Catalin Copaescu

Prof. Catalin Copaescu

PONDERAS ACADEMIC HOSPITAL

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMuresan Ciobarca Daniela
Muresan Ciobarca Daniela
ACAdriana Florinela Cătoi
Adriana Florinela Cătoi
CCCatalin Copaescu
Catalin Copaescu
DMDoina Miere
Doina Miere
Crisan Gianina CristinaCrisan Gianina Cristina
Crisan Gianina Cristina
Obesity is associated with reduced gut microbial diversity and a high rate of micronutrient deficiency. Bariatric surgery, the therapy of choice for severe obesity, produces sustained weight loss and improvements in obesity-related comorbidities. Also, it significantly alters the gut microbiota (GM) composition and function, which might have an important impact on the micronutrient status as GM is able to synthesize certain vitamins, such as riboflavin, folate, B12, or vitamin K2. However, recent data have reported that GM is not fully restored after bariatric surgery; therefore, manipulation of GM through probiotics represents a promising therapeutic approach in bariatric patients. In this review, we discuss the latest evidence concerning the relationship between obesity, GM and micronutrients, the impact of bariatric surgery on GM in relation with micronutrients equilibrium, and the importance of the probiotics’ supplementation in obese patients submitted to surgical treatment.


1 January 2019 in Chirurgia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSimona Filip
Simona Filip
IHIonut Hutopila
Ionut Hutopila
CCCatalin Copaescu
Catalin Copaescu
Background: Laparoscopic gastric sleeve is a well-known bariatric procedure with good results on weight loss and remission of comorbidities. For patients with weight regain and a large sleeved stomach, the laparoscopic re-sleeve (re-LSG) can be considered a revisional option. The objective of this study is to evaluate the results of laparoscopic re-sleeve as revisional procedure in patients with weight regain after gastric sleeve, in a Center of Excellence in Bariatric Surgery (BS-CoE). A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively maintained database identified 27 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric re-sleeve after gastric sleeve from January 2013 - December 2016 in our BS-CoE. Patients were monitored in conformity with our standard bariatric program and the efficiency of re-sleeve in terms of weight loss and comorbidities outcome was evaluated at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years postoperative. Results: Re-sleeve gastrectomy was performed by laparoscopic approach in all cases and 24 (89%) patients had concurrent surgical procedures, all of them hiatal hernia repair. No intra or postoperative complications were found except one case of gastric tube stenosis. Mean BMI before resleeve was 35.69 kg/m2 (range 28,58-52) and follow-up results at 6 months after re-sleeve revealed mean BMI was 28.39 +- 5.32 kg/m2 with EWL 83.88%, at 1 year mean BMI 27.23 +- 5.23 kg/m2 with EWL 94.45% and at 3 years BMI 27.65 +- 5.13 kg/m2 with EWL 85.41%. There are statistically significant differences (p 0.01), between BMI before re-sleeve and BMI for all other moments of measurement 6 months, 1 year and 3 years after re-sleeve. All the 6 patients (22%) with comorbidities before re-sleeve had remission of their diseases at ne year postoperative, but 1 patient had recurrence of hypertension at 3 years postoperative. Laparoscopic redo sleeve is an efficient revisional surgery option for weight regain after primary gastric sleeve with effective weight loss and improvement of comorbidities in a medium term follow-up.

28 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maurizio De LucaMaurizio De Luca
Maurizio De Luca
Amanda BelluzziAmanda Belluzzi
Amanda Belluzzi
PSPaulina Salminen
Paulina Salminen
MBMarco Bueter
Marco Bueter
JPJuan Pujol-Rafols
Juan Pujol-Rafols
MMMatteo Monami
Matteo Monami
Background: The prevalence of obesity is already a worldwide health concern. The development of straightforward guidelines regarding the whole available armamentarium (i.e., medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions in conjunction with a guidance program) is paramount to offering the best multimodal approach to patients with obesity. Methods: The International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders-European Chapter (IFSO-EC) identified a panel of experts to develop the present guidelines. The panel formulated a series of clinical questions (based on the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome conceptual framework), which have been voted on and approved. A GRADE methodology will be applied to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations employed to minimize selection and information biases. This approach aims to enhance the reliability and validity of recommendations, promoting greater adherence to the best available evidence. Results: These guidelines are intended for adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who are candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). The expert panel responsible for developing these guidelines comprised 25 panelists (92% were bariatric surgeons) and 3 evidence reviewers, with an average age of 50.1 ± 10.2 years. The panel focused on 3 key questions regarding the combined use of structured lifestyle interventions, approved obesity management medications, and endoscopic weight loss procedures with MBS. Conclusions: The complexity of obesity as a chronic disease requires a comprehensive knowledge of all the available and feasible therapeutic options. The IFSO-EC society felt the urgent need to develop methodologically valid guidelines to give a full picture and awareness of the possible surgical and non-surgical therapeutic strategies employed with a multimodal approach.

1 January 2019 in Chirurgia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IHIonut Hutopila
Ionut Hutopila
CCCatalin Copaescu
Catalin Copaescu
Background: obesity is a risk factor for gastro-esophageal disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH) occurrence. A substantial number of obese patients have HH. Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) and Barium X-ray oral study are used for preoperative gastrointestinal evaluation. Not all HH can be diagnosed before surgery, some are discovered during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). to assess the possible correlations between intraoperative presence of hiatal hernia (known or new discovered) and preoperative clinical, radiological and endoscopic data specific for GERD and HH. single institution Ponderas Academic Hospital, Center of Excellence in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Material and Methods: The prospectively maintained database of the institution was retrospectively quired to identify all the patients who underwent primary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) without/with concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair between January 2015 to May 2016. Patient characteristics, co-morbidities, GERD symptoms, radiologic oral contrast study, endoscopy and operative details were analyzed. Results: six hundred ninety-five patients (260 male and 435 female) were identified meeting inclusion criteria (LSG +- HH repair). Mean age of patients was 41 +- 11.71years and average body mass index (BMI) was 41.96 +- 7.28 kg/m2. Preoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast series and endoscopy were performed for entire group study and demonstrated a hiatal hernia in 339 patients (48.78%). In all these cases, HH was repaired concomitantly with LSG. One hundred ninety-two patients (56.63%) were diagnosed with HH before operation and confirmed intraoperatively (Group A). The diagnosis of hiatal hernia was established intraoperatively for 147 patients (43.37%) - group B, using the surgical protocol for active identification of preoperative undiagnosed hiatal hernia - SPAIH. preoperative investigations such as EGD and barium X-ray oral study are suboptimal in diagnosing HH, therefore, in a significant number of patients, the presence of HH has been established using our surgical protocol - SPAIH. Crura approximation (HHR) concomitantly with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is reproducible, may prevent the HH progression and possible GERD complications in the postoperative period of time.

1 January 2019 in Chirurgia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELElena Lechea
Elena Lechea
Mihaela PopescuMihaela Popescu
Mihaela Popescu
DDDoina Dimulescu
Doina Dimulescu
DGDaniela Godoroja
Daniela Godoroja
CCCatalin Copaescu
Catalin Copaescu
Introduction: Nowadays, obesity is a major worldwide health problem due to its serious consequences and toits increasing prevalence. Bariatric surgery has demonstrated a sustained weight loss and an efficient long-term control of the co-morbidities associated with obesity. The objective of our study was to compare cardiovascular risk factors before and after bariatric surgery. Material and Method: We have retrospectively studied 59 consecutive patients scheduled for bariatric surgery (gastric sleeve) in Ponderas Academic Hospital between January and March 2016, excluding the ones that didn't commit to respect the follow-up terms. The preoperative, 6 and 12 postoperative months blood tests and anthropometric measurements were comparatively analyzed. Results: BMI, waist circumference and total body weight decreased by 38%, 31%, and 41%; Glycemia, triglycerides and LDL cholesterol decreased by 16%, 37% and 9% respectively; HDL cholesterol increased by 18%. The decline was statistically significant for all variables (P 0.001) except for LDL cholesterol. The need for antihypertensive treatment was reduced by 60% and for lipid lowering treatment diminished by 21%. In diabetic patients glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased by 28% and the necessity for antidiabetic medical treatment dropped by 69%. Conclusions: Weight loss obtained by bariatric surgery in this study, improved the metabolic syndrome in all its components, obesity, hyperglycemia/type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, thus reducing the cardiovascular risk.