A markedly reduced interest or pleasure in activities previously considered pleasurable is a main symptom in mood disorder and psychosis and is often present in other psychiatric disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. This condition can be labeled as “anhedonia,” although in its most rigorous connotation the term refers to the lost capacity to feel pleasure that is one aspect of the complex phenomenon of processing and responding to reward. The responses to rewarding stimuli are relatively easy to study in rodents, and the experimental conditions that consistently and persistently impair these responses are used to model anhedonia. To this end, long-term exposure to environmental aversive conditions is primarily used, and the resulting deficits in reward responses are often accompanied by other deficits that are mainly reminiscent of clinical depressive symptoms. The different components of impaired reward responses induced by environmental aversive events can be assessed by different tests or protocols that require different degrees of time allocation, technical resources, and equipment. Rodent models of anhedonia are valuable tools in the study of the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning impaired behavioral responses and in the screening and characterization of drugs that may reverse these behavioral deficits. In particular, the antianhedonic or promotivational effects are relevant features in the spectrum of activities of drugs used in mood disorders or psychosis. Thus, more than the model, it is the choice of tests that is crucial since it influences which facets of anhedonia will be detected and should be tuned to the purpose of the study.
Rats exposed to acute unavoidable stress develop a deficit in escaping avoidable aversive stimuli that lasts as long as unavoidable stress exposure is repeated. A 3‐week exposure to unavoidable stress also reduces dopamine (DA) output in the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS). This study showed that a 7‐day exposure to unavoidable stress induced in rats an escape deficit and a decrease in extraneuronal DA basal concentration in the NAcS. Moreover, animals had reduced DA and serotonin (5‐HT) accumulation after cocaine administration in the medial pre‐frontal cortex (mPFC) and NAcS, compared with control animals. After a 3‐week exposure to unavoidable stress, escape deficit and reduced DA output in the NAcS were still significant at day 14 after the last stress administration. In the mPFC we observed: (i) a short‐term reduction in DA basal levels that was back to control values at day 14; (ii) a decrease in DA accumulation at day 3 followed by a significant increase beyond control values at day 14; (iii) a significant reduction in 5‐HT extraneuronal basal levels at day 3, but not at day 14. Finally, a significant decrease in 5‐HT accumulation following cocaine administration was present in the NAcS and mPFC at day 3, but not at day 14. In conclusion, a long‐term stress exposure induced long‐lasting behavioral sequelae associated with reproducible neurochemical modifications.
Chronic stress induces in rats a decreased reactivity toward noxious stimuli (escape deficit), which can be reverted by antidepressant treatments. The present study reports that this condition of behavioral deficit is accompanied by a decreased level of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens shell. To assess whether this finding was the result of a decreased release or of an enhanced removal of dopamine, we acutely administered cocaine, and 2 h later d‐amphetamine, to stressed and control rats. The increases in dopamine output observed in stressed animals after cocaine administration were significantly lower than those observed in control rats; whereas the total amount of dopamine released after d‐amphetamine administration was similar in both groups of rats. These data suggest a reduced activity of dopaminergic neurons as the possible mechanism underlying dopamine basal level reduction in stressed animals. It is interesting that the stress group showed a locomotor response to cocaine not different from control rats, thus suggesting a condition of sensitization to dopamine receptor stimulation. Imipramine administered daily concomitantly with stress exposure completely reverted the escape deficit condition of chronically stressed rats. Moreover, stressed rats treated with imipramine showed basal and cocaine stimulated levels of extraneuronal dopamine similar to those observed in control animals.
Ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons control reward-driven learning, and their dysregulation can lead to psychiatric disorders. Tonic and phasic activity of these dopaminergic neurons depends on cholinergic tone and activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), particularly those containing the β2 subunit (β2*-nAChRs). Nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors type-α (PPARα) tonically regulate β2*-nAChRs and thereby control dopamine neuron firing activity. However, it is unknown how and when PPARα endogenous ligands are synthesized by dopamine cells. Usingex vivoandin vivoelectrophysiological techniques combined with biochemical and behavioral analysis, we show that activation of α7-nAChRs increases in the rat VTA both the tyrosine phosphorylation of the β2 subunit of nAChRs and the levels of two PPARα endogenous ligands in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Accordingly,in vivoproduction of endogenous PPARα ligands, triggered by α7-nAChR activation, blocks in rats nicotine-induced increased firing activity of dopamine neurons and displays antidepressant-like properties. These data demonstrate that endogenous PPARα ligands are effectors of α7-nAChRs and that their neuromodulatory properties depend on phosphorylation of β2*-nAChRs on VTA dopamine cells. This reveals an autoinhibitory mechanism aimed at reducing dopamine cell overexcitation engaged during hypercholinergic drive. Our results unveil important physiological functions of nAChR/PPARα signaling in dopamine neurons and how behavioral output can change after modifications of this signaling pathway. Overall, the present study suggests PPARα as new therapeutic targets for disorders associated with unbalanced dopamine–acetylcholine systems.