Bin Su

Dr. Bin Su


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYunlong Cao
Yunlong Cao
BSBin Su
Bin Su
XGXianghua Guo
Xianghua Guo
WSWenjie Sun
Wenjie Sun
YDYongqiang Deng
Yongqiang Deng
XXX. Sunney Xie
X. Sunney Xie

1 April 2021 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XRXianwen Ren
Xianwen Ren
WWWen Wen
Wen Wen
XFXiaoying Fan
Xiaoying Fan
WHWenhong Hou
Wenhong Hou
BSBin Su
Bin Su
ZZZemin Zhang
Zemin Zhang

26 September 2019 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LXLei Xu
Lei Xu
JWJun Wang
Jun Wang
YLYulin Liu
Yulin Liu
LXLiangfu Xie
Liangfu Xie
BSBin Su
Bin Su
HCHu Chen
Hu Chen
The safety of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)–based genome editing in the context of human gene therapy is largely unknown. CCR5 is a reasonable but not absolutely protective target for a cure of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, because CCR5-null blood cells are largely resistant to HIV-1 entry. We transplanted CRISPR-edited CCR5-ablated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) into a patient with HIV-1 infection and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The acute lymphoblastic leukemia was in complete remission with full donor chimerism, and donor cells carrying the ablated CCR5 persisted for more than 19 months without gene editing–related adverse events. The percentage of CD4+ cells with CCR5 ablation increased by a small degree during a period of antiretroviral-therapy interruption. Although we achieved successful transplantation and long-term engraftment of CRISPR-edited HSPCs, the percentage of CCR5 disruption in lymphocytes was only approximately 5%, which indicates the need for further research into this approach. (Funded by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03164135.)

28 April 2020 in Cellular & Molecular Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WWWenjing Wang
Wenjing Wang
BSBin Su
Bin Su
LPLijun Pang
Lijun Pang
LQLuxin Qiao
Luxin Qiao
YFYingmei Feng
Yingmei Feng
DCDexi Chen
Dexi Chen

30 December 2009 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBin Su
Bin Su
SWSébastien Wurtzer
Sébastien Wurtzer
MRMarie-Anne Rameix-Welti
Marie-Anne Rameix-Welti
DDDominic Dwyer
Dominic Dwyer
SWSylvie Van Der Werf
Sylvie Van Der Werf
BLBéatrice Labrosse
Béatrice Labrosse
The major role of the neuraminidase (NA) protein of influenza A virus is related to its sialidase activity, which disrupts the interaction between the envelope hemagglutin (HA) protein and the sialic acid receptors expressed at the surface of infected cells. This enzymatic activity is known to promote the release and spread of progeny viral particles following their production by infected cells, but a potential role of NA in earlier steps of the viral life cycle has never been clearly demonstrated. In this study we have examined the impact of NA expression on influenza HA-mediated viral membrane fusion and virion infectivity. The role of NA in the early stages of influenza virus replication was examined using a cell-cell fusion assay that mimics HA-mediated membrane fusion, and a virion infectivity assay using HIV-based pseudoparticles expressing influenza HA and/or NA proteins. In the cell-cell fusion assay, which bypasses the endocytocytosis step that is characteristic of influenza virus entry, we found that in proper HA maturation conditions, NA clearly enhanced fusion in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, expression of NA at the surface of pseudoparticles significantly enhanced virion infectivity. Further experiments using exogeneous soluble NA revealed that the most likely mechanism for enhancement of fusion and infectivity by NA was related to desialylation of virion-expressed HA. The NA protein of influenza A virus is not only required for virion release and spread but also plays a critical role in virion infectivity and HA-mediated membrane fusion.

18 December 2019 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBin Su
Bin Su
SDStefania Dispinseri
Stefania Dispinseri
VIValeria Iannone
Valeria Iannone
TZTong Zhang
Tong Zhang
HWHao Wu
Hao Wu
CMChristiane Moog
Christiane Moog
Antibodies (Abs) are the major component of the humoral immune response and a key player in vaccination. The precise Ab-mediated inhibitory mechanisms leading to in vivo protection against HIV have not been elucidated. In addition to the desired viral capture and neutralizing Ab functions, complex Ab-dependent mechanisms that involve engaging immune effector cells to clear infected host cells, immune complexes, and opsonized virus have been proposed as being relevant. These inhibitory mechanisms involve Fc-mediated effector functions leading to Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, cell-mediated virus inhibition, aggregation, and complement inhibition. Indeed, the decreased risk of infection observed in the RV144 HIV-1 vaccine trial was correlated with the production of non-neutralizing inhibitory Abs, highlighting the role of Ab inhibitory functions besides neutralization. Moreover, Ab isotypes and subclasses recognizing specific HIV envelope epitopes as well as pecular Fc-receptor polymorphisms have been associated with disease progression. These findings further support the need to define which Fc-mediated Ab inhibitory functions leading to protection are critical for HIV vaccine design. Herein, based on our previous review Su & Moog Front Immunol 2014, we update the different inhibitory properties of HIV-specific Abs that may potentially contribute to HIV protection.