BANDAR BABGI

Dr. BANDAR BABGI

king AbdulAziz University ,Jeddah ,Saudi Arabia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NYNor Saadah Mohd Yusof
Nor Saadah Mohd Yusof
BBBANDAR BABGI
BANDAR BABGI
YAYousef Alghamdi
Yousef Alghamdi
MAMECİT AKSU
MECİT AKSU
JMJagannathan Madhavan
Jagannathan Madhavan
Muthupandian AshokkumarMuthupandian Ashokkumar
Muthupandian Ashokkumar
Acoustic cavitation in a liquid medium generates several physical and chemical effects. The oscillation and collapse of cavitation bubbles, driven at low ultrasonic frequencies (e.g., 20 kHz), can generate strong shear forces, microjets, microstreaming and shockwaves. Such strong physical forces have been used in cleaning and flux improvement of ultrafiltration processes. These physical effects have also been shown to deactivate pathogens. The efficiency of deactivation of pathogens is not only dependent on ultrasonic experimental parameters, but also on the properties of the pathogens themselves. Bacteria with thick shell wall are found to be resistant to ultrasonic deactivation process. Some evidence does suggest that the chemical effects (radicals) of acoustic cavitation are also effective in deactivating pathogens. Another aspect of cleaning, namely, purification of water contaminated with organic and inorganic pollutants, has also been discussed in detail. Strong oxidising agents produced within acoustic cavitation bubbles could be used to degrade organic pollutants and convert toxic inorganic pollutants to less harmful substances. The effect of ultrasonic frequency and surface activity of solutes on the sonochemical degradation efficiency has also been discussed in this overview.

6 July 2009 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBANDAR BABGI
BANDAR BABGI
Luca RigamontiLuca Rigamonti
Luca Rigamonti
MCMarie P. Cifuentes
Marie P. Cifuentes
TCT. Christopher Corkery
T. Christopher Corkery
MRMichael D. Randles
Michael D. Randles
MHMark G. Humphrey
Mark G. Humphrey

1 January 2019 in Polyhedron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKhlood H. Mashat
Khlood H. Mashat
BBBANDAR BABGI
BANDAR BABGI
Mostafa A. HussienMostafa A. Hussien
Mostafa A. Hussien
MAMuhammad Nadeem Arshad
Muhammad Nadeem Arshad
MAMagda Abdellattif
Magda Abdellattif

19 March 2009 in Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Luca RigamontiLuca Rigamonti
Luca Rigamonti
BBBANDAR BABGI
BANDAR BABGI
MCMarie P. Cifuentes
Marie P. Cifuentes
RRRachel L. Roberts
Rachel L. Roberts
SPSimon Petrie
Simon Petrie
MHMark G. Humphrey
Mark G. Humphrey

1 July 2018 in Journal of Molecular Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jamal LasriJamal Lasri
Jamal Lasri
MAMagda M. Aly
Magda M. Aly
NEnaser Eltaher Eltayeb
naser Eltaher Eltayeb
BBBANDAR BABGI
BANDAR BABGI

29 March 2021 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BBBANDAR BABGI
BANDAR BABGI
Jalal AlsayariJalal Alsayari
Jalal Alsayari
HAHana M. Alenezi
Hana M. Alenezi
MAMagda Abdellattif
Magda Abdellattif
NEnaser Eltaher Eltayeb
naser Eltaher Eltayeb
Mostafa A. HussienMostafa A. Hussien
Mostafa A. Hussien
A set of five gold complexes with the general formula Au(PR3)(C≡C-C6H4-4-R′) (R = PPh3, R′ = –CHO (1), R = PCy3, R′ = –CHO (2), R = PPh3, R′ = –N=CH-C6H4-2-OH (3), R = PPh3, R′ = –N=CH-C6H4-4-OH (4), R = PCy3, R′ = –N=CH-C6H4-2-OH (5)) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, 1H-NMR spectroscopy, 31P-NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. The structures of complexes 2 and 5 were determined by X-ray crystallography. The effects of the structural modifications on the protein binding affinities and anticancer activities of the five gold complexes were assessed. Fluorescence quenching experiments to assess binding to human serum albumin (HSA) revealed that the Schiff base complexes (3, 4, and 5) had binding constants that were superior to their parent aldehyde complexes and highlighted the position of the hydroxy group because complex 4 (4-hydroxy) had a binding constant 6400 times higher than complex 3 (2-hydroxy). The anticancer activities of the complexes against the OVCAR-3 (ovarian carcinoma) and HOP-62 (non-small-cell lung) cancer cell lines showed that the Schiff bases (3–5) were more cytotoxic than the aldehyde-containing complexes (1 and 2). Notably, compound 4 had cytotoxic activity comparable to that of cisplatin against OVCAR-3, demonstrating the significance of the para position for the hydroxy group. Molecular docking studies against the enzyme thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and human serum albumin were conducted, with docking scores in good agreement with the experimental data. The current study highlights how small structural modifications can alter physiochemical and anticancer properties. Moreover, this simple design strategy using the aldehyde group can generate extensive opportunities to explore new gold(I)-based anticancer drugs via condensation, cyclization, or nucleophilic addition reactions of the aldehyde.