We present a bilevel model for transmission expansion planning within a market environment, where producers and consumers trade freely electric energy through a pool. The target of the transmission planner, modeled through the upper-level problem, is to minimize network investment cost while facilitating energy trading. This upper-level problem is constrained by a collection of lower-level market clearing problems representing pool trading, and whose individual objective functions correspond to social welfare. Using the duality theory the proposed bilevel model is recast as a mixed-integer linear programming problem, which is solvable using branch-and-cut solvers. Detailed results from an illustrative example and a case study are presented and discussed. Finally, some relevant conclusions are drawn.

This paper addresses the optimal involvement in a futures electricity market of a power producer to hedge against the risk of pool price volatility. The considered trading horizon spans one whole year. Recognizing the highly uncertain nature of future pool prices, a stochastic programming framework with recourse is used to model this decision-making problem. The resulting problem is a large scale mixed-integer linear programming problem. Scenario reduction techniques are used to make this problem tractable. Risk is properly modeled using the CVaR methodology. Results from a realistic case study are provided and analyzed. Some conclusions are finally drawn.

This paper addresses generation maintenance scheduling in a competitive electric energy environment. In a centralized setting, the system operator derives a maintenance scheduling plan that attains the desired reliability while minimizing cost and imposes it to all producers. In a competitive environment, this is not possible because the operator is still in charge of maintaining an adequate level of reliability, but the target of each producer is to maximize its own profits, which conflicts in general with the reliability objective of the operator. This paper proposes a technically sound coordinating mechanism based on incentives/disincentives among producers and the operator, which allows producers to maximize their respective profits while the operator ensures an appropriate level of reliability.

This paper addresses the congestion management problem avoiding offline transmission capacity limits related to stability. These limits on line power flows are replaced by optimal power flow-related constraints that ensure an appropriate level of security, mainly targeting voltage instabilities, which are the most common source of stability problems. Results from an illustrative case study based on the IEEE 24-bus Reliability Test System are analyzed. Conclusions are duly drawn.

Recent breakthroughs in transmission network expansion planning (TNEP) have demonstrated that the use of robust optimization, as opposed to stochastic programming methods, renders the expansion planning problem considering uncertainties computationally tractable for real systems. However, there is still a yet unresolved and challenging problem as regards the resolution of the dynamic TNEP problem, which considers the year-by-year representation of uncertainties and investment decisions in an integrated way. This problem has been considered to be a highly complex and computationally intractable problem, and most research related to this topic focuses on very small case studies or used heuristic methods and has lead most studies about TNEP in the technical literature to take a wide spectrum of simplifying assumptions. In this paper, an adaptive robust TNEP formulation is proposed for keeping the full dynamic complexity of the problem. The method overcomes the problem size limitations and computational intractability associated with dynamic TNEP for realistic cases. Numerical results from an illustrative example and the IEEE 118-bus system are presented and discussed, demonstrating the benefits of this dynamic TNEP approach with respect to classical methods.