Gunnar Kirchhof

Dr. Gunnar Kirchhof

School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2008 in Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cara BealCara Beal
Cara Beal
DRDavid Rassam
David Rassam
EGE. A. Gardner
E. A. Gardner
Gunnar KirchhofGunnar Kirchhof
Gunnar Kirchhof
NMNeal WIlliam Menzies
Neal WIlliam Menzies
The goal of this study was to investigate how extreme hydraulic loading influences hydraulic pathways, and thus failure potential, of two soil absorption systems. A grid of tensiometers and piezometers were installed beneath and adjacent to the absorption trenches, and water height was manipulated to simulate different hydraulic loadings. At both sites, measured soil matric potentials along the trench sidewalls increased toward zero as water height increased over time, indicating that water was preferentially flowing laterally above the biomat zones. Saturated hydraulic conductivity ( Ks ) of the soil and biomat, and other hydraulic parameters were calibrated using inverse modeling procedures in HYDRUS-2D. We found generally good agreement between measured and predicted matric potentials. The calibrated model was then used to predict fluxes through different infiltrative zones under typical and extreme hydraulic loads. Modeling indicated that the overall infiltration rates through the biomat and subbiomat...


27 August 2010 in International Journal of Food Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYun Liu
Yun Liu
HSHouda Sabboh
Houda Sabboh
Gunnar KirchhofGunnar Kirchhof
Gunnar Kirchhof
PSPeter Sopade
Peter Sopade

1 February 2022 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSteffen A. Schweizer
Steffen A. Schweizer
MGMarkus Graf‐Rosenfellner
Markus Graf‐Rosenfellner
NBNisar A. Bhat
Nisar A. Bhat
GKGilles Kayser
Gilles Kayser
BSBhupendra S. Sisodia
Bhupendra S. Sisodia
GBGurbir S. Bhullar
Gurbir S. Bhullar
Organic matter management can improve soil structural properties. This is crucial for agricultural soils in tropical regions threatened by high rainfall intensities. Compared to conventional farming, organic farming is usually deemed to increase organic carbon and improve soil structural properties such as stability and permeability. However, how much, if any, buildup of organic carbon is possible or indeed occurring also depends on soil type and environmental factors. We compared the impact of seven years of organic farming (annually 13.6 t ha−1 of composted manure) with that of conventional practices (2 t ha−1 of farmyard manure with 150–170 kg N ha−1 of mineral fertilizers) on soil structural properties. The study was conducted on a Vertisol in India with a two‐year crop rotation of cotton soybean wheat. Despite large differences in organic amendment application, organic carbon was not significantly different at 9.6 mg C g−1 on average in the topsoil. However, the size distribution of water‐stable aggregates shifted toward more aggregates <137 μm in the organic systems. Cumulative water intake was lower compared to the conventional systems, leading to higher runoff and erosion. These changes might be related to the lower pH and higher exchangeable sodium in the organic systems. Our results indicate that higher application of organic amendments did not lead to higher soil organic carbon and associated improvement in soil structures properties compared to integrated fertilization in this study. Chemical properties may dominate soil aggregation retarding the uptake and integration of organic amendments for sustainable agricultural intensification in tropical, semiarid climates.


1 June 1995 in Soil Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NJNs Jayawardane
Ns Jayawardane
HBHd Barrs
Hd Barrs
WMWa Muirhead
Wa Muirhead
JBJ Blackwell
J Blackwell
EME Murray
E Murray
Gunnar KirchhofGunnar Kirchhof
Gunnar Kirchhof
Subsoil acidity causes low crop production, which is often associated with shallow root development and restricted soil water extraction. In part I of this series, lime-slotting of an acid soil was shown to improve the soil physical and chemical characteristics for root growth. In a lysimeter study on an acid soil, the effects of several soil ameliorative treatments on root growth, water extraction and yields of a medic crop were evaluated. Large lysimeter cores of 0.75 m diameter and 1.35 m deep were used. The soil treatments included a non-ameliorated acid soil, lime-slotting with a 0.15 m wide and 0.8 m deep slot containing 20 t ha-1 of lime, lime-slotting combined with surface phospho-gypsum application at 10 t ha-1, and complete amelioration of the entire soil volume by mixing lime at 133 t ha-1 and repacking to a low bulk density of 1.1 t m-3. In the non-ameliorated acid soil, medic roots were confined to the surface (0.1 m) layer, resulting in limited water extraction of 32 mm during a prolonged drying cycle, and a low dry matter yield of 70 g m-2. In the lime slotted soil, roots grew within the slot to its full depth, although penetration into the undisturbed soil was restricted to the soil immediately adjacent to the slot. Consequently, the root length per unit surface area (La) at depths below 0.1 m depth was increased to 9.9 km m-2. During a drying cycle, water extraction increased to 58 mm. The increased water extraction came from both the slotted soil and the undisturbed soil between slots. This led to an increase in dry matter yields to 270 g m2. In lime-slotted soils with surface gypsum applications, the root growth and crop water extraction patterns were similar to the lime-slotted soil. Repacking limed soil resulted in similar root lengths (L(a) 10.0 km m-2) as lime-slotted soil. However, owing to more uniform distribution of roots in the repacked soil, water extraction was increased to 100 mm and yields increased to 590 g m-2. Yields of non-ameliorated soil were only 12% of the repacked, limed soil. However, lime-slotting which involves loosening only 25% of the soil surface area and addition of only one-sixth of the amount of lime required for complete soil amelioration, led to marked increases in yield (46% of the yield of repacked soil). Future field studies are required to evaluate the optimum limed-slot configurations required for different soils, crops and climatic regimes.