As the determinants that affect uptake are numerous and diverse, we argue that future studies and interventions should be based on multifactorial health behaviour models, especially for travellers and ICP as only a limited number of such studies is available yet.

13 March 2015 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNatalie B. Cleton
Natalie B. Cleton
GGGert-Jan Godeke
Gert-Jan Godeke
JRJohan Reimerink
Johan Reimerink
MBMathias F. Beersma
Mathias F. Beersma
HDH Rogier van Doorn
H Rogier van Doorn
CRChantal B. E. M. Reusken
Chantal B. E. M. Reusken
The family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus, holds many of the world’s most prevalent arboviral diseases that are also considered the most important travel related arboviral infections. In most cases, flavivirus diagnosis in travelers is primarily based on serology as viremia is often low and typically has already been reduced to undetectable levels when symptoms set in and patients seek medical attention. Serological differentiation between flaviviruses and the false-positive results caused by vaccination and cross-reactivity among the different species, are problematic for surveillance and diagnostics of flaviviruses. Their partially overlapping geographic distribution and symptoms, combined with increase in travel, and preexisting antibodies due to flavivirus vaccinations, expand the need for rapid and reliable multiplex diagnostic tests to supplement currently used methods. We describe the development of a multiplex serological protein microarray using recombinant NS1 proteins for detection of medically important viruses within the genus Flavivirus. Sera from clinical flavivirus patients were used for primary development of the protein microarray. Results show a high IgG and IgM sensitivity and specificity for individual NS1 antigens, and limited cross reactivity, even within serocomplexes. In addition, the serology based on this array allows for discrimination between infection and vaccination response for JEV vaccine, and no cross-reactivity with TBEV and YFV vaccine induced antibodies when testing for antibodies to other flaviviruses. Based on these data, multiplex NS1-based protein microarray is a promising tool for surveillance and diagnosis of flaviviruses. The number of international travelers has increased dramatically in recent decades. This has contributed to the increase in infectious diseases in travelers which are not present in their countries of origin and so may cause a threat to the public health. Viruses transmitted by biting insects (vector-borne viruses) are an important group within these travel-related diseases. They are found across the world and can cause debilitating and life-threatening symptoms, like inflammation of the brain or excessive bleeding. Many of these diseases are difficult to distinguish from each other. They cause comparable symptoms and are genetically closely related. Testing for long lists of diseases is time consuming and expensive. Here we develop a novel testing tool that allows doctors and researchers to test for multiple viruses with just one test. The method, which uses a specific part of the virus that makes distinguishing between infections with these closely related viruses possible, requires only one drop of blood. This allows us to test for multiple viruses simultaneously with the same amount of blood previously used to test for only one virus, while distinguishing between genetically closely related viruses.