Abby C. King

Dr. Abby C. King

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 December 2016 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSarah Ann Mummah
Sarah Ann Mummah
TRThomas N. Robinson
Thomas N. Robinson
AKAbby C. King
Abby C. King
CGChristopher Gardner
Christopher Gardner
SSStephen Sutton
Stephen Sutton
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

1 January 2012 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJordan A. Carlson
Jordan A. Carlson
JSJames Sallis
James Sallis
TCTerry L. Conway
Terry L. Conway
BSBrian E. Saelens
Brian E. Saelens
LFLawrence D. Frank
Lawrence D. Frank
AKAbby C. King
Abby C. King

1 November 2011 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAbby C. King
Abby C. King
JSJames Sallis
James Sallis
LFLawrence D. Frank
Lawrence D. Frank
BSBrian E. Saelens
Brian E. Saelens
KCKelli Cain
Kelli Cain
JKJacqueline Kerr
Jacqueline Kerr

1 August 2002 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAbby C. King
Abby C. King
DSDaniel Stokols
Daniel Stokols
ETEmily Talen
Emily Talen
GBGlenn S Brassington
Glenn S Brassington
RKRichard Killingsworth
Richard Killingsworth

25 April 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAbby C. King
Abby C. King
EHEric B. Hekler
Eric B. Hekler
LGLauren A. Grieco
Lauren A. Grieco
SWSandra J. Winter
Sandra J. Winter
JSJylana L. Sheats
Jylana L. Sheats
JCJesse Cirimele
Jesse Cirimele
Mobile devices are a promising channel for delivering just-in-time guidance and support for improving key daily health behaviors. Despite an explosion of mobile phone applications aimed at physical activity and other health behaviors, few have been based on theoretically derived constructs and empirical evidence. Eighty adults ages 45 years and older who were insufficiently physically active, engaged in prolonged daily sitting, and were new to smartphone technology, participated in iterative design development and feasibility testing of three daily activity smartphone applications based on motivational frames drawn from behavioral science theory and evidence. An “analytically” framed custom application focused on personalized goal setting, self-monitoring, and active problem solving around barriers to behavior change. A “socially” framed custom application focused on social comparisons, norms, and support. An “affectively” framed custom application focused on operant conditioning principles of reinforcement scheduling and emotional transference to an avatar, whose movements and behaviors reflected the physical activity and sedentary levels of the user. To explore the applications' initial efficacy in changing regular physical activity and leisure-time sitting, behavioral changes were assessed across eight weeks in 68 participants using the CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire and the Australian sedentary behavior questionnaire. User acceptability of and satisfaction with the applications was explored via a post-intervention user survey. The results indicated that the three applications were sufficiently robust to significantly improve regular moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and decrease leisure-time sitting during the 8-week behavioral adoption period. Acceptability of the applications was confirmed in the post-intervention surveys for this sample of midlife and older adults new to smartphone technology. Preliminary data exploring sustained use of the applications across a longer time period yielded promising results. The results support further systematic investigation of the efficacy of the applications for changing these key health-promoting behaviors.

14 May 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRoy P. Remme
Roy P. Remme
HFHoward Frumkin
Howard Frumkin
AGAnne D. Guerry
Anne D. Guerry
AKAbby C. King
Abby C. King
LMLisa Mandle
Lisa Mandle
GDGretchen C. Daily
Gretchen C. Daily
Nature underpins human well-being in critical ways, especially in health. Nature provides pollination of nutritious crops, purification of drinking water, protection from floods, and climate security, among other well-studied health benefits. A crucial, yet challenging, research frontier is clarifying how nature promotes physical activity for its many mental and physical health benefits, particularly in densely populated cities with scarce and dwindling access to nature. Here we frame this frontier by conceptually developing a spatial decision-support tool that shows where, how, and for whom urban nature promotes physical activity, to inform urban greening efforts and broader health assessments. We synthesize what is known, present a model framework, and detail the model steps and data needs that can yield generalizable spatial models and an effective tool for assessing the urban nature–physical activity relationship. Current knowledge supports an initial model that can distinguish broad trends and enrich urban planning, spatial policy, and public health decisions. New, iterative research and application will reveal the importance of different types of urban nature, the different subpopulations who will benefit from it, and nature’s potential contribution to creating more equitable, green, livable cities with active inhabitants.