Daniel Rawle

Dr. Daniel Rawle

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRichard J. Mills
Richard J. Mills
SHSean J. Humphrey
Sean J. Humphrey
PFPatrick R.J. Fortuna
Patrick R.J. Fortuna
MLMary Lor
Mary Lor
SFSimon R. Foster
Simon R. Foster
JHJames E. Hudson
James E. Hudson

8 June 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlberto A. Amarilla
Alberto A. Amarilla
JSJulian D. J. Sng
Julian D. J. Sng
Rhys ParryRhys Parry
Rhys Parry
JDJoshua M. Deerain
Joshua M. Deerain
JPJames R. Potter
James R. Potter
AKAlexander Khromykh
Alexander Khromykh
The current COVID-19 pandemic is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We demonstrate that despite the large size of the viral RNA genome (~30 kb), infectious full-length cDNA is readily assembled in vitro by a circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) methodology without the need for technically demanding intermediate steps. Overlapping cDNA fragments are generated from viral RNA and assembled together with a linker fragment containing CMV promoter into a circular full-length viral cDNA in a single reaction. Transfection of the circular cDNA into mammalian cells results in the recovery of infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus that exhibits properties comparable to the parental virus in vitro and in vivo. CPER is also used to generate insect-specific Casuarina virus with ~20 kb genome and the human pathogens Ross River virus (Alphavirus) and Norovirus (Calicivirus), with the latter from a clinical sample. Additionally, reporter and mutant viruses are generated and employed to study virus replication and virus-receptor interactions.

2 July 2021 in PLOS Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDaniel Rawle
Daniel Rawle
TLThuy T. Le
Thuy T. Le
TDTroy Dumenil
Troy Dumenil
KYKexin Yan
Kexin Yan
BTBing Tang
Bing Tang
ASAndreas Suhrbier
Andreas Suhrbier
SARS-CoV-2 uses the human ACE2 (hACE2) receptor for cell attachment and entry, with mouse ACE2 (mACE2) unable to support infection. Herein we describe an ACE2-lentivirus system and illustrate its utility forin vitroandin vivoSARS-CoV-2 infection models. Transduction of non-permissive cell lines with hACE2 imparted replication competence, and transduction with mACE2 containing N30D, N31K, F83Y and H353K substitutions, to match hACE2, rescued SARS-CoV-2 replication. Intrapulmonary hACE2-lentivirus transduction of C57BL/6J mice permitted significant virus replication in lung epithelium. RNA-Seq and histological analyses illustrated that this model involved an acute inflammatory disease followed by resolution and tissue repair, with a transcriptomic profile similar to that seen in COVID-19 patients. hACE2-lentivirus transduction of IFNAR-/-and IL-28RA-/-mouse lungs was used to illustrate that loss of type I or III interferon responses have no significant effect on virus replication. However, their importance in driving inflammatory responses was illustrated by RNA-Seq analyses. We also demonstrate the utility of the hACE2-lentivirus transduction system for vaccine evaluation in C57BL/6J mice. The ACE2-lentivirus system thus has broad application in SARS-CoV-2 research, providing a tool for both mutagenesis studies and mouse model development.

27 July 2022 in Virus Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KYKexin Yan
Kexin Yan
TDTroy Dumenil
Troy Dumenil
BTBing Tang
Bing Tang
TLThuy T Le
Thuy T Le
CBCameron R Bishop
Cameron R Bishop
DRDaniel Rawle
Daniel Rawle
Human ACE2 Human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) is the key cell attachment and entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the original SARS-CoV-2 isolates unable to use mouse ACE2 (mACE2). Herein we describe the emergence of a SARS-CoV-2 strain capable of ACE2-independent infection and the evolution of mouse-adapted (MA) SARS-CoV-2 by in vitro serial passaging of virus in co-cultures of cell lines expressing hACE2 and mACE2. MA viruses evolved with up to five amino acid changes in the spike protein, all of which have been seen in human isolates. MA viruses replicated to high titers in C57BL/6J mouse lungs and nasal turbinates and caused characteristic lung histopathology. One MA virus also evolved to replicate efficiently in several ACE2-negative cell lines across several species, including clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) ACE2 knockout cells. An E484D substitution is likely involved in ACE2-independent entry and has appeared in only ≈0.003 per cent of human isolates globally, suggesting that it provided no significant selection advantage in humans. ACE2-independent entry reveals a SARS-CoV-2 infection mechanism that has potential implications for disease pathogenesis, evolution, tropism, and perhaps also intervention development.

5 May 2020 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WNWilson Nguyen
Wilson Nguyen
ENEri Nakayama
Eri Nakayama
KYKexin Yan
Kexin Yan
BTBing Tang
Bing Tang
TLThuy T. Le
Thuy T. Le
ASAndreas Suhrbier
Andreas Suhrbier
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), Ross River virus (RRV), o’nyong nyong virus (ONNV), Mayaro virus (MAYV) and Getah virus (GETV) represent arthritogenic alphaviruses belonging to the Semliki Forest virus antigenic complex. Antibodies raised against one of these viruses can cross-react with other serogroup members, suggesting that, for instance, a CHIKV vaccine (deemed commercially viable) might provide cross-protection against antigenically related alphaviruses. Herein we use human alphavirus isolates (including a new human RRV isolate) and wild-type mice to explore whether infection with one virus leads to cross-protection against viremia after challenge with other members of the antigenic complex. Persistently infected Rag1-/- mice were also used to assess the cross-protective capacity of convalescent CHIKV serum. We also assessed the ability of a recombinant poxvirus-based CHIKV vaccine and a commercially available formalin-fixed, whole-virus GETV vaccine to induce cross-protective responses. Although cross-protection and/or cross-reactivity were clearly evident, they were not universal and were often suboptimal. Even for the more closely related viruses (e.g., CHIKV and ONNV, or RRV and GETV), vaccine-mediated neutralization and/or protection against the intended homologous target was significantly more effective than cross-neutralization and/or cross-protection against the heterologous virus. Effective vaccine-mediated cross-protection would thus likely require a higher dose and/or more vaccinations, which is likely to be unattractive to regulators and vaccine manufacturers.

1 February 2016 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlex J. Fulcher
Alex J. Fulcher
HSHaran Sivakumaran
Haran Sivakumaran
HJHongping Jin
Hongping Jin
DRDaniel Rawle
Daniel Rawle
DHDavid Harrich
David Harrich
DJDavid Jans
David Jans