Gang Tan

Dr. Gang Tan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GTGang Tan
Gang Tan
Publishers of Foundations and Trends, making research accessible

1 August 2021 in Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YFYongkai Fan
Yongkai Fan
JBJianrong Bai
Jianrong Bai
XLXia Lei
Xia Lei
WLWeiguo Lin
Weiguo Lin
QHQian Hu
Qian Hu
GTGang Tan
Gang Tan

7 September 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PMPaul Muntean
Paul Muntean
MFMatthias Fischer
Matthias Fischer
GTGang Tan
Gang Tan
ZLZhiqiang Lin
Zhiqiang Lin
JGJens Grossklags
Jens Grossklags
CEClaudia M. Eckert
Claudia M. Eckert

10 June 2019 in IEEE Security & Privacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZCZ. Berkay Celik
Z. Berkay Celik
PMPatrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel
GTGang Tan
Gang Tan
LBLeonardo Babun
Leonardo Babun
AUA. Selcuk Uluagac
A. Selcuk Uluagac

11 September 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
VDVishnu Asutosh Dasu
Vishnu Asutosh Dasu
AKAshish Kumar
Ashish Kumar
STSaeid Tizpaz-Niari
Saeid Tizpaz-Niari
GTGang Tan
Gang Tan
This paper investigates neuron dropout as a post-processing bias mitigation method for deep neural networks (DNNs). Neural-driven software solutions are increasingly applied in socially critical domains with significant fairness implications. While DNNs are exceptional at learning statistical patterns from data, they may encode and amplify historical biases. Existing bias mitigation algorithms often require modifying the input dataset or the learning algorithms. We posit that prevalent dropout methods may be an effective and less intrusive approach to improve fairness of pre-trained DNNs during inference. However, finding the ideal set of neurons to drop is a combinatorial problem. We propose NeuFair, a family of post-processing randomized algorithms that mitigate unfairness in pre-trained DNNs via dropouts during inference. Our randomized search is guided by an objective to minimize discrimination while maintaining the model’s utility. We show that NeuFair is efficient and effective in improving fairness (up to 69%) with minimal or no model performance degradation. We provide intuitive explanations of these phenomena and carefully examine the influence of various hyperparameters of NeuFair on the results. Finally, we empirically and conceptually compare NeuFair to different state-of-the-art bias mitigators.

19 July 2022 in ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MNMichael Norris
Michael Norris
ZCZ. Berkay Celik
Z. Berkay Celik
PVPrasanna Venkatesh
Prasanna Venkatesh
ZSZhao Shulin
Zhao Shulin
PMPatrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel
GTGang Tan
Gang Tan
IoT devices can be used to complete a wide array of physical tasks, but due to factors such as low computational resources and distributed physical deployment, they are susceptible to a wide array of faulty behaviors. Many devices deployed in homes, vehicles, industrial sites, and hospitals carry a great risk of damage to property, harm to a person, or breach of security if they behave faultily. We propose a general fault handling system named IoTRepair, which shows promising results for effectiveness with limited latency and power overhead in an IoT environment. IoTRepair dynamically organizes and customizes fault-handling techniques to address the unique problems associated with heterogeneous IoT deployments. We evaluate IoTRepair by creating a physical implementation mirroring a typical home environment to motivate the effectiveness of this system. Our evaluation showed that each of our fault-handling functions could be completed within 100 milliseconds after fault identification, which is a fraction of the time that state-of-the-art fault-identification methods take (measured in minutes). The power overhead is equally small, with the computation and device action consuming less than 30 milliwatts. This evaluation shows that IoTRepair not only can be deployed in a physical system, but offers significant benefits at a low overhead.