Francisco Arenas

Dr. Francisco Arenas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2006 in Oecologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRoss A. Coleman
Ross A. Coleman
AUAntony J. Underwood
Antony J. Underwood
LBLisandro Benedetti-Cecchi
Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi
PÅPer Åberg
Per Åberg
FAFrancisco Arenas
Francisco Arenas
SHStephen J. Hawkins
Stephen J. Hawkins

1 April 2015 in Journal of Sea Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFrédéric Mineur
Frédéric Mineur
FAFrancisco Arenas
Francisco Arenas
JAJorge Assis
Jorge Assis
ADAndrew J. Davies
Andrew J. Davies
AEAschwin Engelen
Aschwin Engelen
OCOlivier De Clerck
Olivier De Clerck

1 November 2006 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFrancisco Arenas
Francisco Arenas
ISIñiGo Sánchez
IñiGo Sánchez
SHStephen J. Hawkins
Stephen J. Hawkins
SJStuart R. Jenkins
Stuart R. Jenkins
The emergence of the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning debate in the last decade has renewed interest in understanding why some communities are more easily invaded than others and how the impact of invasion on recipient communities and ecosystems varies. To date most of the research on invasibility has focused on taxonomic diversity, i.e., species richness. However, functional diversity of the communities should be more relevant for the resistance of the community to invasions, as the extent of functional differences among the species in an assemblage is a major determinant of ecosystem processes. Although coastal marine habitats are among the most heavily invaded ecosystems, studies on community invasibility and vulnerability in these habitats are scarce. We carried out a manipulative field experiment in tide pools of the rocky intertidal to test the hypothesis that increasing functional richness reduces the susceptibility of macroalgal communities to invasion. We selected a priori four functional groups on the basis of previous knowledge of local species characteristics: encrusting, turf, subcanopy, and canopy species. Synthetic assemblages containing one, two, three, or four different functional groups of seaweeds were created, and invasion by native species was monitored over an eight‐month period. Cover and resource availability in the assemblages with only one functional group showed different patterns in the use of space and light, confirming true functional differences among our groups. Experimental results showed that the identity of functional groups was more important than functional richness in determining the ability of macroalgal communities to resist invasion and that resistance to invasion was resource‐mediated.

28 July 2014 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BMBrezo Martínez
Brezo Martínez
FAFrancisco Arenas
Francisco Arenas
ATAlba Trilla
Alba Trilla
RVRosa M. Viejo
Rosa M. Viejo
FCFrancisco Carreño Conde
Francisco Carreño Conde

4 September 2018 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFabio Bulleri
Fabio Bulleri
BEBritas Klemens Eriksson
Britas Klemens Eriksson
AQAna Queirós
Ana Queirós
LALaura Airoldi
Laura Airoldi
FAFrancisco Arenas
Francisco Arenas
LBLisandro Benedetti-Cecchi
Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi
Habitat-forming species sustain biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in harsh environments through the amelioration of physical stress. Nonetheless, their role in shaping patterns of species distribution under future climate scenarios is generally overlooked. Focusing on coastal systems, we assess how habitat-forming species can influence the ability of stress-sensitive species to exhibit plastic responses, adapt to novel environmental conditions, or track suitable climates. Here, we argue that habitat-former populations could be managed as a nature-based solution against climate-driven loss of biodiversity. Drawing from different ecological and biological disciplines, we identify a series of actions to sustain the resilience of marine habitat-forming species to climate change, as well as their effectiveness and reliability in rescuing stress-sensitive species from increasingly adverse environmental conditions.

1 February 2006 in Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFrancisco Arenas
Francisco Arenas
JBJ.D.D Bishop
J.D.D Bishop
JCJ.T. Carlton
J.T. Carlton
PDP.J. Dyrynda
P.J. Dyrynda
WFW.F. Farnham
W.F. Farnham
CWC.A. Wood
C.A. Wood
In September 2004, a rapid assessment survey for non-native species was conducted at 12 harbours along the south coast of England from East Sussex to Cornwall, focusing on communities of algae and invertebrates colonizing floating pontoons in marinas. Over 80 taxa each of algae and invertebrates were recorded, including 20 recognized non-native species. The southern hemisphere solitary ascidian Corella eumyota was recorded in the UK for the first time and was present at three sites. The colonial ascidian Botrylloides violaceus was also recorded as new to the UK, but was very widespread and has probably been present for a number of years but misidentified as the native congener B. leachi, which was infrequent. Other ascidians included Styela clava, introduced at Plymouth in the early 1950s, which was recorded at all locations visited, and Perophora japonica, which was found only at the Plymouth locality where it first occurred in the UK in 1999. The diverse algal flora included nine alien species previously recorded in the British Isles. Range extensions and population increases were noted for the kelp Undaria pinnatifida and the bryozoan Tricellaria inopinata, both first recorded in UK waters during the 1990s. The widespread occurrence of another non-native bryozoan, Bugula neritina, appears significant, since in earlier times this was known in UK waters predominantly from artificially heated docks. The results of this survey indicate that dock pontoon systems in southern England are significant reservoirs of non-native species dispersed by vessels and other means. The proliferation of these structures is therefore of conservation importance. The new UK records highlight the need for periodic monitoring of ports for non-native species.