This comprehensive review explores the existing literature on the effects of radiotherapy on testicular function, focusing mainly on spermatogenic effects, but also with a brief report on endocrine abnormalities. Data from animal experiments as well as results on humans either from clinical studies or from accidental radiation exposure are included to demonstrate a complete perspective on the level of vulnerability of the testes and their various cellular components to irradiation. Even relatively low doses of radiation, produced either from direct testicular irradiation or more commonly from scattered doses, may often lead to detrimental effects on sperm count and quality. Leydig cells are more radioresistant; however, they can still be influenced by the doses used in clinical practice. The potential resultant fertility complications of cancer radiotherapy should be always discussed with the patient before treatment initiation, and all available and appropriate fertility preservation measures should be taken to ensure the future reproductive potential of the patient. The topic of potential hereditary effects of germ cell irradiation remains a controversial field with ethical implications, requiring future research.

Purpose: We conducted a phase II randomized noncomparative window of opportunity (WOO) trial to evaluate the inhibition of cellular proliferation and the modulation of immune microenvironment after treatment with olaparib alone or in combination with cisplatin or durvalumab in patients with operable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Experimental Design: Forty-one patients with HNSCC were randomized to cisplatin plus olaparib (arm A), olaparib alone (arm B), no treatment (arm C) or durvalumab plus olaparib (arm D). The primary endpoint was to evaluate the percentage of patients in each arm that achieved a reduction of at least 25% in Ki67. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), safety, and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Paired baseline and resection tumor biopsies and blood samples were evaluated for prespecified biomarkers.Results: A decrease in Ki67 of at least 25% was observed in 44.8% of treated patients, as measured by quantitative immunofluorescence. The ORR among treated patients was 12.1%. pCR was observed in 2 patients. Two serious adverse events occurred in 2 patients.Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels [combined positive score (CPS)] were significantly higher after treatment in arms A and D. Expression of CD163 and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) genes, markers of M2 macrophages, increased significantly posttreatment whereas the expression of CD80, a marker of M1 macrophages, decreased.Conclusion: Preoperative olaparib with cisplatin or alone or with durvalumab was safe in the preoperative setting and led to decrease in Ki67 of at least 25% in 44.8% of treated patients. Olaparib-based treatment modulates the tumor microenvironment leading to upregulation of PD-L1 and induction of protumor features of macrophages.Significance: HNSCC is characterized by defective DNA repair pathways and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. PARP inhibitors, which promote DNA damage and “reset” the inflammatory tumor microenvironment, can establish an effective antitumor response. This phase II WOO trial in HNSCC demonstrated the immunomodulatory effects of PARP inhibitor–induced DNA damage. In this chemo-naïve population, PARP inhibitor–based treatment, reduced tumor cell proliferation and modulated tumor microenvironment. After olaparib upregulation of PD-L1 and macrophages, suggests that combinatorial treatment might be beneficial.Synopsis: Our WOO study demonstrates that preoperative olaparib results in a reduction in Ki67, upregulation of PD-L1 CPS, and induction of protumor features of macrophages in HNSCC.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) includes various malignancies and represents the seventh most common cancer worldwide. The early diagnosis of HNC results in a 70–90% five-year survival rate, which declines with locally advanced stages of disease. Current care employs a multimodal strategy encompassing surgery, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, while treatment options vary according to the stage, tumor features, and patient characteristics. About 75% of patients with HNC will benefit from RT, either as a primary treatment or as adjuvant therapy following surgical resection. Technological improvements in RT, such as intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and image-guided RT (IGRT), have enhanced tumor targeting and minimized adjacent healthy tissue irradiation while also expanding RT to the recurrent or metastatic setting. Innovative therapeutic strategies for HNC integrate RT with immunotherapy, gene therapy, molecular targeted therapy, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and nanoparticles (NPs), with the objective of optimizing tumor control while reducing damage to normal tissues. NPs are emerging as possible radiosensitizers in HNC treatment, enhancing the efficacy of RT, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. In vivo and in vitro studies on the irradiation of tumors containing gold (Au), gadolinium (Gd), and hafnium oxide (HfO₂) NPs show promising results in enhancing tumor destruction and survival rates, indicating their potential for clinical application. Hyperthermia, investigated as an adjunct treatment, potentially improves outcomes when combined with RT or chemotherapy, with advancements in nanotechnology renewing interest in this approach in HNC. At present, NBTXR3 is the sole NP that is being investigated in clinical trials for the enhancement of HNC RT.

Background: Radiotherapy represents one of the main therapeutic modalities for localized prostate cancer. In the last two decades, emerging data regarding the radiobiology of prostate cancer suggests a very low α/β value which has led the scientific community to evaluate the potential advantage of hypofractionation. Objective: The aim of this manuscript is to present the rationale of prostate radiobiology and the medical evidence of moderate hypofractionation for prostate cancer. Methods: Existing literature was reviewed, including data from prospective clinical trials dealing with the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy. Fifteen prospective phase II studies, nine randomized phase III studies, and ten meta-analyses were selected. For every study included, the equivalent dose was calculated for both biochemical control and late toxicity. Results: The efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy, compared to conventional radiotherapy, regarding biochemical control, was evaluated in five superiority and four non-inferiority randomized phase III studies. The majority of participants in these studies were patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Even though the superiority criterion of the hypofractionation was not met in all studies, the non-inferiority criterion was. Prospective phase II studies of hypofractionation reported a low rate of acute and late toxicity. In randomized phase III studies, acute and late toxicity grade 3 and higher for the bowel and bladder were comparable between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy. The included meta-analyses showed no difference in efficacy and toxicity. Conclusion: Moderate hypofractionation is feasible and safe and may be considered an alternative option in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.