Update on the applications and limitations of alpha-fetoprotein for hepatocellular carcinoma

Interferon (IFN) α inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication both clinically and in vitro ; however, the complete spectrum of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) expressed in the HCV-infected liver or the genes responsible for control of HCV replication have not been defined. To better define ISG expression in the chronically infected HCV liver, DNA microarray analysis was performed on 9 individuals with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). A total of 232 messenger RNAs were differentially regulated in CHC compared with nondiseased liver controls. A significant proportion of these were potential ISGs that were transcriptionally elevated, suggesting an ongoing response to endogenous IFN and/or double-stranded RNA. One ISG significantly elevated in all patients was viperin, an evolutionary conserved ISG that has antiviral activity against human cytomegalovirus. Stimulation of Huh-7 and HepG2 cells with IFN-α or -γ revealed viperin is predominantly a type I ISG. Furthermore, viperin expression could also be induced following transfection of Huh-7 cells with either poly(I:C) or HCV RNA. Transient expression of viperin in cells harboring the HCV genomic replicon resulted in a significant decrease in HCV replication, suggesting that viperin has anti-HCV activity. In conclusion , even in the face of a persistent HCV infection, there is an active ISG antiviral cellular response, highlighting the complexity of the host viral relationship. Furthermore, ISG viperin has anti-HCV activity in vitro ; we postulate that viperin, along with other ISGs, acts to limit HCV replication. (Hepatology 2005.)

Interferon regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) activation directs α/β interferon production and interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression, which limits virus infection. Here, we examined the distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural 3 protein, the status of IRF-3 activation, and expression of IRF-3 target genes and ISGs during asynchronous HCV infection in vitro and in liver biopsies from patients with chronic HCV infection, using confocal microscopy and functional genomics approaches. In general, asynchronous infection with HCV stimulated a low-frequency and transient IRF-3 activation within responsive cells in vitro that was associated with cell-to-cell virus spread. Similarly, a subset of HCV patients exhibited the nuclear, active form of IRF-3 in hepatocytes and an associated increase in IRF-3 target gene expression in hepatic tissue. Moreover, ISG expression profiles formed disease-specific clusters for HCV and control nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients, with increased ISG expression among the HCV patients. We identified the presence of T cell and plasmacytoid dendritic cell infiltrates within all biopsy specimens, suggesting they could be a source of hepatic interferon in the setting of hepatitis C and chronic inflammatory condition. Conclusion: These results indicate that HCV can transiently trigger IRF-3 activation during virus spread and that in chronic HCV, IRF-3 activation within infected hepatocytes occurs but is limited.

Background & Aims In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, interferon alfa (IFN-α) alters expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), but little is understood about factors that determine outcomes of therapy. We used a systems biology approach to evaluate the acute response of patients with chronic hepatitis C to IFN-α therapy. Methods We collected liver biopsy samples from 8 treatment-naïve patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection at baseline and 24 hours after treatment with IFN-α-2a (10 MU subcutaneously). Blood samples were collected before and up to 48 hours after administration of IFN-α-2a to measure HCV RNA levels and for gene expression analysis. Patients then received pegylated IFN-α-2a and ribavirin on day 5 of the study; therapy continued for up to 48 weeks. Results Based on the kinetics of HCV RNA during the first 12 weeks of therapy, 2 patients were rapid virologic responders, 4 were early virologic responders, and 2 did not respond to therapy (nonresponders). Nonresponders had high pretreatment levels of ISG expression in the liver but not in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In responders, after administration of IFN-α, intrahepatic ISG expression increased significantly from baseline and was associated with a rapid phase 1 decrease in HCV. We identified distinct hepatic expression and tissue distribution patterns of ISGs that segregated with treatment outcome. Importantly, Kupffer cells were a local source of IFN that promoted basal expression of ISG in hepatocytes of nonresponders. This finding was validated in cultured THP1 human macrophages that expressed IFN-β after exposure to viable HCV 2a. When Huh7 K2040 and Huh7 L2198S hepatoma cells were incubated with IFN-α-2a, expression of ISGs peaked by 4 hours and decreased by 72 hours, associated with an increase in level of HCV RNA. This indicates that constitutive exposure to IFN causes hepatoma cells to become tolerant of ISG function. Conclusions In patients with chronic HCV infection, IFN production by Kupffer cells might promote innate immune tolerance, characterized by a lack of response to IFN therapy. Strategies to disrupt the virus-host interactions that induce innate immune tolerance should improve therapy.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for sampling numerous viral variants from infected patients. This provides a novel opportunity to represent and study the mutational landscape of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) within a single host.

Background and Aims: The clinical utility of two biomarkers, hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg), as compared to conventional markers of HBV replication and disease activity, is unclear. Approach and Results: Untreated participants in the North American Hepatitis B Research Network Adult Cohort Study were categorized by chronic hepatitis B (CHB) phases based on HBsAg and HBeAg status and HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. HBV RNA and HBcrAg were measured (Abbott HBV pgRNA Research Assay and Fujirebio Lumipulse Immunoassay, respectively), and cross‐sectional associations with conventional CHB markers were tested. Among 1,409 participants across all CHB phases, median HBV DNA was 3.8 log₁₀ IU/mL and ALT was 34 U/L. HBV RNA was quantifiable in 99% of HBeAg⁺ and 58% of HBeAg⁻ participants; HBcrAg was quantifiable in 20% of HBeAg⁺ (above linear range in the other 80%) and 51% of HBeAg⁻ participants. Both markers differed across CHB phases (P < 0.001), with higher levels in the HBeAg⁺ and HBeAg⁻ immune active phases. HBV RNA and HBcrAg correlated moderately strongly with HBV DNA in both HBeAg⁺ and HBeAg⁻ phases (HBV RNA: e⁺ ρ = 0.84; e⁻ ρ = 0.78; HBcrAg: e⁺ ρ = 0.66; e⁻ ρ = 0.56; P for all, <0.001), but with HBsAg levels among HBeAg⁺ phases only (HBV RNA: e⁺ ρ = 0.71; P < 0.001; e⁻ ρ = 0.18; P = 0.56; HBcrAg: e⁺ ρ = 0.51; P < 0.001; e⁻ ρ = 0.27; P < 0.001). Associations of higher HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels with higher ALT, APRI, and Fibrosis‐4 levels were consistent in HBeAg⁻, but not HBeAg⁺, phases. Conclusions: Despite clear relationships between HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels and CHB phases, these markers have limited additional value in differentiating CHB phases because of their strong association with HBV DNA and, to a lesser extent, with clinical disease indicators.