Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNENs) are heterogeneous in clinical course, biology, and outcomes. The NETPET score predicts survival by scoring uptake on dual [⁶⁸Ga]DOTATATE and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT scans. We aimed to validate previous single-centre findings in a multicentre, international study. Methods: Dual scans were assigned a NETPET score of P1 (DOTATATE positive/FDG negative), P2–4 (DOTATATE positive/FDG positive), or P5 (DOTATATE negative/FDG positive). NETPET score, histological grade, age at diagnosis, and presence/absence of extrahepatic disease were compared to overall survival/time to progression on univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: 319 metastatic/unresectable GEPNEN patients were included. The NETPET score was significantly associated with overall survival and time to progression on univariate and multivariate analysis (all p < 0.01). Median overall survival/time to progression was 101.8/25.5 months for P1, 46.5/16.7 months for P2–4, and 11.5/6.6 months for P5. Histological grade correlated with overall survival and time to progression on univariate and multivariate analysis (all p < 0.01), while presence/absence of extrahepatic disease did not. Age at diagnosis correlated with overall survival on univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.01). The NETPET score also correlated with histological grade (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study validates the NETPET score as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic GEPNENs, capturing the complexity of dual PET imaging.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between absorbed dose and response of colorectal cancer liver metastases treated with [90Y]-resin microspheres and to explore possible clinical and imaging derived prognostic factors. FDG PET/CT was used to measure response of individual lesions to a measured absorbed dose, derived from post-treatment 90Y PET imaging. Predicted dose was also derived from planning [99mTc]-MAA SPECT data. Peak standardised uptake value and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were explored as response measures, and compared to dose metrics including average dose (D avg), biologically effective dose, minimum dose to 70% of lesion volume and volume receiving at least 50 Gy. Prognostic factors examined included baseline TLG, RAS mutation status, FDG heterogeneity and dose heterogeneity. In an exploratory analysis, response and clinico-pathological variables were evaluated and compared to overall survival. Sixty-three lesions were analysed from 22 patients. Poor agreement was seen between predicted and measured dose values. TLG was a superior measure of response, and all dose metrics were significant prognostic factors, with a D avg of ~50 Gy derived as the critical threshold for a significant response (>50% reduction in TLG). No significant correlation was found between baseline TLG or RAS mutation status and response. Measured dose heterogeneity was a significant prognostic factor and when combined with D avg had a positive predictive value for response >80%. In the exploratory analysis for prognostic factors of survival, low hepatic tumour burden and mean reduction in TLG >65% were independently associated with improved overall survival. Lesions receiving an average dose greater than 50 Gy are likely to have a significant response. For lesions receiving less than 50 Gy, dose heterogeneity is a significant prognostic factor. Lesions receiving an average dose less than 20 Gy are unlikely to respond. A reduction in TLG may be associated with improved overall survival.

Pancreatic cancer has poor survival despite modern-day advances in its management. At present, there are no available biomarkers that can predict chemotherapy response or help inform prognosis. In more recent years, there has been increased interest in potential inflammatory biomarkers, with studies revealing a worse prognosis of patients with a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in a range of tumour types. Our aim was to assess the role of three inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood in predicting chemotherapy response in patients with earlier disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and as a prognostic marker in all patients that underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer. Using retrospective records, we discovered that patients with a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>5) at the time of diagnosis had worse median overall survival than those with ratios ≤5 at 13 and 32.4 months (p = 0.001, HR 2.43), respectively. We were able to appreciate a correlation between a higher platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and increased residual tumour in the histopathological specimen in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the association was weak (p = 0.03, coefficient 0.21). Due to the dynamic relationship between the immune system and pancreatic cancer, it is unsurprising that immune markers may be useful as potential biomarkers; however, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

PET scans using ¹⁸F-FDG and somatostatin receptor imaging agents are both used in imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). We have suggested the “NETPET score,” using uptake of both PET tracers, as a prognostic biomarker in NENs. The name NETPET score was suggested previously to capture the score9s intent to summarize information from dual PET imaging in neuroendocrine tumors. We previously demonstrated the effectiveness of the NETPET score in gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEPNENs). Its prognostic relevance in bronchial NENs remains undetermined. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study (2011–2018) assessing patients who had advanced bronchial NEN and who underwent both ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET within 60 d of each other. The NETPET score was assigned by experienced nuclear medicine physicians and compared with other clinical data such as World Health Organization grade. The primary outcome was overall survival; NETPET score and other prognostic variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses by the Cox proportional-hazards model. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included for review. The NETPET score and histology were significantly correlated with overall survival in univariate analyses (P = 0.003, P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, only the NETPET score remained significant (P = 0.03). The NETPET score was significantly associated with histologic grade (P = 0.006, χ² test). Conclusion: The NETPET score is a prognostic biomarker in bronchial NENs as well as GEPNENs. Although it needs to be validated in prospective studies, it holds significant promise as a biomarker for a wide range of NENs. Visual Abstract

Biologic agents have achieved variable results in relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the efficacy of biological therapy. Major databases were searched for randomised studies of mCRC after first-line treatment comparing (1) standard treatment plus biologic agent with standard treatment or (2) standard treatment with biologic agent with the same treatment with different biologic agent(s). Data were extracted on study design, participants, interventions and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the MERGE criteria. Comparable data were pooled for meta-analysis. Twenty eligible studies with 8225 patients were identified. The use of any biologic therapy improved overall survival with hazard ratio (HR) 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.91, P<0.00001), progression-free survival (PFS) with HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74, P<0.0001) and overall response rate (ORR) with odds ratio (OR) 2.38 (95% CI 2.03-2.78, P<0.00001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was increased with OR 2.34. Considering by subgroups, EGFR inhibitors (EGFR-I) in the second-line setting and anti-angiogenic therapies (both in second-line and third-line and beyond settings) all improved overall survival, PFS and ORR. EGFR-I in third-line settings improved PFS and ORR but not OS. The use of biologic agents in mCRC after first-line treatment is associated with improved outcomes but increased toxicity.