Antonio M. Alberti

Antonio M. Alberti


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDiego G.S. Pivoto
Diego G.S. Pivoto
LALuiz F.F. de Almeida
Luiz F.F. de Almeida
Rodrigo RighiRodrigo Righi
Rodrigo Righi
Joel RodriguesJoel Rodrigues
Joel Rodrigues
ALAlexandre Baratella Lugli
Alexandre Baratella Lugli
AAAntonio M. Alberti
Antonio M. Alberti

29 September 2022 in Journal of Industrial Information Integration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jonas Lopes Vilas BoasJonas Lopes Vilas Boas
Jonas Lopes Vilas Boas
Joel RodriguesJoel Rodrigues
Joel Rodrigues
AAAntonio M. Alberti
Antonio M. Alberti

1 January 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
Dhananjay SinghDhananjay Singh
Dhananjay Singh
GTGaurav Tripathi
Gaurav Tripathi
AAAntonio M. Alberti
Antonio M. Alberti
AJAntonio Jara
Antonio Jara
In this paper, we are visualizing a military health service (MHS) platform which is based on hierarchical IoT architecture. We propose a semantic Edge based network model which plays a significant role for communicating tactical and non-tactical piece of information over the network. Further, the exchange of information and subsequent data analysis on the MHS makes the system intelligent and smart. In any standard battlefield scenario, there is a command and control center that correlates the events happening in real time. We have made this command and control center as semantic edge component. This center is entrusted with making vital decisions on the tactical arena of the battlefield. The main aim of the proposed architecture is to provide secured zone to monitor soldiers health and their weapons conditions, respectively. We have also introduced the semantic edge computing mechanism to deal with the large amount of health data in terms of processing, storing and sharing information.

31 October 2019 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAntonio M. Alberti
Antonio M. Alberti
MSMateus A. S. Santos
Mateus A. S. Santos
RSRicardo Souza
Ricardo Souza
HSHirley Dayan Lourenco Da Silva
Hirley Dayan Lourenco Da Silva
JCJorge Roberto Carneiro
Jorge Roberto Carneiro
Joel RodriguesJoel Rodrigues
Joel Rodrigues
Internet of things (IoT) is pushing the integration of physical and virtual worlds. Sensor devices provide rich sensory information to context-aware services. Actuators implement in the physical world application needs. The role of software is increasing as more and more resources become virtualized and software-defined. Smart environment is an emerging concept that has the potential to address many of the humanity problems. In this context, what are the promising tools for building the smart environments of the future? This paper provides a review of platforms, middleware, and frameworks that can help in this big challenge, discussing their architectures, service life-cycling, digital twins, cloud-based operation, virtualization, security, privacy, communication model, support for AI and machine learning, among other aspects. The proposed revision innovates by employing previous work on future Internet key enablers as parameters for qualitative comparisons. The idea is to determine the degree of alignment among current initiatives for smart environments and the ones emerging from future Internet research. Among the main conclusions are: (i) heterogeneity come to stay; (ii) many contemporary proposals do not cover important aspects raised in future Internet research; (iii) publish/subscribe model is largely employed; (iv) many proposals are stuck to the limitations of current Internet model (another reason to explore the relationship among current platforms and previous future Internet research for IoT); (v) devices interoperability is a problem solved; (vi) ingredients from future Internet research, such as SDN/NFV, ICN and SCN are systematically being adopted for smart environments design. Many others are to come; (vii) AI, machine learning, and big data support are missing not only in TCP/IP-based approaches, but also in future Internet-based.

3 August 2023 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPDiego Gabriel Soares Pivoto
Diego Gabriel Soares Pivoto
TRTibério Tavares Rezende
Tibério Tavares Rezende
MFMichelle Soares Pereira Facina
Michelle Soares Pereira Facina
RMRodrigo Moreira
Rodrigo Moreira
FSFlávio de Oliveira Silva
Flávio de Oliveira Silva
AAAntonio M. Alberti
Antonio M. Alberti
As society evolves as a whole, new demands arise with increasingly demanding prerequisites, consequently requiring more significant effort to be met. Such demands cover emerging applications, such as remote surgeries in Smart Health use cases, whose latency and reliability network requirements cannot be met by current communication systems; or simply improving current applications with more challenging requirements to be achieved, such as increasing the transmission rate in a mobile network, offering Quality of Service (QoS), and consequently, better user experience. Therefore, enabling technologies must be chosen to design an appropriate 6G architecture to address such demands. However, the explosion of emerging applications focused on different scopes and requirements to be met makes choosing these enabling technologies extremely complex and unpredictable. Thus, this article aims to create a methodology for analyzing the relevance of enabling technologies and use it to design an optimal architecture capable of meeting the 6G demands. For this purpose, two methods named as Average (AVG) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) have been selected, whose objective is to determine the relevance of an enabler for the 6G architecture, taking into account different degrees of influencing variables for this analysis, such as adherence to a certain architectural model; popularity in the research area; degree of innovation; synergy with other enablers; and support for requirements. Each of these methods presents a particular result. In the case of the AVG method, the criteria and variables are evaluated independently, and the arithmetic mean is employed to combine the evaluations into a single measure of suitability. In contrast, the AHP method considers the relative importance of criteria and variables in order to classify an optimal set of enabling technologies capable of fulfilling the key roles to be performed by a 6G architecture, and consequently meeting the main 6G demands. Our evaluation provides a unique perspective on 6G enablers, identifying issues and fostering research for future mobile architectures. The results obtained also provide researchers with the necessary information to stay updated on emerging enabling technologies and their suitability for designing new optimized 6G architectures.

18 September 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LALuiz Felipe Fernandes De Almeida
Luiz Felipe Fernandes De Almeida
JSJose Rodrigo Dos Santos
Jose Rodrigo Dos Santos
LPLuiz Augusto Melo Pereira
Luiz Augusto Melo Pereira
Arismar Sodré JuniorArismar Sodré Junior
Arismar Sodré Junior
Luciano MendesLuciano Mendes
Luciano Mendes
AAAntonio M. Alberti
Antonio M. Alberti
The appeal for more reliable, efficient and resilient power grids has become indispensable with the recent technological development and ever-increasing demand for electrical energy. These goals might be achieved by introducing sensors and actuators in the power grid, with the purpose of enabling a smart control of the power network. All power devices must be connected using a reliable communication network, which should be able to operate even when the power grid fails. Currently, several communication technologies have been applied for supporting this new application scenario. This paper aims for reviewing both academic and market use cases for technologies applied to the mission-critical, control networks and Smart Grid applications, such as teleprotection, self-healing, communication with control centers and field devices, among others. More specifically, the key aspects, potential technologies, main protocols and use cases of operating data networks in energy transmission, power distribution and smart grid environments, including circuit and packet switching technologies, are discussed into details. Furthermore, resilience and the main telecommunications technologies used in power grids, as well, the correlation among them, are exploited in practical point of view. The article provides a broad discussion on the best telecommunication options to build the emerging intelligent energy distribution systems, covering control networks, teleprotection, and smart grid applications.