Aims: The effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapy with alirocumab or evolocumab on individual clinical efficacy and safety endpoints remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab in patients with dyslipidaemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods and results: We performed a review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab vs. placebo or other lipid-lowering therapies up to March 2018. Primary efficacy endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. We included 39 RCTs comprising 66 478 patients of whom 35 896 were treated with proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (14 639 with alirocumab and 21 257 with evolocumab) and 30 582 with controls. Mean weighted follow-up time across trials was 2.3 years with an exposure time of 150 617 patient-years. Overall, the effects of PCSK9 inhibition on all-cause death and cardiovascular death were not statistically significant (P = 0.15 and P = 0.34, respectively). Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of MI (1.49 vs. 1.93 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.86; I 2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), ischaemic stroke (0.44 vs. 0.58 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67–0.89; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.0005), and coronary revascularization (2.16 vs. 2.64 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.89; I 2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), compared with the control group. Use of these PCSK9 inhibitors was not associated with increased risk of neurocognitive adverse events (P = 0.91), liver enzymes elevations (P = 0.34), rhabdomyolysis (P = 0.58), or new-onset diabetes mellitus (P = 0.97). Conclusion: Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 inhibition with alirocumab or evolocumab was associated with lower risk of MI, stroke, and coronary revascularization, with favourable safety profile.

Phenotypic switch of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of different vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis and restenosis after coronary intervention. MicroRNAs have been identified as key regulators of VSMC biology. The miR-23b is highly expressed in VSMCs and it is involved in differentation, proliferation, and migration of several non-vascular cell types. However, the role of miR-23b in vascular disease is currently unknown. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of miR-23b on VSMC phenotypic switch in vitro and after vascular injury in vivo. To determine the changes of miR-23b expression in the injured arterial wall, we used the standard rat carotid artery balloon injury model. In vivo studies demonstrated that miR-23b is down-regulated after vascular injury. Gain-of-function studies showed that overexpression of miR-23b inhibited VSMC proliferation and migration, whereas the opposite effect was obtained with the in vitro inhibition of miR-23b. We further demonstrated that miR-23b can significantly promote the expression of VSMC marker genes such as smooth muscle α-actin (ACTA2) and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (MYH11). Overexpression of miR-23b in balloon-injured arteries by Ad-miR-23b markedly decreased neointimal hyperplasia. Finally, miR-23b specifically suppresses urokinase-type plasminogen activator, SMAD family member 3, and transcription factor forkhead box O4 (FoxO4) expression in phenotypically modulated VSMCs. By luciferase reporter assay, we validated the transcription factor FoxO4 as a direct target of miR-23b in VSMCs. We identify miR-23b as a novel regulator of VSMC phenotypic switch in vitro and following vascular injury in vivo.

Iterations in stent technologies, advances in pharmacotherapy, and awareness of the implications of implantation techniques have markedly reduced the risk of stent failure, both in the form of stent thrombosis (ST) and in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, given the number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed worldwide every year, ST and ISR, albeit occurring at a fairly low rate, represent a public health problem even with contemporary DES platforms. The understanding of mechanisms and risk factors for these two PCI complications has been of fundamental importance for the parallel evolution of stent technologies. Risk factors associated with ST and ISR are usually divided into patient-, lesion-, device- and procedure-related. A number of studies have shown how certain risk factors are related to early (1 month) versus late/very late ST (between 1 month and 1 year and >1 year, respectively). However, more research is required to conclusively show the role of time-dependence of risk factors also in the incidence of ISR (early [1 year] or late [>1 year]). A thorough risk assessment is required due to the complex etiology of ST and ISR. The most effective strategy to treat ST and ISR is still to prevent them; hence, it is crucial to identify patient-, lesion-, device- and procedure-related predictors.