Cristina Alonso-Tristán

Dr. Cristina Alonso-Tristán

Research Group Solar and Wind Feasibility Technologies, Electromechanical Engineering Department, University of Burgos, 09006 Burgos, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2012 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDM. Díez-Mediavilla
M. Díez-Mediavilla
Cristina Alonso-TristánCristina Alonso-Tristán
Cristina Alonso-Tristán
MRM.C. Rodríguez-Amigo
M.C. Rodríguez-Amigo
TGT. García-Calderón
T. García-Calderón
MDM.I. Dieste-Velasco
M.I. Dieste-Velasco

25 February 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDavid Gonzaáez Peña
David Gonzaáez Peña
IAIván Alonso-deMiguel
Iván Alonso-deMiguel
MDMontserrat Díez-Mediavilla
Montserrat Díez-Mediavilla
Cristina Alonso-TristánCristina Alonso-Tristán
Cristina Alonso-Tristán
A new design for the use of photovoltaic and thermal (PV/T) technology with thermal storage is reported in this work. In the new design, a phase change material (PCM) tank is added to the backside of the photovoltaic panel. The advantages of this design are the storage of thermal energy and the efficiency improvement of the photovoltaic (PV) panel as a result of the temperature control of the PV cell during the phase change process. In addition, a perimeter with a black surface surrounds the PV panel to increase the absorption of thermal energy. The thermal energy is then transferred to the backside of the PCM tank by heat pipes. One prototype with lauric acid as PCM was tested under two different operating configurations and resulted in an overall daily efficiency of 50% coulding be improve by controlling the PCM temperature during the day.

1 October 2014 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDM. Díez-Mediavilla
M. Díez-Mediavilla
MDM.I. Dieste-Velasco
M.I. Dieste-Velasco
MRM.C. Rodríguez-Amigo
M.C. Rodríguez-Amigo
TGT. García-Calderón
T. García-Calderón
Cristina Alonso-TristánCristina Alonso-Tristán
Cristina Alonso-Tristán

1 January 2019 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDM. Díez-Mediavilla
M. Díez-Mediavilla
MRM.C. Rodríguez-Amigo
M.C. Rodríguez-Amigo
MDM.I. Dieste-Velasco
M.I. Dieste-Velasco
TGT. García-Calderón
T. García-Calderón
Cristina Alonso-TristánCristina Alonso-Tristán
Cristina Alonso-Tristán

1 August 2011 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Cristina Alonso-TristánCristina Alonso-Tristán
Cristina Alonso-Tristán
DPDavid Gonzaáez Peña
David Gonzaáez Peña
MDM. Díez-Mediavilla
M. Díez-Mediavilla
MRM. Rodríguez-Amigo
M. Rodríguez-Amigo
TGT. García-Calderón
T. García-Calderón

29 May 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDavid Gonzaáez Peña
David Gonzaáez Peña
Ignacio GarcíaIgnacio García
Ignacio García
MDMontserrat Díez-Mediavilla
Montserrat Díez-Mediavilla
MDM. I. Dieste-Velasco
M. I. Dieste-Velasco
Cristina Alonso-TristánCristina Alonso-Tristán
Cristina Alonso-Tristán
Prediction of energy production is crucial for the design and installation of PV plants. In this study, five free and commercial software tools to predict photovoltaic energy production are evaluated: RETScreen, Solar Advisor Model (SAM), PVGIS, PVSyst, and PV*SOL. The evaluation involves a comparison of monthly and annually predicted data on energy supplied to the national grid with real field data collected from three real PV plants. All the systems, located in Castile and Leon (Spain), have three different tilting systems: fixed mounting, horizontal-axis tracking, and dual-axis tracking. The last 12 years of operating data, from 2008 to 2020, are used in the evaluation. Although the commercial software tools were easier to use and their installations could be described in detail, their results were not appreciably superior. In annual global terms, the results hid poor estimations throughout the year, where overestimations were compensated by underestimated results. This fact was reflected in the monthly results: the software yielded overestimates during the colder months, while the models showed better estimates during the warmer months. In most studies, the deviation was below 10% when the annual results were analyzed. The accuracy of the software was also reduced when the complexity of the dual-axis solar tracking systems replaced the fixed installation.