Author Summary: Background.: Disulfiram, an alcohol aversion agent, has been in use for >50 years. Numerous authors have reported an anticancer effect of this drug in vitro and in mouse models. More recently, several reports have claimed that disulfiram also possesses anti-stem cell activity. We set out to obtain initial data regarding the safety of combining this drug with chemotherapy and the possible effectiveness of disulfiram in a combination regimen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods.: This phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study assessed the safety and efficacy of adding of disulfiram to cisplatin and vinorelbine for six cycles. Newly diagnosed NSCLC patients were recruited. Patients with either stage IV or what was considered at the time “wet IIIb” (since 2009, these patients have been considered stage IV) were recruited. The patients were treated with only chemotherapy, and none were treated with either surgery or chemoradiation. Disulfiram was administered at a dose of 40 mg three times daily. Results.: Forty patients were treated for more than two cycles, half with and half without disulfiram, which was well tolerated. An increase in survival was noted for the experimental group (10 vs. 7.1 months). Interestingly, there were only two long-term survivors, both in the disulfiram group. Conclusion.: The addition of disulfiram to a combination regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine was well tolerated and appeared to prolong survival in patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. The results from this small study seem encouraging enough for assessment in larger trials. Disulfiram is an inexpensive and safe drug; if its addition to chemotherapy could be shown to prolong survival, an effective regimen could be established and used widely, even in resource-poor countries.

Purpose: Acquired RET fusions have been reported at resistance to treatment with EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, a multicenter cohort of patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with osimertinib and selpercatinib for RET fusion–mediated osimertinib resistance has not previously been published. Patients and Methods: Patients who received selpercatinib in combination with osimertinib on a prospective expanded access clinical trial (NCT03906331) and single-patient compassionate use programs across five countries were centrally analyzed. All patients had advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with a RET fusion detected from tissue or plasma following osimertinib therapy. Clinicopathologic and outcomes data were collected. Results: Fourteen patients with EGFR-mutant and RET fusion–positive lung cancers who experienced prior progression on osimertinib received osimertinib and selpercatinib. EGFR exon 19 deletions (±T790M, 86%) and non-KIF5B fusions (CCDC6-RET 50%, NCOA4-RET 36%) predominated. Osimertinib 80 mg daily and selpercatinib 80 mg twice daily were the most commonly administered dosages. The response rate, disease control rate, and median treatment duration were 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 25%–75%, n = 12], 83% (95% CI, 55%–95%), and 7.9 months (range, 0.8–25+), respectively. Resistance was complex, involving EGFR on-target (EGFR C797S), RET on-target (RET G810S), and off-target (EML4–ALK/STRN–ALK, KRAS G12S, BRAF V600E) mechanisms; RET fusion loss; or polyclonal mechanisms. Conclusions: For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with an acquired RET fusion as a mechanism of EGFR inhibitor resistance, the addition of selpercatinib to osimertinib was feasible and safe and offered clinical benefit, supporting the prospective evaluation of this combination. See related commentary by Krebs and Popat, p. 2951

50-70% of tumors of the so called "triple negative" subtype of breast cancer express EGFR. We hypothesized that addition of anti EGFR to Taxanes will result in increased effectiveness in EGFR expressing tumors. Here we set out to obtain data regarding the safety, tolerability and also the effectivity of the combination of weekly Taxane treatments with Cetuximab -an anti EGFR antibody in this subgroup of breast cancer. 18 triple negative breast cancer patients were treated with weekly Cetuximab and Taxane therapy. Addition of Cetuximab resulted in controllable Dermatologic toxicity in most patients -with grade 3 in two patients. Some impressive results were noted including one CR, one near CR and regression of chemotherapy and radiation resistance skin metastasis. Median TTF -and overall survival -6 and 12 months. Administration of Taxane Cetuximab weekly therapy for triple negative breast cancer patients is feasible. Use of anti EGFR-Taxane combinations should be assessed in larger clinical trials in this patient population perhaps in a similar manner to the lung cancer patients only in those with strong EGFR expression.

Background. FGFR1/2/3 fusions have been reported infrequently in aNSCLC, including as a rare, acquired resistance mechanism following treatment with EGFR TKIs. Data regarding their prevalence and therapeutic implications are limited. Methods. The Guardant Health (GH) electronic database (ED) was evaluated for cases of aNSCLC and FGFR2/3 fusions; FGFR2/3 fusion prevalence with and without a co-existing EGFR mutation was assessed. The ED of Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (TASMC, June 2020–June 2021) was evaluated for cases of aNSCLC and de novo FGFR1/2/3 fusions. Patients with EGFR mutant aNSCLC progressing on EGFR TKIs and developing an FGFR1/2/3 fusion were selected from the ED of Davidoff Cancer Center (DCC) and Oncology Department, Bnei-Zion hospital (BZ) (April 2014–April 2021). Clinicopathological characteristics, systemic therapies, and outcomes were assessed. Results. In the GH ED (n = 57,445), the prevalence of FGFR2 and FGFR3 fusions were 0.02% and 0.26%, respectively. FGFR3-TACC3 fusion predominated (91.5%). In 23.8% of cases, FGFR2/3 fusions co-existed with EGFR sensitizing mutations (exon 19 del, 64.1%; L858R, 33.3%, L861Q, 2.6%). Among samples with concurrent FGFR fusions and EGFR sensitizing mutations, 41.0% also included EGFR resistant mutations. In TASMC (n = 161), 1 case of de novo FGFR3-TACC3 fusion was detected (prevalence, 0.62%). Of three patients from DCC and BZ with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions following progression on EGFR TKIs, two received EGFR TKI plus erdafitinib, an FGFR TKI, with clinical benefit duration of 13.0 and 6.0 months, respectively. Conclusions. Over 23% of FGFR2/3 fusions in aNSCLC may be associated with acquired resistance following treatment with EGFR TKIs. In this clinical scenario, a combination of EGFR TKIs and FGFR TKIs represents a promising treatment strategy.