Elaine Wethington

Prof. Elaine Wethington

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2006 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDCarol M. Devine
Carol M. Devine
MJMargaret Jastran
Margaret Jastran
JJJennifer Jabs
Jennifer Jabs
EWElaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington
TFTracy J. Farell
Tracy J. Farell
CBCarole A. Bisogni
Carole A. Bisogni

1 May 2005 in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EWElaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington

1 June 2009 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristine E. Blake
Christine E. Blake
CDCarol M. Devine
Carol M. Devine
EWElaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington
MJMargaret Jastran
Margaret Jastran
TFTracy J. Farrell
Tracy J. Farrell
CBCarole A. Bisogni
Carole A. Bisogni

2 May 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PAPhil Adams
Phil Adams
EMElizabeth L. Murnane
Elizabeth L. Murnane
MEMichael Elfenbein
Michael Elfenbein
EWElaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington
GGGeri Gay
Geri Gay
To better support the self-management of chronic pain, this paper investigates how those living with the condition prefer to self-assess their pain levels using smartphones. Our work consists of three stages: design ideation and review, an in-lab user study with 10 participants resulting in nine candidate interfaces, and a 3 week field trial of two further honed measures with 12 participants. This research firstly yields a better understanding of participants' strong and sometimes contrasting preferences regarding their self-assessment of pain intensity. We additionally contribute two novel interfaces that support accurate, quick, and repeated use along with other participant-valued interactions (e.g., familiar, relatable, and highly usable). In particular, we focus on designing tailored measures that both enhance respondent motivation as well as minimize the difficulty of meaningful self-assessment by supporting the cognitive effort in translating a subjective experience into a single numerical value.

Xue ZhangXue Zhang
Xue Zhang
MWMildred E. Warner
Mildred E. Warner
EWElaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington
In the US, rural communities face challenges to meet the community health needs of older adults and children. Meanwhile, rural areas lag in age-friendly built environment and services. AARP, a US based organization promoting livability for all ages, has developed a Livability Index based on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) domains of age-friendly communities: health, housing, neighborhood, transportation, environment, engagement, and opportunity. This study links the 2018 AARP Livability Index categories with demographic structure and socio-economic factors from the American Community Survey at the county level in the US to examine if the physical, built and social environment differentiate communities with better community health across the rural–urban divide. Results show that the neighborhood built environment has the largest impact on community health for all county types. Although rural areas lag in community health, those which give more attention to engagement and opportunity rank higher. Rural communities with more African Americans, children, and poor Whites, rank lower on community health. While neighborhood characteristics have the strongest link to community health, a broader approach with attention to age, race, poverty and engagement and opportunity is needed for rural areas.

5 November 2009 in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EWElaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington
WJWendy L. Johnson-Askew
Wendy L. Johnson-Askew
Background. The life course perspective (LCP) has emerged as a powerful organizing framework for the study of health, illness, and mortality. LCP repre