The existing knowledge on the bull seminal vesicle proteome, a major seminal plasma constituent, and its relationship with seminal plasma is limited. This knowledge is prerequisite for a better understanding of seminal plasma variability, which is linked to semen quality. The objective of this study was to characterize the proteomes of seminal vesicle fluid and seminal plasma and to compare them to better understand the origin of seminal plasma proteins. We collected ejaculates and seminal vesicle fluid postmortem from 6 mature Holstein Friesian bulls. We performed the analysis and identification of proteins using 2-dimensional electrophoresis coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. We identified 105 proteins in bull seminal vesicle fluid and 88 proteins in seminal plasma. For both seminal vesicles and seminal plasma proteins described in our study, top biological functions were cellular movement, cell death and survival, and cellular growth and proliferation. Additionally, seminal vesicle fluid proteins were involved in protein degradation and synthesis. Seminal plasma proteins were also involved in cellular assembly and organization and cell-to-cell signaling and interactions. Proteins of both fluids were involved in the following canonical pathways: glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, liver X receptor/farnesoid X receptor, and farnesoid X receptor/retinoid X receptor activation. Additionally, seminal vesicle fluid proteins appeared to be involved in oxidative stress response mediated by nuclear factor E2-related factor 2. Our results described the bull seminal vesicle fluid proteome for the first time and allowed for significant expansion of the current knowledge on the bull seminal plasma proteome. Moreover, analysis indicated that both bull seminal vesicle fluid and seminal plasma proteomes contained interconnected protein groups related to protective functions, glycolysis, and the morphology and physiology of the spermatozoa. These proteins and their interactions could be targeted in future research.

There is some controversy about the extent of changes in different sperm cell features in stored boar semen, especially regarding the potential role of the DNA fragmentation assay for assessment of sperm fertilizing ability. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of time of storage and the dynamic changes in sperm cell characteristics in normospermic boar semen stored in long-term extender, in order to determine the susceptibility to damage of particular structures of spermatozoa during cooling and storage at 17 °C for 240 h post collection. The study included five ejaculates from each of seven boars of the Polish Large White breed (n = 35 ejaculates). The sperm characteristics were assessed using a flow cytometer and a computer assisted sperm analyzer on samples at 0, 48, 96, 168 and 240 h post collection. The sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) showed a significant abrupt increase (P < 0.01) in the DNA fragmentation index (%DFI) after 48 h of semen storage with only subtle changes thereafter, not exceeding 5% on average after 240 h of storage. The use of a combination of SYBR-14/PI stains did not reveal any significant changes in the percentage of live sperm cells up to 168 h of semen storage. A significant (P < 0.01) decrease in the percentage of live spermatozoa with intact acrosomes was observed after prolonged semen storage (168 h). A significant and progressive decrease in sperm motility was recorded during the whole period of semen storage. Storage of boar semen extended in long-term diluent at 17 °C for 48 h initially induced a decrease in the integrity of sperm DNA. This suggests that the structure of boar sperm DNA is susceptible to damage, especially during semen extension and at the beginning of sperm storage. These findings support the opinion that the SCSA test has only a low potential for routine assessment of boar semen preserved in the liquid state and for assessment of sperm quality changes during 10 days of semen preservation. Remarkably, the integrity of acrosomes and plasma membranes remained nearly unchanged for 7 days.

The objective of the study was a comparison of two protocols of goat semen cryopreservation with the use of computer-assisted semen analysis system. Twenty ejaculates obtained with electroejaculation method were assessed. Each ejaculate was divided in half and frozen according to two protocols. In protocol I semen was centrifuged in order to remove its plasma and diluted in Tris buffer extender containing glucose, citric acid and glycerol with 20% addition of egg yolk. Protocol II did not include removal of plasma and the extender contained 1.5% egg yolk. It was shown that the removal of semen plasma improved motility of goat spermatozoa following freezing/thawing with respect to the following motility indicators: motility, average path velocity, amplitude of lateral head displacement at p < 0.05, and straight velocity, straightness and linearity at p < 0.01. In conclusion, the removal of semen plasma through centrifugation improved motility properties of goat semen following the freezing/thawing procedure.

Despite recent advances in bull epididymal fluid proteome research, significant numbers of proteins secreted to epididymal lumen remain unidentified. The objective of this study was to expand the number of identified cauda epididymal fluid proteins in bulls and to contextualize them in a broader view of their mutual interactions and involvement in biological processes and pathways, to fully elucidate the ways in which epididymal fluid proteins are involved in storage and maturation of spermatozoa in epididymis. We collected postmortem cauda epididymal fluid from 6 mature Holstein Friesian bulls. We performed the identification of proteins using 2-dimensional electrophoresis coupled with MALDI mass spectrometry. Analysis of functionality and pathway involvement of identified proteins was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. We identified a total of 189 epididymal fluid proteins, out of which 100 were newly identified in bull epididymal fluid. We have combined our data with 2 previously performed bull epididymal fluid proteome identifications, yielding 280 proteins total, and analyzed it. The main canonical pathways involving epididymal proteins were glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, protein ubiquitination pathway, nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2-mediated oxidative stress response, and farnesoid X receptor/retinoid X receptor activation. The main biological functions potentially performed by epididymal fluid proteins included carbohydrate metabolism, cellular growth and proliferation, cell death and survival, and small molecule biochemistry. Overall, our results have pointed out multiple novel pathways in bull epididymal fluid that might take part in various aspects of maturation and protection processes of epididymal spermatozoa.