Ben Beck

Prof. Ben Beck

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in Resuscitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BBBen Beck
Ben Beck
JBJanet Bray
Janet Bray
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
KSKaren Smith
Karen Smith
TWTony Walker
Tony Walker
JFJudith Finn
Judith Finn
The aim of this study was to investigate regional variation in the characteristics, incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Australia and New Zealand. This was a population-based cohort study of OHCA using data from the Aus-ROC Australian and New Zealand OHCA Epistry over the period of 01 January 2015-31 December 2015. Seven ambulance services contributed data to the Epistry with a capture population of 19.8 million people. All OHCA attended by ambulance, regardless of aetiology or patient age, were included. In 2015, there were 19,722 OHCA cases recorded in the Aus-ROC Epistry with an overall crude incidence of 102.5 cases per 100,000 population (range: 51.0-107.7 per 100,000 population). Of all OHCA cases attended by EMS (excluding EMS-witnessed cases), bystander CPR was performed in 41% of cases (range: 36%-50%). Resuscitation was attempted (by EMS) in 48% of cases (range: 40%-68%). The crude incidence for attempted resuscitation cases was 47.6 per 100,000 population (range: 34.7-54.1 per 100,000 population). Of cases with attempted resuscitation, 28% survived the event (range: 21%-36%) and 12% survived to hospital discharge or 30 days (range: 9%-17%; data provided by five ambulance services). In the first results of the Aus-ROC Australian and New Zealand OHCA Epistry, significant regional variation in the incidence, characteristics and outcomes was observed. Understanding the system-level and public health drivers of this variation will assist in optimisation of the chain of survival provided to OHCA patients with the aim of improving outcomes.

23 June 2018 in BJS Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BBBen Beck
Ben Beck
PCP. Cameron
P. Cameron
JLJ. Lowthian
J. Lowthian
MFM. Fitzgerald
M. Fitzgerald
RJR. Judson
R. Judson
BGB. J Gabbe
B. J Gabbe
Background Globally, populations are ageing, creating challenges for trauma system design. Despite this, little is known about causes of injury and long‐term outcomes in older injured patients. This study aims to describe temporal trends in the incidence, causes and functional outcomes of major trauma in older adults. Methods The population‐based Victorian State Trauma Registry was used to identify patients with major trauma aged 65 years and older with a date of injury between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016. Temporal trends in population‐based incidence rates were evaluated. Functional outcome was measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale – Extended. Results There were 9250 older adults with major trauma during the study period. Low falls were the most common mechanism of injury (62·5 per cent), followed by transport‐related events (22·2 per cent) and high falls (9·5 per cent). The number of patients with major trauma aged 65 years and older more than doubled from 2007 to 2016, and the incidence increased by 4·3 per cent per year (incidence rate ratio 1·043, 95 per cent c.i. 1·035 to 1·050; P < 0·001). At 12 months after injury, 41·8 per cent of older adults with major trauma had died, and 52·2 per cent of those who survived to hospital discharge were not living independently. Conclusions The number and proportion of older adults with major trauma are increasing rapidly and this will impact on trauma system design. Given the poor long‐term outcomes, there needs to be greater emphasis on ensuring that appropriate interventions are targeted to the right patients and enhanced efforts in primary prevention.

1 July 2019 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBen Beck
Ben Beck
DCDerek Chong
Derek Chong
JOJake Olivier
Jake Olivier
MPMonica Perkins
Monica Perkins
ATAnthony Tsay
Anthony Tsay
MJMarilyn Johnson
Marilyn Johnson

1 November 2016 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBen Beck
Ben Beck
Mark StevensonMark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson
SNStuart Newstead
Stuart Newstead
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
RJRodney Judson
Rodney Judson
Belinda GabbeBelinda Gabbe
Belinda Gabbe

1 February 2019 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMChristopher Morrison
Christopher Morrison
JTJason Thompson
Jason Thompson
MKMichelle C. Kondo
Michelle C. Kondo
BBBen Beck
Ben Beck

19 August 2022 in Transport Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLauren Pearson
Lauren Pearson
DBDanielle Berkovic
Danielle Berkovic
SRSandy Reeder
Sandy Reeder
Belinda GabbeBelinda Gabbe
Belinda Gabbe
BBBen Beck
Ben Beck
Riding a bike for transport purposes is an effective way to improve population and environmental health. Despite this, participation levels in many countries are low. Identifying the barriers and enablers to riding a bike for transport is essential to developing interventions that encourage bike riding. In this mixed-methods systematic review, we aimed to identify the perceived barriers and enablers to adults riding a bike for transport in Organisation for Economic Development (OECD) countries. A systematic database search was conducted to identify relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature. Fourty-five papers/reports met eligibility criteria. There were 34 barriers and 21 enablers identified. The leading barriers related to riding on the road alongside motor vehicles. Other factors identified included the provision and quality of cycling infrastructure, personal factors such as physical fitness, attitudinal factors such as community perceptions of cyclists, and environmental factors. While this review highlights the complexity of factors that influence the uptake of riding a bike for transport, many of the leading factors could be overcome through the provision of high-quality protected infrastructure for bike riders. Other interventions to address other known barriers and enablers are needed to increase the uptake of bike riding.