The textural characteristics of rocks influence their petrophysical and mechanical properties. Such parameters largely control rock mass stability. The ability to evaluate both immediate and long-term rock behaviors based on the interaction between various parameters of rock texture, petrophysical and mechanical properties is therefore crucial to many geoengineering facilities. However, due to the common lack of high-quality core samples for geomechanics and rock texture laboratory tests, single and multivariable regression analyses are conducted between mechanical properties and textural characteristics based on experimental test data. This study presents a review of how rock texture characteristics influence the geomechanical properties of a rock, and summarizes the regression equations between two aspects. More specifically, a review of the available literature on the effects of mineralogy, grain size, grain shape, packing density, foliation index, porosity, degree of weathering, and other rock physical characteristics on geomechanics is presented. Similarly, a review of the literature discussing the failure criteria of anisotropic rocks, both continuous and discontinuous, is also presented. These reviews are accompanied by a comparison of the fundamentals of these methods, describing their equations and discussing their advantages and disadvantages. This exercise has the objective of providing better guidelines on how to use these criteria, allowing for safer underground excavations via an improved understanding of how rock texture parameters affects the mechanical behavior of rocks.

The reliability of geomechanical models and engineering designs depend heavily on high-quality data. In geomechanical projects, collecting and analyzing laboratory data is crucial in characterizing the mechanical properties of soils and rocks. However, insufficient lab data or underestimating data treatment can lead to unreliable data being used in the design stage, causing safety hazards, delays, or failures. Hence, detecting outliers or extreme values is significant for ensuring accurate geomechanical analysis. This study reviews and categorizes applicable outlier detection methods for geomechanical data into fence labeling methods and statistical tests. Using real geomechanical data, the applicability of these methods was examined based on four elements: data distribution, sensitivity to extreme values, sample size, and data skewness. The results indicated that statistical tests were less effective than fence labeling methods in detecting outliers in geomechanical data due to limitations in handling skewed data and small sample sizes. Thus, the best outlier detection method should consider this matter. Fence labeling methods, specifically, the medcouple boxplot and semi-interquartile range rule, were identified as the most accurate outlier detection methods for geomechanical data but may necessitate more advanced statistical techniques. Moreover, Tukey’s boxplot was found unsuitable for geomechanical data due to negative confidence intervals that conflicted with geomechanical principles.