Jaakko Kukkonen

Prof. Jaakko Kukkonen

Research Professor, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LJLasse Johansson
Lasse Johansson
JJJukka-Pekka Jalkanen
Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen
Jaakko KukkonenJaakko Kukkonen
Jaakko Kukkonen

2 January 2012 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jaakko KukkonenJaakko Kukkonen
Jaakko Kukkonen
TOT. Olsson
T. Olsson
DSD. M. Schultz
D. M. Schultz
Alexander BaklanovAlexander Baklanov
Alexander Baklanov
TKT. Klein
T. Klein
KEK. Eben
K. Eben
Numerical models that combine weather forecasting and atmospheric chemistry are here referred to as chemical weather forecasting models. Eighteen operational chemical weather forecasting models on regional and continental scales in Europe are described and compared in this article. Topics discussed in this article include how weather forecasting and atmospheric chemistry models are integrated into chemical weather forecasting systems, how physical processes are incorporated into the models through parameterization schemes, how the model architecture affects the predicted variables, and how air chemistry and aerosol processes are formulated. In addition, we discuss sensitivity analysis and evaluation of the models, user operational requirements, such as model availability and documentation, and output availability and dissemination. In this manner, this article allows for the evaluation of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the various modelling systems and modelling approaches. Finally, this article highlights the most prominent gaps of knowledge for chemical weather forecasting models and suggests potential priorities for future research directions, for the following selected focus areas: emission inventories, the integration of numerical weather prediction and atmospheric chemical transport models, boundary conditions and nesting of models, data assimilation of the various chemical species, improved understanding and parameterization of physical processes, better evaluation of models against data and the construction of model ensembles.

12 March 2013 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJukka-Pekka Jalkanen
Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen
LJLasse Johansson
Lasse Johansson
Jaakko KukkonenJaakko Kukkonen
Jaakko Kukkonen
This study addresses the exhaust emissions of CO2, NO x , SO x , CO, and PM2.5 originated from Baltic Sea shipping in 2006–2009. Numerical results have been computed using the Ship Traffic Emissions Assessment Model. This model is based on the messages of the automatic identification system (AIS), which enable the positioning of ships with a high spatial resolution. The NO x emissions in 2009 were approximately 7 % higher than in 2006, despite the economic recession. However, the SO x emissions in 2009 were approximately 14 % lower, when compared to those in 2006, mainly caused by the fuel requirements of the SO x emission control area (SECA) which became effective in May 2006, but affected also by changes in ship activity. Results are presented on the differential geographic distribution of shipping emissions before (Jan–April 2006) and after (Jan–April 2009) the SECA regulations. The predicted NO x emissions in 2009 substantially exceeded the emissions in 2006 along major ship routes and at numerous harbors, mostly due to the continuous increase in the number of small vessels that use AIS transmitters. Although the SO x emissions have been reduced in 2009 in most major ship routes, these have increased in the vicinity of some harbors and on some densely trafficked routes. A seasonal variation of emissions is also presented, as well as the distribution of emissions in terms of vessel flag state, type, and weight.

15 April 2020 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jaakko KukkonenJaakko Kukkonen
Jaakko Kukkonen
Susana Lopez-AparicioSusana Lopez-Aparicio
Susana Lopez-Aparicio
DSDavid Segersson
David Segersson
CGCamilla Geels
Camilla Geels
LKLeena Kangas
Leena Kangas
JBJørgen Brandt
Jørgen Brandt
Residential wood combustion (RWC) is an important contributor to air quality in numerous regions worldwide. This study is the first extensive evaluation of the influence of RWC on ambient air quality in several Nordic cities. We have analysed the emissions and concentrations of PM2.5 in cities within four Nordic countries: in the metropolitan areas of Copenhagen, Oslo, and Helsinki and in the city of Umeå. We have evaluated the emissions for the relevant urban source categories and modelled atmospheric dispersion on regional and urban scales. The emission inventories for RWC were based on local surveys, the amount of wood combusted, combustion technologies and other relevant factors. The accuracy of the predicted concentrations was evaluated based on urban concentration measurements. The predicted annual average concentrations ranged spatially from 4 to 7 µg m−3 (2011), from 6 to 10 µg m−3 (2013), from 4 to more than 13 µg m−3 (2013) and from 9 to more than 13 µg m−3 (2014), in Umeå, Helsinki, Oslo and Copenhagen, respectively. The higher concentrations in Copenhagen were mainly caused by the relatively high regionally and continentally transported background contributions. The annual average fractions of PM2.5 concentrations attributed to RWC within the considered urban regions ranged spatially from 0 % to 15 %, from 0 % to 20 %, from 8 % to 22 % and from 0 % to 60 % in Helsinki, Copenhagen, Umeå and Oslo, respectively. In particular, the contributions of RWC in central Oslo were larger than 40 % as annual averages. In Oslo, wood combustion was used mainly for the heating of larger blocks of flats. In contrast, in Helsinki, RWC was solely used in smaller detached houses. In Copenhagen and Helsinki, the highest fractions occurred outside the city centre in the suburban areas. In Umeå, the highest fractions occurred both in the city centre and its surroundings.

16 November 2000 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jaakko KukkonenJaakko Kukkonen
Jaakko Kukkonen
EVEsko Valkonen
Esko Valkonen
JWJari Walden
Jari Walden
TKTarja Koskentalo
Tarja Koskentalo
PAPäivi Aarnio
Päivi Aarnio
RKRaimo Kartastenpää
Raimo Kartastenpää

HLHeli Lehtomäki
Heli Lehtomäki
AKAntti Korhonen
Antti Korhonen
AAArja Asikainen
Arja Asikainen
NKNiko Karvosenoja
Niko Karvosenoja
KKKaarle Kupiainen
Kaarle Kupiainen
Otto HanninenOtto Hanninen
Otto Hanninen
Air pollution has been estimated to be one of the leading environmental health risks in Finland. National health impact estimates existing to date have focused on particles (PM) and ozone (O3). In this work, we quantify the impacts of particles, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in 2015, and analyze the related uncertainties. The exposures were estimated with a high spatial resolution chemical transport model, and adjusted to observed concentrations. We calculated the health impacts according to Word Health Organization (WHO) working group recommendations. According to our results, ambient air pollution caused a burden of 34,800 disability-adjusted life years (DALY). Fine particles were the main contributor (74%) to the disease burden, which is in line with the earlier studies. The attributable burden was dominated by mortality (32,900 years of life lost (YLL); 95%). Impacts differed between population age groups. The burden was clearly higher in the adult population over 30 years (98%), due to the dominant role of mortality impacts. Uncertainties due to the concentration–response functions were larger than those related to exposures.