Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff

Dr. Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 July 2007 in European Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECElisabeth Cardis
Elisabeth Cardis
LRLesley Richardson
Lesley Richardson
IDIsabelle Deltour
Isabelle Deltour
BABruce Armstrong
Bruce Armstrong
MFMaria Feychting
Maria Feychting
NYNaohito Yamaguchi
Naohito Yamaguchi
The very rapid worldwide increase in mobile phone use in the last decade has generated considerable interest in the possible health effects of exposure to radio frequency (RF) fields. A multinational case–control study, INTERPHONE, was set-up to investigate whether mobile phone use increases the risk of cancer and, more specifically, whether the RF fields emitted by mobile phones are carcinogenic. The study focused on tumours arising in the tissues most exposed to RF fields from mobile phones: glioma, meningioma, acoustic neurinoma and parotid gland tumours. In addition to a detailed history of mobile phone use, information was collected on a number of known and potential risk factors for these tumours. The study was conducted in 13 countries. Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and the UK using a common core protocol. This paper describes the study design and methods and the main characteristics of the study population. INTERPHONE is the largest case–control study to date investigating risks related to mobile phone use and to other potential risk factors for the tumours of interest and includes 2,765 glioma, 2,425 meningioma, 1,121 acoustic neurinoma, 109 malignant parotid gland tumour cases and 7,658 controls. Particular attention was paid to estimating the amount and direction of potential recall and participation biases and their impact on the study results.

1 March 2014 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJulie Werenberg Dreier
Julie Werenberg Dreier
AAAnne-Marie Nybo Andersen
Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
GBGabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fever during pregnancy has been suspected to harm the developing fetus. However, until now, no systematic analysis of the available evidence has been undertaken to assess the impact of maternal fever on health outcomes in the child. The goal of this study was to systematically review evidence from epidemiologic studies on adverse health outcomes of the offspring in relation to exposure to maternal fever during pregnancy.METHODS: Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were performed by using Medical Subject Headings, Boolean operators, and truncation, and references of references were reviewed. Cohort and case-control studies addressing health outcomes of prenatal fever exposure in humans were eligible for inclusion. Studies with no direct reference to fever, studies in selected populations (eg, preterm births), and studies published before 1990 were excluded.RESULTS: The available literature supported an increased risk of adverse offspring health in association with fever during pregnancy. The strongest evidence was available for neural tube defects, congenital heart defects, and oral clefts, in which meta-analyses suggested between a 1.5- and nearly 3-fold increased risk with fever exposure in the first trimester. We did not find strong evidence of a dose–response relationship, but there was some evidence that antipyretic medications may have a protective effect when used in relation to febrile episodes.CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial evidence to support the contention that maternal fever during pregnancy may negatively affect offspring health. The harmful effects seemed to cover both short- and longer-term health outcomes; however, for several outcomes, the evidence was insufficient to judge any association.

3 April 2017 in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff
GNGrace Nielsen
Grace Nielsen
ELEva Ladekjær Larsen
Eva Ladekjær Larsen
The aim of this systematic review is to summarise quantitative studies in occupational settings observing the association between Information communication technology (ICT) and stress, and burnout, considering age as an effect modifier. A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted through the following bibliographic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Psycinfo, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were occupational settings and content relevant to our research question. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two interventional, 4 cohorts, and 29 cross-sectional studies were found. ICT use in occupational settings was associated with stress seen in cross-sectional studies, but not in interventional studies. There was a concordant association with ICT and burnout in different study designs. Overall, there were no linear trends between age and technostress. We suggest that the observed associations were mostly present in the middle-aged working population and that these associations need to be supported in further studies.

1 February 1999 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDietrich Rothenbacher
Dietrich Rothenbacher
GBGuenter Bode
Guenter Bode
GBGabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff
UKUte Knayer
Ute Knayer
TGTheodor Gonser
Theodor Gonser
HBHermann Brenner
Hermann Brenner
This study assessed the role of parental infection status in the transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection in a large population-based sample of

27 January 2006 in American Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJoachim Schüz
Joachim Schüz
EBEva Böhler
Eva Böhler
GBGabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff
BSBrigitte Schlehofer
Brigitte Schlehofer
IHIris Hettinger
Iris Hettinger
MBMaria Blettner
Maria Blettner
The widespread use of cellular telephones has generated concern about possible adverse health effects, particularly brain tumors. In this population-based case-control study carried out in three regions of Germany, all incident cases of glioma and meningioma among patients aged 30–69 years were ascertained during 2000–2003. Controls matched on age, gender, and region were randomly drawn from population registries. In total, 366 glioma cases, 381 meningioma cases, and 1,494 controls were interviewed. Overall use of a cellular phone was not associated with brain tumor risk; the respective odds ratios were 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74, 1.29) for glioma and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.13) for meningioma. Among persons who had used cellular phones for 10 or more years, increased risk was found for glioma (odds ratio = 2.20, 95% CI: 0.94, 5.11) but not for meningioma (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.35, 3.37). No excess of temporal glioma (p = 0.41) or meningioma (p = 0.43) was observed in cellular phone users as compared with nonusers. Cordless phone use was not related to either glioma risk or meningioma risk. In conclusion, no overall increased risk of glioma or meningioma was observed among these cellular phone users; however, for long-term cellular phone users, results need to be confirmed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

18 November 2008 in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBM Blettner
M Blettner
BSB Schlehofer
B Schlehofer
JBJ Breckenkamp
J Breckenkamp
BKB Kowall
B Kowall
SSS Schmiedel
S Schmiedel
GBGabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Objective: The aim of this first phase of a cross-sectional study from Germany was to investigate whether proximity of residence to mobile phone base stations as well as risk perception is associated with health complaints. Methods: The researchers conducted a population-based, multi-phase, cross-sectional study within the context of a large panel survey regularly carried out by a private research institute in Germany. In the initial phase, reported on in this paper, 30 047 persons from a total of 51 444 who took part in the nationwide survey also answered questions on how mobile phone base stations affected their health. A list of 38 health complaints was used. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify predictors of health complaints including proximity of residence to mobile phone base stations and risk perception. Results: Of the 30 047 participants (response rate 58.6%), 18.7% of participants were concerned about adverse health effects of mobile phone base stations, while an additional 10.3% attributed their personal adverse health effects to the exposure from them. Participants who were concerned about or attributed adverse health effects to mobile phone base stations and those living in the vicinity of a mobile phone base station (500 m) reported slightly more health complaints than others. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of the German population is concerned about adverse health effects caused by exposure from mobile phone base stations. The observed slightly higher prevalence of health complaints near base stations can not however be fully explained by attributions or concerns.