Lay summary: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the peritoneal membrane for dialysis. The peritoneal membrane is a thin layer of tissue that lines the abdomen. The lining is used as a filter to help remove extra fluid and poisonous waste from the blood. Everybody is unique. What is normal for one person’s membrane may be very different from another person’s. The kidney care team wants to provide each person with the best dialysis prescription for them and to do this they must evaluate the person’s peritoneal lining. Sometimes dialysis treatment itself can cause the membrane to change after some years. This means more assessments (evaluations) will be needed to determine whether the person’s peritoneal membrane has changed. Changes in the membrane may require changes to the dialysis prescription. This is needed to achieve the best dialysis outcomes. A key tool for these assessments is the peritoneal equilibration test (PET). It is a simple, standardized and reproducible tool. This tool is used to measure the peritoneal function soon after the start of dialysis. The goal is to understand how well the peritoneal membrane works at the start of dialysis. Later on in treatment, the PET helps to monitor changes in peritoneal function. If there are changes between assessments causing problems, the PET data may explain the cause of the dysfunction. This may be used to change the dialysis prescription to achieve the best outcomes. The most common problem with the peritoneal membrane occurs when fluid is not removed as well as it should be. This happens when toxins (poisons) in the blood cross the membrane more quickly than they should. This is referred to as a fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR). Since more efficient fluid removal is associated with better outcomes, developing a personal PD prescription based on the person’s PSTR is critically important. A less common problem happens when the membrane fails to work properly (also called membrane dysfunction) because the peritoneal membrane is less efficient, either at the start of treatment or developing after some years. If membrane dysfunction gets worse over time, then this is associated with progressive damage, scarring and thickening of the membrane. This problem can be identified through another change of the PET. It is called reduced ‘sodium dip’. Membrane dysfunction of this type is more difficult to treat and has many implications for the individual. If the damage is major, the person may need to stop PD. They would need to begin haemodialysis treatment (also spelled hemodialysis). This is a very important and emotional decision for individuals with kidney failure. Any decision that involves stopping PD therapy or transitioning to haemodialysis therapy should be made jointly between the clinical team, the person on dialysis and a caregiver, if requested. Although evidence is lacking about how often tests should be performed to determine peritoneal function, it seems reasonable to repeat them whenever there is difficulty in removing the amount of fluid necessary for maintaining the health and well-being of the individual. Whether routine evaluation of membrane function is associated with better outcomes has not been studied. Further research is needed to answer this important question as national policies in many parts of the world and the COVID-19 has placed a greater emphasis and new incentives encouraging the greater adoption of home dialysis therapies, especially PD. For Chinese and Spanish Translation of the Lay Summary, see Online Supplement Appendix 1. Key recommendations: Guideline 1: A pathophysiological taxonomy: A pathophysiological classification of membrane dysfunction, which provides mechanistic links to functional characteristics, should be used when prescribing individualized dialysis or when planning modality transfer (e.g. to automated peritoneal dialysis (PD) or haemodialysis) in the context of shared and informed decision-making with the person on PD, taking individual circumstances and treatment goals into account. ( practice point ) Guideline 2a: Identification of fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR): It is recommended that the PSTR is determined from a 4-h peritoneal equilibration test (PET), using either 2.5%/2.27% or 4.25%/3.86% dextrose/glucose concentration and creatinine as the index solute. ( practice point ) This should be done early in the course dialysis treatment (between 6 weeks and 12 weeks) ( GRADE 1A ) and subsequently when clinically indicated. ( practice point ) Guideline 2b: Clinical implications and mitigation of fast solute transfer: A faster PSTR is associated with lower survival on PD. ( GRADE 1A ) This risk is in part due to the lower ultrafiltration (UF) and increased net fluid reabsorption that occurs when the PSTR is above the average value. The resulting lower net UF can be avoided by shortening glucose-based exchanges, using a polyglucose solution (icodextrin), and/or prescribing higher glucose concentrations. ( GRADE 1A ) Compared to glucose, use of icodextrin can translate into improved fluid status and fewer episodes of fluid overload. ( GRADE 1A ) Use of automated PD and icodextrin may mitigate the mortality risk associated with fast PSTR. ( practice point ) Guideline 3: Recognizing low UF capacity: This is easy to measure and a valuable screening test. Insufficient UF should be suspected when either (a) the net UF from a 4-h PET is <400 ml (3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose) or <100 ml (2.27% glucose /2.5% dextrose), ( GRADE 1B ) and/or (b) the daily UF is insufficient to maintain adequate fluid status. ( practice point ) Besides membrane dysfunction, low UF capacity can also result from mechanical problems, leaks or increased fluid absorption across the peritoneal membrane not explained by fast PSTR. Guideline 4a: Diagnosing intrinsic membrane dysfunction (manifesting as low osmotic conductance to glucose) as a cause of UF insufficiency: When insufficient UF is suspected, the 4-h PET should be supplemented by measurement of the sodium dip at 1 h using a 3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose exchange for diagnostic purposes. A sodium dip ≤5 mmol/L and/or a sodium sieving ratio ≤0.03 at 1 h indicates UF insufficiency. ( GRADE 2B ) Guideline 4b: Clinical implications of intrinsic membrane dysfunction (de novo or acquired): in the absence of residual kidney function, this is likely to necessitate the use of hypertonic glucose exchanges and possible transfer to haemodialysis. Acquired membrane injury, especially in the context of prolonged time on treatment, should prompt discussions about the risk of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. ( practice point ) Guideline 5: Additional membrane function tests: measures of peritoneal protein loss, intraperitoneal pressure and more complex tests that estimate osmotic conductance and ‘lymphatic’ reabsorption are not recommended for routine clinical practice but remain valuable research methods. ( practice point ) Guideline 6: Socioeconomic considerations: When resource constraints prevent the use of routine tests, consideration of membrane function should still be part of the clinical management and may be inferred from the daily UF in response to the prescription. ( practice point )

The process of water reabsorption from the peritoneal cavity into the surrounding tissue substantially decreases the net ultrafiltration in patients on peritoneal dialysis. The goal of this study was to propose a mathematical model based on data from clinical studies and animal experiments to describe the changes in absorption rate, interstitial hydrostatic pressure, and tissue hydration caused by increased intraperitoneal pressure after the initiation of peritoneal dialysis. The model describes water transport through a deformable, porous tissue after infusion of isotonic solution into the peritoneal cavity. Blood capillary and lymphatic vessels are assumed to be uniformly distributed within the tissue. Starling's law is applied for a description of fluid transport through the capillary wall, and the transport within the interstitium is modeled by Darcy's law. Transport parameters such as interstitial fluid volume ratio, tissue hydraulic conductance, and lymphatic absorption in the tissue are dependent on local interstitial pressure. Numerical simulations show the strong dependence of fluid absorption and tissue hydration on the values of intraperitoneal pressure. Our results predict that in the steady state only ∼20–40% of the fluid that flows into the tissue from the peritoneal cavity is absorbed by the lymphatics situated in the tissue, whereas the larger (60–80%) part of the fluid is absorbed by the blood capillaries.

Removal of fluid excess from the plasma volume by ultrafiltration during hemodialysis (HD) is balanced by plasma refilling from the interstitium, driven mainly by the increase in plasma oncotic pressure. We calculated the plasma refilling coefficient (Kr, a parameter expressing the ratio of refilling rate to the increase in oncotic pressure) for nine patients, each undergoing two HD sessions differing by pretreatment fluid status and session time (shorter session, SH, 3.5 h, and longer session, LH, 4.5h). Relative blood volume change was measured online, and solute concentrations were measured regularly during the sessions. The volume of body compartments was measured by bioimpedance. The patients were more volume expanded before LH session (higher initial body mass and total body water). Oncotic pressure was similar for both sessions. The refilling rate, despite higher fluid overload in the LH sessions, was similar for both sessions. The final Kr values stabilized on similar levels (SH: 136.6 ± 55.6 ml/mm Hg/h and LH: 150.7 ± 73.6 ml/mm Hg/h) at similar times, notwithstanding the difference in initial fluid overload between the two groups, suggesting that Kr at dry weight is relatively insensitive to the initial fluid status of the patient.

The aim of this study was to simulate clinically observed intraperitoneal kinetics of dialysis fluid volume and solute concentrations during peritoneal dialysis. We were also interested in analyzing relationships between processes in the peritoneal cavity and processes occurring in the peritoneal tissue and microcirculation. A spatially distributed model was formulated for the combined description of volume and solute mass balances in the peritoneal cavity and flows across the interstitium and the capillary wall. Tissue local parameters were assumed dependent on the interstitial hydration and vasodilatation induced by glucose. The model was fitted to the average volume and solute concentration profiles from dwell studies in 40 clinically stable patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis using a 3.86% glucose dialysis solution. The model was able to describe the clinical data with high accuracy. An increase in the local interstitial pressure and tissue hydration within the distance of 2.5 mm from the peritoneal surface of the tissue was observed. The penetration of glucose into the tissue and removal of urea, creatinine, and sodium from the tissue were restricted to a layer located within 2 mm from the peritoneal surface. The initial decline of sodium concentration (sodium dip) was observed not only in intraperitoneal fluid but also in the tissue. The distributed model can provide a precise description of the relationship between changes in the peritoneal tissue and intraperitoneal dialysate volume and solute concentration kinetics. Computer simulations suggest that only a thin layer of the tissue within 2–3 mm from the peritoneal surface participates in the exchange of fluid and small solutes between the intraperitoneal dialysate and blood.

Background: Ultrafiltration failure (UFF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is due to altered peritoneal transport properties leading to reduced capacity to remove excess water. Here, with the aim to establish the role of local alterations of the two major transport barriers, peritoneal tissue and capillary wall, we investigate changes in overall peritoneal transport characteristics in UFF patients in relation to corresponding local alterations of peritoneal tissue and capillary wall transport properties.Methods: Six-hour dwell studies using 3.86% glucose solutions and radioisotopically labelled serum albumin added to dialysate as a volume marker were analysed in 31 continuous ambulatory PD patients, 20 with normal ultrafiltration (NUF) and 11 with UFF. For each patient, the physiologically based parameters were evaluated for both transport barriers using the spatially distributed approach based on the individual intraperitoneal profiles of volume and concentrations of glucose, sodium, urea and creatinine.Results: UFF patients as compared with NUF patients had increased solute diffusivity in both barriers, peritoneal tissue and capillary wall, decreased tissue hydraulic conductivity and increased local lymphatic absorption and functional decrease in the fraction of the ultra-small pores. This resulted in altered distribution of fluid and solutes in the peritoneal tissue, and decreased penetration depths of fluid and solutes into the tissue in UFF patients.Conclusions: Mathematical modelling using a spatially distributed approach for the description of clinical data suggests that alterations both in the capillary wall and in the tissue barrier contribute to UFF through their effect on transport and distribution of solutes and fluid within the tissue.

Based on a distributed model of peritoneal transport, in the present report, a mathematical theory is presented to explain how the osmotic agent in the peritoneal dialysis solution that penetrates tissue induces osmotically driven flux out of the tissue. The relationships between phenomenological transport parameters (hydraulic permeability and reflection coefficient) and the respective specific transport parameters for the tissue and the capillary wall are separately described. Closed formulas for steady-state flux across the peritoneal surface and for hydrostatic pressure at the opposite surface are obtained using an approximate description of the concentration profile of the osmotic agent within the tissue by exponential function. A case of experimental study with mannitol as the osmotic agent in the rat abdominal wall is shown to be well described by our theory and computer simulations and to validate the applied approximations. Furthermore, clinical dialysis with glucose as the osmotic agent is analyzed, and the effective transport rates and parameters are derived from the description of the tissue and capillary wall.