Kari Nielsen

Dr. Kari Nielsen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 March 2015 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHelena Cirenajwis
Helena Cirenajwis
HEHenrik Ekedahl
Henrik Ekedahl
MLMartin Lauss
Martin Lauss
KHKatja Harbst
Katja Harbst
ACAna Carneiro
Ana Carneiro
Göran JönssonGöran Jönsson
Göran Jönsson
Molecular stratification of metastatic melanoma using gene expression profiling : Prediction of survival outcome and benefit from molecular targeted therapy

16 March 2016 in Journal of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPelle G. Lindqvist
Pelle G. Lindqvist
EEE. Epstein
E. Epstein
KNKari Nielsen
Kari Nielsen
MLM. Landin‐Olsson
M. Landin‐Olsson
CIC. Ingvar
C. Ingvar
HOH. Olsson
H. Olsson

4 April 2014 in Journal of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPelle G. Lindqvist
Pelle G. Lindqvist
EEElisabeth Epstein
Elisabeth Epstein
MLMona Landin-Olsson
Mona Landin-Olsson
CIC. Ingvar
C. Ingvar
KNKari Nielsen
Kari Nielsen
HOH. Olsson
H. Olsson
Background: Sunlight exposure and fair skin are major determinants of human vitamin D production, but they are also risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM). There is epidemiological evidence that all‐cause mortality is related to low vitamin D levels.Methods: We assessed the avoidance of sun exposure as a risk factor for all‐cause mortality for 29 518 Swedish women in a prospective 20‐year follow‐up of the Melanoma in Southern Sweden (MISS) cohort. Women were recruited from 1990 to 1992 and were aged 25 to 64 years at the start of the study. We obtained detailed information at baseline on their sun exposure habits and potential confounders. Multivariable flexible parametric survival analysis was applied to the data.Results: There were 2545 deaths amongst the 29 518 women who responded to the initial questionnaire. We found that all‐cause mortality was inversely related to sun exposure habits. The mortality rate amongst avoiders of sun exposure was approximately twofold higher compared with the highest sun exposure group, resulting in excess mortality with a population attributable risk of 3%.Conclusion: The results of this study provide observational evidence that avoiding sun exposure is a risk factor for all‐cause mortality. Following sun exposure advice that is very restrictive in countries with low solar intensity might in fact be harmful to women's health.

16 July 2013 in British Journal of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HEHenrik Ekedahl
Henrik Ekedahl
HCH. Cirenajwis
H. Cirenajwis
KHK. Harbst
K. Harbst
ACAna Carneiro
Ana Carneiro
KNKari Nielsen
Kari Nielsen
Göran JönssonGöran Jönsson
Göran Jönsson
Background BRAF and NRAS mutations are frequently found in melanoma tumours, and recently developed BRAF‐targeted therapies demonstrate significant clinical benefit. Objectives We sought to investigate the clinical significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in a clinic‐based metastatic melanoma cohort. Methods In total, 237 tumours, mostly metastatic lesions, from 203 patients were screened for mutations in exon 15 of BRAF and exon 2 of NRAS using Sanger sequencing. BRAF and NRAS mutation status was analysed in relation to clinical and histopathological characteristics, and outcome. Results Mutation in BRAF and NRAS was present in 43% (88% V600E, 10% V600K) and 30% (48% Q61K, 40% Q61R) of metastatic melanomas, respectively. We found consistent BRAF and NRAS mutation status in all but one of 27 patients with multiple metastases. BRAF mutation was associated with younger age at primary diagnosis (P = 0·02). Among patients with distant metastatic melanoma, patients with BRAF‐mutant tumours without BRAF inhibitor treatment had inferior survival compared with patients with BRAF inhibitor treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 2·35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·10–5·01, P = 0·03]. We also observed a trend towards better prognosis for patients with wild‐type and NRAS‐mutant tumours compared with BRAF V600E‐mutant tumours (HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·39–1·04, P = 0·07; and HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·48–1·21, P = 0·25, respectively). Conclusions We were able to confirm the effect of BRAF inhibitor treatment in a single clinical institution. The results suggest further that BRAF mutation is a weak prognostic factor but a strong predictive factor and that BRAF‐mutant melanoma might constitute one or more distinct subtypes of the disease with certain aetiology and clinical outcome.

9 April 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMartin Lauss
Martin Lauss
BPBengt Phung
Bengt Phung
TBTroels Holz Borch
Troels Holz Borch
KHKatja Harbst
Katja Harbst
KKKamila Kaminska
Kamila Kaminska
Göran JönssonGöran Jönsson
Göran Jönsson
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcome for patients with metastatic melanoma but not all benefit from treatment. Several immune- and tumor intrinsic features are associated with clinical response at baseline. However, we need to further understand the molecular changes occurring during development of ICB resistance. Here, we collect biopsies from a cohort of 44 patients with melanoma after progression on anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 monotherapy. Genetic alterations of antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways are observed in approximately 25% of ICB resistant cases. Anti-CTLA4 resistant lesions have a sustained immune response, including immune-regulatory features, as suggested by multiplex spatial and T cell receptor (TCR) clonality analyses. One anti-PD1 resistant lesion harbors a distinct immune cell niche, however, anti-PD1 resistant tumors are generally immune poor with non-expanded TCR clones. Such immune poor microenvironments are associated with melanoma cells having a de-differentiated phenotype lacking expression of MHC-I molecules. In addition, anti-PD1 resistant tumors have reduced fractions of PD1+ CD8+ T cells as compared to ICB naïve metastases. Collectively, these data show the complexity of ICB resistance and highlight differences between anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 resistance that may underlie differential clinical outcomes of therapy sequence and combination.

10 June 2016 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHildur Helgadottir
Hildur Helgadottir
VHVeronica Höiom
Veronica Höiom
RTRainer Tuominen
Rainer Tuominen
KNKari Nielsen
Kari Nielsen
GJGöran Jönsson
Göran Jönsson
JHJohan Hansson
Johan Hansson
Background: Germline mutations in CDKN2A have been associated with increased risk of melanoma and tobacco-related cancers in respiratory and upper digestive tissues. In CDKN2A wild-type (wt) melanoma families, other known high-risk, melanoma-predisposing mutations are rare, and no increased risk has been observed for nonskin cancers in this group. This study is the first to compare survival in germline CDKN2A mutated (mut) and nonmutated melanoma cases.