Bernard Bourgine

Dr. Bernard Bourgine


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IFIbrahim Fayad
Ibrahim Fayad
Nicolas BaghdadiNicolas Baghdadi
Nicolas Baghdadi
JBJean-Stéphane Bally
Jean-Stéphane Bally
NBNicolas Barbier
Nicolas Barbier
VGValery Gond
Valery Gond
BBBernard Bourgine
Bernard Bourgine
Estimating forest canopy height from large-footprint satellite LiDAR waveforms is challenging given the complex interaction between LiDAR waveforms, terrain, and vegetation, especially in dense tropical and equatorial forests. In this study, canopy height in French Guiana was estimated using multiple linear regression models and the Random Forest technique (RF). This analysis was either based on LiDAR waveform metrics extracted from the GLAS (Geoscience Laser Altimeter System) spaceborne LiDAR data and terrain information derived from the SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) DEM (Digital Elevation Model) or on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of GLAS waveforms. Results show that the best statistical model for estimating forest height based on waveform metrics and digital elevation data is a linear regression of waveform extent, trailing edge extent, and terrain index (RMSE of 3.7 m). For the PCA based models, better canopy height estimation results were observed using a regression model that incorporated both the first 13 principal components (PCs) and the waveform extent (RMSE = 3.8 m). Random Forest regressions revealed that the best configuration for canopy height estimation used all the following metrics: waveform extent, leading edge, trailing edge, and terrain index (RMSE = 3.4 m). Waveform extent was the variable that best explained canopy height, with an importance factor almost three times higher than those for the other three metrics (leading edge, trailing edge, and terrain index). Furthermore, the Random Forest regression incorporating the first 13 PCs and the waveform extent had a slightly-improved canopy height estimation in comparison to the linear model, with an RMSE of 3.6 m. In conclusion, multiple linear regressions and RF regressions provided canopy height estimations with similar precision using either LiDAR metrics or PCs. However, a regression model (linear regression or RF) based on the PCA of waveform samples with waveform extent information is an interesting alternative for canopy height estimation as it does not require several metrics that are difficult to derive from GLAS waveforms in dense forests, such as those in French Guiana.

8 March 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
BBBernard Bourgine
Bernard Bourgine
MSM. Saltel
M. Saltel
NPN. Pedron
N. Pedron
ELE. Lavie
E. Lavie

8 March 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
BBBernard Bourgine
Bernard Bourgine
ÉLÉric Lasseur
Éric Lasseur
ALAurélien Leynet
Aurélien Leynet
GBGuillaume Badinier
Guillaume Badinier
COCarole Ortega
Carole Ortega
VBValentin Bouchet
Valentin Bouchet