Linda Schenk

Dr. Linda Schenk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2021 in Risk Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLinda Schenk
Linda Schenk
KHKarim Hamza
Karim Hamza
LALeena Arvanitis
Leena Arvanitis
ILIann Lundegård
Iann Lundegård
AWAndrzej Wojcik
Andrzej Wojcik
KHKarin Haglund
Karin Haglund
Socioscientific issues (SSI) concern social issues, often lacking simple solutions, that relate to science and often also risk controversies. SSIs have become an established part of science education, aiming to teach students not only about content knowledge but also about the nature of science and to offer them practice in argumentation and decision making. We performed a scoping review of the literature on SSI in science education research, in order to investigate if the topics covered would lean themselves to education about risk, and if risk is raised in these works. Using Web of Science we identified 296 empirical publications and 91 theoretical or review publications about SSI teaching in science education. The empirical publications covered studies performed in primary to tertiary school, most commonly upper secondary school (32%). The most frequently taught SSI themes were nature conservation, biotechnology, and climate change. Despite that these, as most of the other identified themes, clearly are connected to risk analysis and risk management, few publications raised the concept of risk and the methods of risk analysis. In fact, almost half (empirical: 48%, theoretical: 49%) did not mention risk at all. We argue that SSIs present an opportunity for risk researchers to engage with educators to incorporate risk in school science education and to contribute in developing teaching materials suitable toward that aim.

1 March 2008 in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLinda Schenk
Linda Schenk
SHSven Ove Hansson
Sven Ove Hansson
CRChristina Rudén
Christina Rudén
MGMichael Gilek
Michael Gilek

1 November 2020 in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNancy B. Hopf
Nancy B. Hopf
CCC. Champmartin
C. Champmartin
LSLinda Schenk
Linda Schenk
ABAurelie Berthet
Aurelie Berthet
LCL. Chedik
L. Chedik
ABA.L. Bunge
A.L. Bunge

23 April 2019 in International Journal of Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLinda Schenk
Linda Schenk
KHKarim M. Hamza
Karim M. Hamza
MEMargareta Enghag
Margareta Enghag
ILIann Lundegård
Iann Lundegård
LALeena Arvanitis
Leena Arvanitis
AWAndrzej Wojcik
Andrzej Wojcik
The present paper takes its point of departure in risk being a relevant content for science education, and that there are many different approaches to how to incorporate it. By reviewing the academic literature on the use and definitions of risk from fields such as engineering, linguistics and philosophy, we identified key elements of the risk concept relevant for science education. Risk is a phenomenon of the future that may be conveyed by our activity, it is something that may or may not take place. Hence, at the core of risk we find uncertainty and consequence. Furthermore, the elements of probability and severity are relevant modifiers of the consequence, as well as both subject to uncertainty. Additionally, in framing, understanding and decision-making on risk, as individuals or society, we need to acknowledge that risk has both objective and subjective components, lying in the interface between knowledge and values. In this paper, we describe how these key elements were derived from the literature and derive a schematic model of the risk concept for the purpose of science education. We further discuss how this model may assist in planning, execution and evaluation of teaching activities explicitly or implicitly involving risk issues.

31 October 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLinda Schenk
Linda Schenk
MRMatias Rauma
Matias Rauma
MFMartin N Fransson
Martin N Fransson
GJGunnar Johanson
Gunnar Johanson
Percutaneous absorption is highly variable between chemicals but also within chemicals depending on exposure conditions and experimental set up. We tested a larger number of organic solvents with the same experimental set up, using skin from new-born piglets and static diffusion cells. Thirty-six common organic solvents were studied neat (and 31 of them also in water dilution): acetone, acetonitrile, n-butanol 2-butanone 2-butoxyethanol, 1-butoxy-2-propanol, n-butyl acetate, butyl acrylate, cyclohexane, cyclohexanone, 1,2-dichloroethane, dichloromethane, ethanol, 2-ethoxyethanol, ethyl acetate, ethyl acrylate, ethylbenzene, furfuryl alcohol, n-hexane, 2-hexanone, 2-isopropoxyethanol, methanol, 1-methoxy-2-propanol, methyl acrylate, 3-methyl-1-butanol, methyl tertiary butyl ether, 4-metyl-2-pentanol, methyl methacrylate, 2-propanol, 2-propen-1-ol, 2-propoxyethanol, 1-propoxy-2-propanol, styrene, trichloromethane, toluene and m-xylene. In addition, a mixture of 2-methylbutyl acetate and n-pentyl acetate was tested. For most of the solvents, little or no percutaneous absorption data have been published. Lag times, steady-state fluxes and apparent permeability coefficients were obtained from the time courses of solvent appearance in the receptor medium, as measured by gas chromatography. The use of the same methodology and kind of skin resulted in small variability within experiments, underlining the need for consistent methodology for useful results for developing predictive models. Furthermore, a comparison of the neat and diluted data shows that water dilution affects all these variables and that the direction and magnitude of the effects vary between chemicals. This comparison strongly supports that prediction of percutaneous absorption of neat and water diluted chemicals requires different models.

23 August 2013 in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QDQian Ding
Qian Ding
LSLinda Schenk
Linda Schenk
SHSven Ove Hansson
Sven Ove Hansson