Andres Perez

Prof. Andres Perez


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2016 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVenkatramana D. Krishna
Venkatramana D. Krishna
Kai WuKai Wu
Kai Wu
APAndres Perez
Andres Perez
JWJian-Ping Wang
Jian-Ping Wang
We have developed a simple and sensitive method for the detection of influenza A virus (IAV) based on giant magnetoresistance (GMR) biosensor. This assay employs monoclonal antibodies to viral nucleoprotein (NP) in combination with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). Presence of influenza virus allows the binding of MNPs to the GMR sensor and the binding is proportional to the concentration of virus. Binding of MNPs onto the GMR sensor causes change in the resistance of sensor, which is measured in a real time electrical readout. GMR biosensor detected as low as 1.5 × 102 TCID50/mL virus and the signal intensity increased with increasing concentration of virus up to 1.0 × 105 TCID50/mL. This study showed that the GMR biosensor assay is relevant for diagnostic application since the virus concentration in nasal samples of influenza virus infected swine was reported to be in the range of 103 to 105 TCID50/mL.

1 October 2018 in Food Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVenkatramana D. Krishna
Venkatramana D. Krishna
Kai WuKai Wu
Kai Wu
DSDiqing Su
Diqing Su
MCMaxim C-J Cheeran
Maxim C-J Cheeran
JWJian-Ping Wang
Jian-Ping Wang
APAndres Perez
Andres Perez

5 October 2021 in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WGWendy Gonzales
Wendy Gonzales
CMCarlos Moreno
Carlos Moreno
UDUziel Duran
Uziel Duran
NHNatalia Henao
Natalia Henao
MBMiguel Bencosme
Miguel Bencosme
APAndres Perez
Andres Perez

1 January 2016 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kimberly VanderWaalKimberly VanderWaal
Kimberly VanderWaal
Catalina Picasso RissoCatalina Picasso Risso
Catalina Picasso Risso
EEEva Enns
Eva Enns
MCMeggan E Craft
Meggan E Craft
JAJulio Alvarez
Julio Alvarez
SWScott J Wells
Scott J Wells

1 September 2018 in Epidemics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Kimberly VanderWaalKimberly VanderWaal
Kimberly VanderWaal
APAndres Perez
Andres Perez
MTMontse Torremorrell
Montse Torremorrell
RMRobert M. Morrison
Robert M. Morrison
MCMeggan E Craft
Meggan E Craft
Epidemiological models of the spread of pathogens in livestock populations primarily focus on direct contact between farms based on animal movement data, and in some cases, local spatial spread based on proximity between premises. The roles of other types of indirect contact among farms is rarely accounted for. In addition, data on animal movements is seldom available in the United States. However, the spread of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv) in U.S. swine represents one of the best documented emergences of a highly infectious pathogen in the U.S. livestock industry, providing an opportunity to parameterize models of pathogen spread via direct and indirect transmission mechanisms in swine. Using observed data on pig movements during the initial phase of the PEDv epidemic, we developed a network-based and spatially explicit epidemiological model that simulates the spread of PEDv via both indirect and direct movement-related contact in order to answer unresolved questions concerning factors facilitating between-farm transmission. By modifying the likelihood of each transmission mechanism and fitting this model to observed epidemiological dynamics, our results suggest that between-farm transmission was primarily driven by direct mechanisms related to animal movement and indirect mechanisms related to local spatial spread based on geographic proximity. However, other forms of indirect transmission among farms, including contact via contaminated vehicles and feed, were responsible for high consequence transmission events resulting in the introduction of the virus into new geographic areas. This research is among the first reports of farm-level animal movements in the U.S. swine industry and, to our knowledge, represents the first epidemiological model of commercial U.S. swine using actual data on farm-level animal movement.

21 June 2019 in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
APAndres Perez
Andres Perez
DLDaniel C. L. Linhares
Daniel C. L. Linhares
AAAndreia G. Arruda
Andreia G. Arruda
KVKimberly VanderWaal
Kimberly VanderWaal
GMGustavo Machado
Gustavo Machado
CCCesar A. Corzo
Cesar A. Corzo
Livestock producers have traditionally been reluctant to share information related to their business, including data on health status of their animals, which, sometimes, has impaired the ability to implement surveillance programs. However, during the last decade, swine producers in the United States (US) and other countries have voluntarily begun to share data for the control and elimination of specific infectious diseases, such as the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv). Those surveillance programs have played a pivotal role in bringing producers and veterinarians together for the benefit of the industry. Examples of situations in which producers have decided to voluntarily share data for extended periods of time to support applied research and, ultimately, disease control in the absence of a regulatory framework have rarely been documented in the peer-reviewed literature. Here, we provide evidence of a national program for voluntary sharing of disease status data that has helped the implementation of surveillance activities that, ultimately, allowed the generation of critically important scientific information to better support disease control activities. Altogether, this effort has supported, and is supporting, the design and implementation of prevention and control approaches for the most economically devastating swine disease affecting the US. The program, which has been voluntarily sustained and supported over an extended period of time by the swine industry in the absence of any regulatory framework and that includes data on approximately 50% of the sow population in the US, represents a unique example of a livestock industry self-organized surveillance program to generate scientific-driven solutions for emerging swine health issues in North America.