Vitomir Kovanovic

Dr. Vitomir Kovanovic

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2015 in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJS. Joksimović
S. Joksimović
DGDragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic
VKVitomir Kovanovic
Vitomir Kovanovic
Bernhard RieckeBernhard Riecke
Bernhard Riecke
MHM. Hatala
M. Hatala

3 October 2014 in The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic
VKVitomir Kovanovic
Vitomir Kovanovic
SJSrecko Joksimovic
Srecko Joksimovic
GSGeorge Siemens
George Siemens
This paper reports on the results of an analysis of the research proposals submitted to the MOOC Research Initiative (MRI) funded by the Gates Foundation and administered by Athabasca University. The goal of MRI was to mobilize researchers to engage into critical interrogation of MOOCs. The submissions – 266 in Phase 1, out of which 78 was recommended for resubmission in the extended form in Phase 2, and finally, 28 funded – were analyzed by applying conventional and automated content analysis methods as well as citation network analysis methods. The results revealed the main research themes that could form a framework of the future MOOC research: i) student engagement and learning success, ii) MOOC design and curriculum, iii) self-regulated learning and social learning, iv) social network analysis and networked learning, and v) motivation, attitude and success criteria. The theme of social learning received the greatest interest and had the highest success in attracting funding. The submissions that planned on using learning analytics methods were more successful. The use of mixed methods was by far the most popular. Design-based research methods were also suggested commonly, but the questions about their applicability arose regarding the feasibility to perform multiple iterations in the MOOC context and rather a limited focus on technological support for interventions. The submissions were dominated by the researchers from the field of education (75% of the accepted proposals). Not only was this a possible cause of a complete lack of success of the educational technology innovation theme, but it could be a worrying sign of the fragmentation in the research community and the need to increased efforts towards enhancing interdisciplinarity.

1 October 2015 in The Internet and Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVitomir Kovanovic
Vitomir Kovanovic
DGDragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic
SJSrećko Joksimović
Srećko Joksimović
MHMarek Hatala
Marek Hatala
OAOlusola Adesope
Olusola Adesope

24 September 2016 in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStefan Slater
Stefan Slater
SJSrećko Joksimović
Srećko Joksimović
VKVitomir Kovanovic
Vitomir Kovanovic
RBRyan S. Baker
Ryan S. Baker
DGDragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic
In recent years, a wide array of tools have emerged for the purposes of conducting educational data mining (EDM) and/or learning analytics (LA) research. In this article, we hope to highlight some of the most widely used, most accessible, and most powerful tools available for the researcher interested in conducting EDM/LA research. We will highlight the utility that these tools have with respect to common data preprocessing and analysis steps in a typical research project as well as more descriptive information such as price point and user-friendliness. We will also highlight niche tools in the field, such as those used for Bayesian knowledge tracing (BKT), data visualization, text analysis, and social network analysis. Finally, we will discuss the importance of familiarizing oneself with multiple tools—a data analysis toolbox—for the practice of EDM/LA research.

14 November 2017 in Review of Educational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSrećko Joksimović
Srećko Joksimović
OPOleksandra Poquet
Oleksandra Poquet
VKVitomir Kovanovic
Vitomir Kovanovic
NDNia Dowell
Nia Dowell
CMCaitlin Mills
Caitlin Mills
CBChristopher Brooks
Christopher Brooks
Despite a surge of empirical work on student participation in online learning environments, the causal links between the learning-related factors and processes with the desired learning outcomes remain unexplored. This study presents a systematic literature review of approaches to model learning in Massive Open Online Courses offering an analysis of learning-related constructs used in the prediction and measurement of student engagement and learning outcome. Based on our literature review, we identify current gaps in the research, including a lack of solid frameworks to explain learning in open online setting. Finally, we put forward a novel framework suitable for open online contexts based on a well-established model of student engagement. Our model is intended to guide future work studying the association between contextual factors (i.e., demographic, classroom, and individual needs), student engagement (i.e., academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement metrics), and learning outcomes (i.e., academic, social, and affective). The proposed model affords further interstudy comparisons as well as comparative studies with more traditional education models.

1 September 2015 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SJSrećko Joksimović
Srećko Joksimović
DGDragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic
TLThomas M. Loughin
Thomas M. Loughin
VKVitomir Kovanovic
Vitomir Kovanovic
MHMarek Hatala
Marek Hatala