Mirosław Dors

Prof. Mirosław Dors

Centre for Plasma and Laser Engineering, Institute of Fluid Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, 80-231 Gdansk, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2008 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mariusz JasinskiMariusz Jasinski
Mariusz Jasinski
Mirosław DorsMirosław Dors
Mirosław Dors
JMJerzy Mizeraczyk
Jerzy Mizeraczyk

1 October 2016 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDariusz Czylkowski
Dariusz Czylkowski
BHBartosz Hrycak
Bartosz Hrycak
Mariusz JasinskiMariusz Jasinski
Mariusz Jasinski
Mirosław DorsMirosław Dors
Mirosław Dors
JMJerzy Mizeraczyk
Jerzy Mizeraczyk

1 August 2013 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mariusz JasinskiMariusz Jasinski
Mariusz Jasinski
DCDariusz Czylkowski
Dariusz Czylkowski
BHB. Hrycak
B. Hrycak
Mirosław DorsMirosław Dors
Mirosław Dors
JMJ. Mizeraczyk
J. Mizeraczyk

24 November 2013 in Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mirosław DorsMirosław Dors
Mirosław Dors
HNHelena Nowakowska
Helena Nowakowska
Mariusz JasinskiMariusz Jasinski
Mariusz Jasinski
JMJerzy Mizeraczyk
Jerzy Mizeraczyk
Results of chemical kinetics modeling in methane subjected to the microwave plasma at atmospheric pressure are presented in this paper. The reaction mechanism is based on the methane oxidation model without reactions involving nitrogen and oxygen. For the numerical calculations 0D and 1D models were created. 0D model uses Calorimetric Bomb Reactor whereas 1D model is constructed either as Plug Flow Reactor or as a chain of Plug Flow Reactor and Calorimetric Bomb Reactor. Both models explain experimental results and show the most important reactions responsible for the methane conversion and production of H2, C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6 detected in the experiment. Main conclusion is that the chemical reactions in our experiment proceed by a thermal process and the products can be defined by considering thermodynamic equilibrium. Temperature characterizing the methane pyrolysis is 1,500–2,000 K, but plasma temperature is in the range of 4,000–5,700 K, which means that methane pyrolysis process is occurring outside the plasma region in the swirl gas flowing around the plasma.

1 May 2001 in Journal of Electrostatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJerzy Mizeraczyk
Jerzy Mizeraczyk
MKMarek Kocik
Marek Kocik
JDJarosław Dekowski
Jarosław Dekowski
Mirosław DorsMirosław Dors
Mirosław Dors
JPJanusz Podliński
Janusz Podliński
TKToshiyuki Kawasaki
Toshiyuki Kawasaki

25 April 2016 in Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RMRobert Miotk
Robert Miotk
BHBartosz Hrycak
Bartosz Hrycak
DCDariusz Czylkowski
Dariusz Czylkowski
Mirosław DorsMirosław Dors
Mirosław Dors
MJMariusz Jasinski
Mariusz Jasinski
JMJerzy Mizeraczyk
Jerzy Mizeraczyk
Hydrogen is expected to be one of the most promising energy carriers. Due to the growing interest in hydrogen production technologies, in this paper we present the results of experimental investigations of thermal decomposition and dry reforming of two alcohols (ethanol and isopropanol) in the waveguide-supplied metal-cylinder-based nozzleless microwave (915 MHz) plasma source (MPS). The hydrogen production experiments were preceded by electrodynamics properties investigations of the used MPS and plasma spectroscopic diagnostics. All experimental tests were performed with the working gas (nitrogen or carbon dioxide) flow rate ranging from 1200 to 3900 normal litres per hour and an absorbed microwave power up to 5 kW. The alcohols were introduced into the plasma using an induction heating vaporizer. The ethanol thermal decomposition resulted in hydrogen selectivity up to 100%. The hydrogen production rate was up to 1150 NL(H 2 ) h −1 and the energy yield was 267 NL(H 2 ) kWh −1 of absorbed microwave energy. Due to intense soot production, the thermal decomposition process was not appropriate for isopropanol conversion. Considering the dry reforming process, using isopropanol was more efficient in hydrogen production than ethanol. The rate and energy yield of hydrogen production were up to 1116 NL(H 2 ) h −1 and 223 NL(H 2 ) kWh −1 of microwave energy used, respectively. However, the hydrogen selectivity was no greater than 37%. Selected results given by the experiment were compared with the results of numerical modeling.