Transforaminal epidural injection is used to treat radicular pain. However, there is no objective method of assessing pain relief following transforaminal injection. Perfusion index is a metric for monitoring peripheral perfusion status. This study evaluates the correlation between perfusion index change and analgesic efficacy in transforaminal blocks for lumbosacral radicular pain. We retrospectively analyzed data of 100 patients receiving transforaminal block for lumbosacral radicular pain. We assessed perfusion index before treatment and at 5, 15, and 30 min following the block. We defined responders (group R) and non-responders (group N) as those with ≥50% and <50% pain reduction, respectively, 30 min following block. Clinical data and perfusion index of the groups were analyzed. Ninety-two patients were examined, of whom 57 (61.9%) and 35 (38.0%) patients reported ≥50% and <50% pain reduction, respectively. Group R had a significantly higher perfusion index change ratio 5 min following the block (p = 0.029). A perfusion index change ratio of ≥0.27 was observed in group R (sensitivity, 75.4%; specificity, 51.4%; AUC (area under the curve), 0.636; p = 0.032). A perfusion index change ratio of ≥0.27 at 5 min after block is associated with, but does not predict improvement in, pain levels following lumbosacral transforaminal block.

Background: Endotracheal tube (ETT) with a tapered-shaped cuff had an improved sealing effect when compared to ETTs with a conventional cylindrical-shaped cuff. Positional change and neck movement typically displace an ETT and change the intracuff pressure. The aim of the current study was to compare the ETT cuff pressure in the TaperGuard ETT vs the conventional ETT after a change from the supine, neutral position to the extension of the neck and semi-Fowler position for thyroid surgery. Methods: This prospective, randomized clinical trial included 50 patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into one of the 2 groups: tracheal intubation with the TaperGuard ETT or with a conventional ETT. The ETT cuff was inflated with air and the ETT cuff pressure was set initially at 20 cmH₂O using a calibrated cuff manometer. ETT cuff pressure and distance from carina to ETT tip were measured at supine and semi-Fowler positions with neck extension. Results: After the position change, the ETT tip migrated cephalad and cuff pressure increased in the majority of cases. ETT cuff pressure was significantly higher in the TaperGuard group than the conventional group (28.0 ± 6.6 cmH₂O and 22.8 ± 4.5 cmH₂O, respectively, P = .001). The degree of cephalad displacement of the ETT tip was comparable between the 2 groups (19.4 ± 6.31 mm in TaperGuard group and 21.9 ± 6.9 mm in conventional group, P = .12). Conclusions: After the position change from supine to hyperextension of the neck, the ETT cuff pressure was higher in the TaperGuard ETT than in the conventional ETT, although the extent of displacement of the ETT was comparable between the 2 groups.