Jian-an Huang

Jian-an Huang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 April 2010 in Medical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMChuan-Yong Mu
Chuan-Yong Mu
JHJian-an Huang
Jian-an Huang
YCYing Chen
Ying Chen
CCCheng Chen
Cheng Chen
XZXue-Guang Zhang
Xue-Guang Zhang

26 July 2017 in International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XZXiaohui Zhang
Xiaohui Zhang
YZYuanyuan Zeng
Yuanyuan Zeng
QQQiuxia Qu
Qiuxia Qu
JZJianjie Zhu
Jianjie Zhu
ZLZeyi Liu
Zeyi Liu
JHJian-an Huang
Jian-an Huang

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWenwen Du
Wenwen Du
MYMin Yang
Min Yang
ATAbbey Turner
Abbey Turner
CXChunling Xu
Chunling Xu
RFRobert L. Ferris
Robert L. Ferris
BLBing Lu
Bing Lu
Cancer immunotherapy has produced impressive clinical results in recent years. Despite the success of the checkpoint blockade strategies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), a large portion of cancer patients have not yet benefited from this novel therapy. T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3) has been shown to mediate immune tolerance in mouse models of infectious diseases, alloimmunity, autoimmunity, and tumor Immunity. Thus, targeting TIM-3 emerges as a promising approach for further improvement of current immunotherapy. Despite a large amount of experimental data showing an immune suppressive function of TIM-3 in vivo, the exact mechanisms are not well understood. To enable effective targeting of TIM-3 for tumor immunotherapy, further in-depth mechanistic studies are warranted. These studies will also provide much-needed insight for the rational design of novel combination therapy with other checkpoint blockers. In this review, we summarize key evidence supporting an immune regulatory role of TIM-3 and discuss possible mechanisms of action.

1 November 2012 in Tumori Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYan-Bin Chen
Yan-Bin Chen
CMChuan-Yong Mu
Chuan-Yong Mu
JHJian-an Huang
Jian-an Huang
Aims and background: The programmed death-1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been recently suggested to play a pivotal role in the immune evasion of tumors from host immune system. In the study, we tried to reveal the clinical significance of PD-L1 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is one of the most aggressive and intractable malignant tumors. Methods and study design: PD-L1 expression in 120 NSCLC tissue specimens and 10 benign control samples embedded with wax were retrospectively detected by immunohistochemistry. Results: No PD-L1 was detected in the 10 benign controls, whereas 57.5% of NSCLC tissue specimens showed PD-L1 expression. There was no relationship between PD-L1 expression and patient age, gender or histopathological type. However, PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated to the degree of tumor cell differentiation, stage of tumor node metastasis (TNM) and patient survival. Poor tumor cell differentiation and advanced TNM stage were related to higher PD-L1 expression. PD-L1-negative NSCLC patients had longer overall 5-year survival than PD-L1-positive patients (P <0.0001). PD-L1 status was a significant independent prognostic factor of NSCLC (χ2 = 18.153, RR = 2.946, P <0.001). Conclusions: Up-regulated PD-L1 expression in NSCLC is related to the degree of tumor cell differentiation and TNM stage. PD-L1 status may be a new predictor of prognosis for patients with NSCLC.

2 November 2020 in Cell Death & Differentiation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWenwen Du
Wenwen Du
JZJianjie Zhu
Jianjie Zhu
YZYuanyuan Zeng
Yuanyuan Zeng
TLTing Liu
Ting Liu
YZYang Zhang
Yang Zhang
JHJian-an Huang
Jian-an Huang
In addition to the role of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in facilitating tumour cells escape from immune surveillance, it is considered as a crucial effector in transducing intrinsic signals to promote tumour development. Our previous study has pointed out that PD-L1 promotes non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell proliferation, but the mechanism remains elusive. Here we first demonstrated that PD-L1 expression levels were positively correlated with p-MerTK levels in patient samples and NSCLC cell lines. In addition, PD-L1 knockdown led to the reduced phosphorylation level of MerTK in vitro. We next showed that PD-L1 regulated NSCLC cell proliferation via Gas6/MerTK signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. To investigate the underlying mechanism, we unexpectedly found that PD-L1 translocated into the nucleus of cancer cells which was facilitated through the binding of Karyopherin β1 (KPNB1). Nuclear PD-L1 (nPD-L1), coupled with transcription factor Sp1, regulated the synthesis of Gas6 mRNA and promoted Gas6 secretion to activate MerTK signaling pathway. Taken together, our results shed light on the novel role of nPD-L1 in NSCLC cell proliferation and reveal a new molecular mechanism underlying nPD-L1-mediated Gas6/MerTK signaling activation. All above findings provide the possible combinational implications for PD-L1 targeted immunotherapy in the clinic.

1 November 2012
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYan-Bin Chen
Yan-Bin Chen
CMChuan-Yong Mu
Chuan-Yong Mu
JHJian-an Huang
Jian-an Huang