soukayna belekbir

Dr. soukayna belekbir


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 May 2020 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBsoukayna belekbir
soukayna belekbir
MAMohammed EL Azzouzi
Mohammed EL Azzouzi
AHAdnane El Hamidi
Adnane El Hamidi
LRLaura Rodriguez-Lorenzo
Laura Rodriguez-Lorenzo
Arturo SantaballaArturo Santaballa
Arturo Santaballa
Moisés CanleMoisés Canle
Moisés Canle
Photocatalyzed degradation of phenol in aqueous solution over surface impregnated TiO2 (M = Cu, Cr, V) under UV-Vis (366 nm) and UV (254 nm) irradiation is described. Nanosized photocatalyts were prepared from TiO2-P25 by wet impregnation, and characterized by X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, transmission electron microscopy, UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and adsorption studies. No oxide phases of the metal dopants were found, although their presence in the TiO2-P25 lattice induces tensile strain in Cu-impregnated TiO2-P25, whereas compressive strain in Cr- and V-impregnated TiO2-P25. Experimental evidences support chemical and mechanical stability of the photocatalysts. Type IV N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms, with a small H3 loop near the maximum relative pressure were observed. Metal surface impregnated photocatalysts are mesoporous with a similar surface roughness, and a narrow pore distribution around ca. 25 Å. They were chemically stable, showing no metal lixiviation. Their photocatalytic activity was followed by UV-Vis spectroscopy and HPLC–UV. A first order kinetic model appropriately fitted the experimental data. The fastest phenol degradation was obtained with M (0.1%)/TiO2-P25, the reactivity order being Cu > V >> Cr > TiO2-P25 under 366 nm irradiation, while TiO2-P25 > Cu > V > Cr, when using 254 nm radiation. TOC removal under 366 nm irradiation for 300 min showed almost quantitative mineralization for all tested materials, while 254 nm irradiation for 60 min led to maximal TOC removal (ca. 30%). Photoproducts and intermediate photoproducts were identified by HPLC–MS, and appropriate reaction pathways are proposed. The energy efficiency of the process was analysed, showing UV lamps are superior to UVA lamps, and that the efficiency of the surface impregnated catalyst varies in the order Cu > V > Cr.

1 June 2023 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBsoukayna belekbir
soukayna belekbir
MAMohammed EL Azzouzi
Mohammed EL Azzouzi
LRLaura Rodriguez-Lorenzo
Laura Rodriguez-Lorenzo
AHAdnane El Hamidi
Adnane El Hamidi
Arturo SantaballaArturo Santaballa
Arturo Santaballa
Moisés CanleMoisés Canle
Moisés Canle
One of the main challenges of photocatalysis is to find a stable and effective photocatalyst, that is active and effective under sunlight. Here, we discuss the photocatalytic degradation of phenol as a model pollutant in aqueous solution using NUV-Vis (>366 nm) and UV (254 nm) in the presence of TiO2-P25 impregnated with different concentrations of Co (0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5%, and 1%). The modification of the surface of the photocatalyst was performed by wet impregnation, and the obtained solids were characterized using X-ray diffraction, XPS, SEM, EDS, TEM, N2 physisorption, Raman and UV-Vis DRS, which revealed the structural and morphological stability of the modified material. BET isotherms are type IV, with slit-shaped pores formed by nonrigid aggregate particles and no pore networks and a small H3 loop near the maximum relative pressure. The doped samples show increased crystallite sizes and a lower band gap, extending visible light harvesting. All prepared catalysts showed band gaps in the interval 2.3–2.5 eV. The photocatalytic degradation of aqueous phenol over TiO2-P25 and Co(X%)/TiO2 was monitored using UV-Vis spectrophotometry: Co(0.1%)/TiO2 being the most effective with NUV-Vis irradiation. TOC analysis showed ca. 96% TOC removal with NUV-Vis radiation, while only 23% removal under UV radiation.

3 June 2020 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBsoukayna belekbir
soukayna belekbir
MAMohammed EL Azzouzi
Mohammed EL Azzouzi
AHAdnane El Hamidi
Adnane El Hamidi
LRLaura Rodriguez-Lorenzo
Laura Rodriguez-Lorenzo
Arturo SantaballaArturo Santaballa
Arturo Santaballa
Moisés CanleMoisés Canle
Moisés Canle
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper: