Stacey George

Dr. Stacey George

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2017 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKate E Laver
Kate E Laver
BLBelinda Lange
Belinda Lange
SGStacey George
Stacey George
JDJudith E Deutsch
Judith E Deutsch
GSGustavo Saposnik
Gustavo Saposnik
MCMaria Crotty
Maria Crotty

31 January 2020 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKate E Laver
Kate E Laver
ZAZoe Adey-Wakeling
Zoe Adey-Wakeling
MCMaria Crotty
Maria Crotty
Natasha A. LanninNatasha A. Lannin
Natasha A. Lannin
SGStacey George
Stacey George
CSCatherine Sherrington
Catherine Sherrington

12 February 2015 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKate E Laver
Kate E Laver
SGStacey George
Stacey George
STSusie Thomas
Susie Thomas
JDJudith E Deutsch
Judith E Deutsch
MCMaria Crotty
Maria Crotty

7 September 2011
Verified
Reference Entry
Closed access
KLKate E Laver
Kate E Laver
SGStacey George
Stacey George
STSusie Thomas
Susie Thomas
JDJudith E Deutsch
Judith E Deutsch
MCMaria Crotty
Maria Crotty

1 February 2012 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKate Laver
Kate Laver
SGStacey George
Stacey George
STSusie Thomas
Susie Thomas
JDJudith E. Deutsch
Judith E. Deutsch
MCMaria Crotty
Maria Crotty

16 December 2011 in Disability and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKate Laver
Kate Laver
SGStacey George
Stacey George
JRJulie Ratcliffe
Julie Ratcliffe
MCMaria Crotty
Maria Crotty
Purpose: To describe a modification of the computer self efficacy scale for use in clinical settings and to report on the modified scale’s reliability and construct validity. Methods: The computer self efficacy scale was modified to make it applicable for clinical settings (for use with older people or people with disabilities using everyday technologies). The modified scale was piloted, then tested with patients in an Australian inpatient rehabilitation setting (n = 88) to determine the internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Construct validity was assessed by correlation of the scale with age and technology use. Factor analysis using principal components analysis was undertaken to identify important constructs within the scale. Results: The modified computer self efficacy scale demonstrated high internal consistency with a standardised alpha coefficient of 0.94. Two constructs within the scale were apparent; using the technology alone, and using the technology with the support of others. Scores on the scale were correlated with age and frequency of use of some technologies thereby supporting construct validity. Conclusions: The modified computer self efficacy scale has demonstrated reliability and construct validity for measuring the self efficacy of older people or people with disabilities when using everyday technologies. This tool has the potential to assist clinicians in identifying older patients who may be more open to using new technologies to maintain independence.