This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with avelumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). In this phase II trial, 21 patients with relapsed or refractory ENKTL were treated with 10 mg/kg of avelumab on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439501). The primary end point was the complete response (CR) rate based on the best response. Targeted sequencing and immunohistochemistry were performed using pretreatment tumor tissue, and blood samples were drawn pre- and post-treatment for measurement of cytokines and soluble programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), PD-L1, and PD-L2. The CR rate was 24% (5/21) and the overall response rate was 38% (8/21). Although nonresponders showed early progression, five responders currently continue to receive treatment and have maintained their response. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2; no grade 4 adverse events were observed. Treatment responses did not correlate with mutation profiles, tumor mutation burden, serum levels of cytokines, or soluble PD1/PD-L1 and PD-L2. However, the response to avelumab was significantly associated with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor tissue (P = 0.001). Therefore, all patients achieving CR showed high PD-L1 expression, and their tumor subtyping based on PD-L1 expression correlated with treatment response. In conclusion, avelumab showed single-agent activity in a subset of patients with relapsed or refractory ENKTL. The assessment of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells might be helpful for identifying responders to avelumab.

Primary intestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a heterogeneous disease with regard to anatomic and histologic distribution. Thus, analyses focusing on primary intestinal NHL with large number of patients are warranted. We retrospectively analyzed 581 patients from 16 hospitals in Korea for primary intestinal NHL in this retrospective analysis. We compared clinical features and treatment outcomes according to the anatomic site of involvement and histologic subtypes. B-cell lymphoma (n = 504, 86.7%) was more frequent than T-cell lymphoma (n = 77, 13.3%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common subtype (n = 386, 66.4%), and extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) was the second most common subtype (n = 61, 10.5%). B-cell lymphoma mainly presented as localized disease (Lugano stage I/II) while T-cell lymphomas involved multiple intestinal sites. Thus, T-cell lymphoma had more unfavourable characteristics such as advanced stage at diagnosis, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower than B-cell lymphoma (28% versus 71%, P < 0.001). B symptoms were relatively uncommon (20.7%), and bone marrow invasion was a rare event (7.4%). The ileocecal region was the most commonly involved site (39.8%), followed by the small (27.9%) and large intestines (21.5%). Patients underwent surgery showed better OS than patients did not (5-year OS rate 77% versus 57%, P < 0.001). However, this beneficial effect of surgery was only statistically significant in patients with B-cell lymphomas (P < 0.001) not in T-cell lymphomas (P = 0.460). The comparison of survival based on the anatomic site of involvement showed that ileocecal regions had a better 5-year overall survival rate (72%) than other sites in consistent with that ileocecal region had higher proportion of patients with DLBCL who underwent surgery. Age > 60 years, performance status ≥ 2, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, Lugano stage IV, presence of B symptoms, and T-cell phenotype were independent prognostic factors for survival. The survival of patients with ileocecal region involvement was better than that of patients with involvement at other sites, which might be related to histologic distribution, the proportion of tumor stage, and need for surgical resection.

CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have become an important therapeutic option for patients with relapsed and refractory B cell malignancies. However, a significant portion of patients still do not benefit from the therapy owing to various resistance mechanisms, including high expression of multiple inhibitory immune checkpoint receptors. Here, we report a lentiviral two-in-one CAR T approach in which two checkpoint receptors are downregulated simultaneously by a dual short hairpin RNA cassette integrated into a CAR vector. Using this system, we evaluated CD19-targeting CAR T cells in the context of four different checkpoint combinations—PD-1/TIM-3, PD-1/LAG-3, PD-1/CTLA-4, and PD-1/TIGIT—and found that CAR T cells with PD-1/TIGIT downregulation uniquely exerted synergistic antitumor effects. Importantly, functional and phenotypic analyses suggested that downregulation of PD-1 enhances short-term effector function, whereas downregulation of TIGIT is primarily responsible for maintaining a less differentiated/exhausted state, providing a potential mechanism for the observed synergy. The PD-1/TIGIT-downregulated CAR T cells generated from diffuse large B cell lymphoma patient-derived T cells also showed robust antitumor activity and significantly improved persistence in vivo. The efficacy and safety of PD-1/TIGIT-downregulated CD19-targeting CAR T cells are currently being evaluated in adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04836507).

The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the adrenal gland. Thirty one patients diagnosed with primary adrenal DLBCL from 14 Korean institutions and treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) were analyzed. Complete remission (CR) and overall response rate after R-CHOP chemotherapy were 54.8% and 87.0%. The 2-year estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 68.3% and 51.1%. In patients achieving CR, significant prolongations of OS (P = 0.029) and PFS (P = 0.005) were observed. Ann Arbor stage had no influence on OS. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with unilateral involvement of adrenal gland and those with bilateral involvement. When staging was modified to include bilateral adrenal involvement as one extranodal site, early stage (I or II) significantly correlated with longer OS (P = 0.021) and PFS (P < 0.001). Contrary to prior reports, our data suggests that outcomes of primary adrenal DLBCL are encouraging using a regimen of R-CHOP, and that achieving CR after R-CHOP is predictive of survival. Likewise, our modified staging system may have prognostic value.

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases until July 2023 for trials assessing CAR T-cell therapies and CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies as third or subsequent lines in R/R DLBCL. Random-effects models estimated the complete response (CR) rate and secondary outcomes, with meta-regressions adjusting for relevant covariates. Sixteen studies comprising 1347 patients were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled CR rate for bispecific antibodies was 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.43), compared with 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.56) for CAR T-cell therapy (P < .01). This superiority persisted when comparing the CAR T-cell–naive patients within the bispecific antibody group, with a CR rate of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.32-0.43). Multivariable meta-regression also revealed better efficacy of CAR T cells with adjustment for the proportion of double-hit lymphoma. The pooled 1-year progression-free survival rate mirrored these findings (0.32 [95% CI, 0.26-0.38] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.48]; P < .01). For adverse events of grade ≥3, the bispecific antibody had incidences of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) for cytokine release syndrome, 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.01) for neurotoxicity, and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.03-0.16) for infections. The CAR T cell had rates of 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03-0.12), 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.17), and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.11-0.22), respectively, with significant differences observed in the first 2 categories. In summary, CAR T-cell therapy outperformed bispecific antibody in achieving higher CR rates, although with an increase in severe adverse events.

Ryu KJ, et al. Ann Lab Med. 2020 May;40(3):253-258. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.3.253